http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/NATL-CIA-Director-Petraeus-Resigns-Cites-Extra-Marital-Affair-178159541.html
Is the timing on this suspect?
Is the timing on this suspect?
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Nekochan wrote:http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/NATL-CIA-Director-Petraeus-Resigns-Cites-Extra-Marital-Affair-178159541.html
Is the timing on this suspect?
Nekochan wrote:Not that I am aware of, but if the affair has been going on for some time and/or if he has a history of affairs, then I find the timing interesting.
There is no way a man in his position could have carried on an affair in total secrecy...there were people who knew about this before this week.
Last edited by Nekochan on 11/9/2012, 6:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
salinsky wrote:What's interesting about the timing?
Nekochan wrote:salinsky wrote:What's interesting about the timing?
He was due to testify next week. Now, he's not. Why isn't he? Maybe the timing on this is a coincidence. I just asked the question, that's all. I don't know the answer.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83649.html
Nekochan wrote:Crazy? There is nothing crazy about questioning the timing of such revelations. From revelations about Bill Clinton's affairs, George Bush's DUI arrest days before the election, to Herman Cain's long time "girlfriend" --there is nothing crazy about questioning the timing of this kind of revelation.
Nekochan wrote:There is nothing crazy about it. Unlike what you suggested, this isn't a conspiracy theory.
Nekochan wrote:
He was due to testify next week. Now, he's not. Why isn't he?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83649.html
salinsky wrote:Nekochan wrote:
He was due to testify next week. Now, he's not. Why isn't he?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83649.html
Who would be interested in keeping him from testifying?
Nekochan wrote:salinsky wrote:Nekochan wrote:
He was due to testify next week. Now, he's not. Why isn't he?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83649.html
Who would be interested in keeping him from testifying?
I don't know. Maybe someone in the CIA. Or maybe the timing is just a coincidence.
nadalfan wrote:Nekochan wrote:salinsky wrote:Nekochan wrote:
He was due to testify next week. Now, he's not. Why isn't he?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83649.html
Who would be interested in keeping him from testifying?
I don't know. Maybe someone in the CIA. Or maybe the timing is just a coincidence.
Mike Morell will be testifying instead
salinsky wrote:What's interesting about the timing?
Nekochan wrote:The biographer was "embedded" with the General in Afghanistan. She is married, herself, with a couple of kids. Look at the problems this affair has brought onto both of them and their families.
Yes, the timing is interesting. The timing is always interesting on something like this when someone is about to testify, is running for office, etc.
And this is an excuse?Dreamsglore wrote:Have you seen Pertraeus' wife? She looks like his mother. What a frump!
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|