Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion.

Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion.

+8
Joanimaroni
Sal
boards of FL
Floridatexan
Vikingwoman
KarlRove
Wordslinger
Markle
12 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Go down  Message [Page 3 of 10]

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:bs... that's just your opinion and bias masquerading as fact and your alternative reality.

Indoctrination is fun boys and girls... because without it you would have to acknowledge that dems were the racists.

That's utter bullshit Pkrbum. The courts rejecting the ID restrictions in a number of states isn't fantasy. Stick your indoctrination crapola where the sun don't shine.

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:bs... that's just your opinion and bias masquerading as fact and your alternative reality.

Indoctrination is fun boys and girls... because without it you would have to acknowledge that dems were the racists.

That's utter bullshit Pkrbum. The courts rejecting the ID restrictions in a number of states isn't fantasy. Stick your indoctrination crapola where the sun don't shine.

Whelp... which party has the storied history of racism? Including the filibuster of the civil rights act and kkk members?

The most you can assign to the republicans is innuendo and talkingpoint propaganda. Nice strategy comrade.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


You are lying through your teeth...or possibly you can't see the truth because of the blinders you wear 24/7/365.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

[quote="PkrBum"]
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:bs... that's just your opinion and bias masquerading as fact and your alternative reality.

Indoctrination is fun boys and girls... because without it you would have to acknowledge that dems were the racists.

That's utter bullshit Pkrbum.  The courts rejecting the ID restrictions in a number of states isn't fantasy.  Stick your indoctrination crapola where the sun don't shine.

Whelp... which party has the storied history of racism? Including the filibuster of the civil rights act and kkk members?
The most you can assign to the republicans is innuendo and talkingpoint propaganda. Nice strategy comrade.


Now you're beginning to look like a fool.
Here's a big secret Pkrbum:  It's 2015 not 1965.

Squirm all you want, weasel word your best.  Just like your good buddy Scalise, It's all you can do when confronted with truth.

Guest


Guest

Racism is just another demagogue thrown against the wall for propaganda purposes... along with women hating, homophobia, poor hating, corporate loving, greedy, anti-science, gun fanatic, bible thumping, war mongers, neanderthals... etc.

Thanks for playing comrade... you are very useful.

boards of FL

boards of FL

PkrBum wrote:Racism is just another demagogue thrown against the wall for propaganda purposes... along with women hating, homophobia, poor hating, corporate loving, greedy, anti-science, gun fanatic, bible thumping, war mongers, neanderthals... etc.

Thanks for playing comrade... you are very useful.


Holy shit you're an idiot.


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Racism is just another demagogue thrown against the wall for propaganda purposes... along with women hating, homophobia, poor hating, corporate loving, greedy, anti-science, gun fanatic, bible thumping, war mongers, neanderthals... etc.

Thanks for playing comrade... you are very useful.


Holy shit you're an idiot.

That falls under neanderthal. Keep up the good work comrade.

GOEBBELS' PRINCIPLES OF PROPAGANDA

Based upon Goebbels' Principles of Propaganda by Leonard W. Doob, published in Public Opinion and Propaganda; A Book of Readings edited for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.

1. Propagandist must have access to intelligence concerning events and public opinion. 2. Propaganda must be planned and executed by only one authority.

a. It must issue all the propaganda directives.

b. It must explain propaganda directives to important officials and maintain their morale.

c. It must oversee other agencies' activities which have propaganda consequences

3. The propaganda consequences of an action must be considered in planning that action.
4. Propaganda must affect the enemy's policy and action.

a. By suppressing propagandistically desirable material which can provide the enemy with useful intelligence

b. By openly disseminating propaganda whose content or tone causes the enemy to draw the desired conclusions

c. By goading the enemy into revealing vital information about himself

d. By making no reference to a desired enemy activity when any reference would discredit that activity

5. Declassified,operational information must be available to implement a propaganda campaign
6. To be perceived,propaganda must evoke the interest of an audience and must be transmitted through an attention-getting communications medium.
7. Credibility alone must determine whether propaganda output should be true or false. 8. The purpose,content and effectiveness of enemy propaganda; the strength and effects of an expose; and the nature of current propaganda campaigns determine whether enemy propaganda should be ignored or refuted.
9. Credibility,intelligence,and the possible effects of communicating determine whether propaganda materials should be censored.
10. Material from enemy propaganda may be utilized in operations when it helps diminish that enemy's prestige or lends support to the propagandist's own objective. 11. Black rather than white propaganda may be employed when the latter is less credible or produces undesirable effects.
12. Propaganda may be facilitated by leaders with prestige.
13. Propaganda must be carefully timed.

a. The communication must reach the audience ahead of competing propaganda.

b. A propaganda campaign must begin at the optimum moment

c. A propaganda theme must be repeated,but not beyond some point of diminishing effectiveness

14. Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.

a. They must evoke desired responses which the audience previously possesses

b. They must be capable of being easily learned

c. They must be utilized again and again,but only in appropriate situations

d. They must be boomerang-proof

15. Propaganda to the home front must prevent the raising of false hopes which can be blasted by future events.
16. Propaganda to the home front must create an optimum anxiety level.

a. Propaganda must reinforce anxiety concerning the consequences of defeat

b. Propaganda must diminish anxiety (other than concerning the consequences of defeat) which is too high and which cannot be reduced by people themselves

17. Propaganda to the home front must diminish the impact of frustration.

a. Inevitable frustrations must be anticipated

b. Inevitable frustrations must be placed in perspective

18. Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred. 19. Propaganda cannot immediately affect strong counter-tendencies; instead it must offer some form of action or diversion,or both.

Markle

Markle

My Socialist/Communist good friend Wordslinger strikes again.

Vikingwoman



Why is Pkr.posting under Guest? Has he been banned?

Sal

Sal

Vikingwoman wrote:Why is Pkr.posting under Guest?

Bad ideas fail.

Markle

Markle

Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion. - Page 3 Atheism_zpsjbxqltlz

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion. - Page 3 Atheism_zpsjbxqltlz

Why of course. The absence of something proves it exists .... LOL

Markle

Markle

If there is no God, why do you have to practice the religion of Heathenism?

Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion. - Page 3 Bump

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:If there is no God, why do you have to practice the religion of Heathenism?

Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion. - Page 3 Bump
Atheism is the absence of belief in a God figure.  It is the absence of religion or faith.  Perhaps too complex for Semi-Sane "I KNOW NOSSING!" Markle.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:If there is no God, why do you have to practice the religion of Heathenism?

Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion. - Page 3 Bump
Atheism is the absence of belief in a God figure.  It is the absence of religion or faith.  Perhaps too complex for Semi-Sane "I KNOW NOSSING!" Markle.

Once again you are wrong, but, again, not surprising. After all you're still figuring out the boiling point of water.

I would believe, that someone of your stature, so proud of the depth and breadth of your knowledge about faith and God would know that Atheism is a religion. You know, just like Episcopalian, Mormon, Baptist, Catholic or perhaps you're more aligned with Muslims?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Semi-sane, "I KNOW NOSSING" Markle, our resident racist, wrote:


"I would believe, that someone of your stature, so proud of the depth and breadth of your knowledge about faith and God would know that Atheism is a religion. You know, just like Episcopalian, Mormon, Baptist, Catholic or perhaps you're more aligned with Muslims?"


Webster's Dictionary definition:

atheist

noun athe·ist \ˈā-thē-ist\


: a person who believes that God does not exist


religion

noun re·li·gion \ri-ˈli-jən\

: the belief in a god or in a group of gods


Clearly, if we use the English language as a medium, I understand the difference between atheism and religion, and you do not. 

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

I forgot to comment about that part of  Semi-sane's reference that again shows his prejudice:


"I would believe, that someone of your stature, so proud of the depth and breadth of your knowledge about faith and God would know that Atheism is a religion. You know, just like Episcopalian, Mormon, Baptist, Catholic or perhaps you're more aligned with Muslims?"


Obviously, in Markle's jaundiced eyes, Muslims are not as much a religion as the Christian sects he mentioned.  At least as a atheist I equally accuse all religions as being utter bullshit. 



If you're keeping score, you can add Muslims to the categories of humans Semi-sane Markle hates.


Reality.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:Semi-sane, "I KNOW NOSSING" Markle, our resident racist, wrote:


"I would believe, that someone of your stature, so proud of the depth and breadth of your knowledge about faith and God would know that Atheism is a religion. You know, just like Episcopalian, Mormon, Baptist, Catholic or perhaps you're more aligned with Muslims?"


Webster's Dictionary definition:

atheist


noun athe·ist \ˈā-thē-ist\


: a person who believes that God does not exist


religion


noun re·li·gion \ri-ˈli-jən\

: the belief in a god or in a group of gods


Clearly, if we use the English language as a medium, I understand the difference between atheism and religion, and you do not.

Like I said, I'm surprised you don't keep up with events effecting your religion. I'm NOT surprised that I know more about your religion than you.

From the US Supreme Court:
"We have already indicated that atheism may be considered, in this specialized sense, a religion. See Reed v. Great Lakes Cos., 330 F.3d 931, 934 (7th Cir. 2003) ('If we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion.')"

I'm glad I can teach you something every day.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Semi-sane, "I KNOW NOSSING" Markle, our resident racist, wrote:


"I would believe, that someone of your stature, so proud of the depth and breadth of your knowledge about faith and God would know that Atheism is a religion. You know, just like Episcopalian, Mormon, Baptist, Catholic or perhaps you're more aligned with Muslims?"


Webster's Dictionary definition:

atheist




noun athe·ist \ˈā-thē-ist\


: a person who believes that God does not exist


religion




noun re·li·gion \ri-ˈli-jən\

: the belief in a god or in a group of gods


Clearly, if we use the English language as a medium, I understand the difference between atheism and religion, and you do not.

Like I said, I'm surprised you don't keep up with events effecting your religion.  I'm NOT surprised that I know more about your religion than you.

From the US Supreme Court:
"We have already indicated that atheism may be considered, in this specialized sense, a religion. See Reed v. Great Lakes Cos., 330 F.3d 931, 934 (7th Cir. 2003) ('If we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion.')"

I'm glad I can teach you something every day.  


Just what was the "specialized sense" referred to in your partial quote?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

You are, in fact, partially right -- in the specific sense of the lawsuit I quote from below, an atheist has the same rights of protection from an employer as a fervent follower of an organized religion;

"Title VII does forbid an employer, unless it is a religious organization, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1; Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. Amos, 483 U.S. 327, 329-30, 107 S.Ct. 2862, 97 L.Ed.2d 273 (1987), which Great Lakes is not, to discriminate against an employee on the basis of the employee's religion. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). And for these purposes, as assumed by the parties, as strongly intimated in EEOC v. Townley Engineering & Mfg. Co., 859 F.2d 610, 613-14 n. 5 (9th Cir.1988), and Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Ass'n, 509 F.2d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1975), and as supported by analogy to cases under the free-exercise clause of the First Amendment, County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, 492 U.S. 573, 589-90, 109 S.Ct. 3086, 106 L.Ed.2d 472 (1989); Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 52-53, 105 S.Ct. 2479, 86 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985); Books v. City of Elkhart, 235 F.3d 292, 307 (7th Cir.2000) Warner v. Orange County Dep't of Probation, 173 F.3d 120, 120-22 (2d Cir.1999)—cases which hold that religious freedom includes the freedom to reject religion—"religion" includes antipathy to religion. And so an atheist (which Reed may or may not be) cannot be fired because his employer dislikes atheists. If we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion."

In simple terms, the court determined that an atheist has the same legal protections as a member of any other religion.


But before you have a masturbatory orgasm, the English definition of an atheist is one who does not believe in a god entity.

Come to think of it, there would be no reason for atheism if nobody believed in God.  I look forward to the end of a need for atheism with genuine enthusiasm.



I'm an atheist now, for sure, 100%.  The concept of an omnipotent character, floating around somewhere up, or down there, is one with particular appeal, it would seem, only to insecure people, to whom fairies, devils, evil spirits and voodoo have similar mystical meaning and power.  That's you, Semi-Sane, "I KNOW NOSSING" Markle.  No doubt you desperately hope your imaginary friend is real.  



And you needn't remind us again that your favored Christian sects are markedly better somehow, than the beliefs of a Muslim.


Considering your overt racism against African Americans, I have a question:  When a good black person dies, does his soul go to the same level of heaven that, say, yours might?  Does god practice equality?  Or do the darkies have to remain on their separate but equal cloud?  And do they or he or it allow Muslims up or down there?  What about Jehovah Witnesses, etc.?


Does God serve pork?

Markle

Markle

It's always fun to get your ire up. You should be careful stimulating your heart like that at your age.

('If we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion.')"

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Markle wrote:It's always fun to get your ire up.  You should be careful stimulating your heart like that at your age.

('If we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion.')"

It's always funny to me to see you defend religious beliefs, when I know for sure through watching what you have said that you have no qualms about being a liar and a propagandist. I don't think Jesus would approve of your lack of compassion and faithlessness.

Vikingwoman



Wordslinger wrote:You are, in fact, partially right -- in the specific sense of the lawsuit I quote from below, an atheist has the same rights of protection from an employer as a fervent follower of an organized religion;

"Title VII does forbid an employer, unless it is a religious organization, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1; Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. Amos, 483 U.S. 327, 329-30, 107 S.Ct. 2862, 97 L.Ed.2d 273 (1987), which Great Lakes is not, to discriminate against an employee on the basis of the employee's religion. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). And for these purposes, as assumed by the parties, as strongly intimated in EEOC v. Townley Engineering & Mfg. Co., 859 F.2d 610, 613-14 n. 5 (9th Cir.1988), and Young v. Southwestern Savings & Loan Ass'n, 509 F.2d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1975), and as supported by analogy to cases under the free-exercise clause of the First Amendment, County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, 492 U.S. 573, 589-90, 109 S.Ct. 3086, 106 L.Ed.2d 472 (1989); Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 52-53, 105 S.Ct. 2479, 86 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985); Books v. City of Elkhart, 235 F.3d 292, 307 (7th Cir.2000) Warner v. Orange County Dep't of Probation, 173 F.3d 120, 120-22 (2d Cir.1999)—cases which hold that religious freedom includes the freedom to reject religion—"religion" includes antipathy to religion. And so an atheist (which Reed may or may not be) cannot be fired because his employer dislikes atheists. If we think of religion as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of religion."

In simple terms, the court determined that an atheist has the same legal protections as a member of any other religion.


But before you have a masturbatory orgasm, the English definition of an atheist is one who does not believe in a god entity.

Come to think of it, there would be no reason for atheism if nobody believed in God.  I look forward to the end of a need for atheism with genuine enthusiasm.



I'm an atheist now, for sure, 100%.  The concept of an omnipotent character, floating around somewhere up, or down there, is one with particular appeal, it would seem, only to insecure people, to whom fairies, devils, evil spirits and voodoo have similar mystical meaning and power.  That's you, Semi-Sane, "I KNOW NOSSING" Markle.  No doubt you desperately hope your imaginary friend is real.  



And you needn't remind us again that your favored Christian sects are markedly better somehow, than the beliefs of a Muslim.


Considering your overt racism against African Americans, I have a question:  When a good black person dies, does his soul go to the same level of heaven that, say, yours might?  Does god practice equality?  Or do the darkies have to remain on their separate but equal cloud?  And do they or he or it allow Muslims up or down there?  What about Jehovah Witnesses, etc.?


Does God serve pork?

LMAO!!! I'm still laughing!

Markle

Markle

LMAO!!! I'm still laughing!

Who would be surprised?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
LMAO!!! I'm still laughing!

Who would be surprised?


Once again, since you assume authority in every subject, does God practice equality in heaven?  Or do black souls have to stay on their separate but equal cloud?

And does God serve pork?  I'd really like to hear the reality as you see it.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 3 of 10]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Update: 11/22/2016 WHY does our resident, proud Heathen, Wordslinger, spend so much time posting about...religion.

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum