Despite recent Supreme Court ruling, the religious continue to oppress the LGBT community under "god's authority"

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Paul the Apostle was a Roman citizen and each time the Jews tried to have him killed he appealed to that fact and they couldn't touch him....he wound up tried in Rome and beheaded but not before he spreading the gospel throughout Rome....you could say this government woman is doing the same thing before she's terminated by the state.....You guys are free to believe whatever slop sloshes around in your skull...afford us the same freedom.

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Paul the Apostle was a Roman citizen and each time the Jews tried to have him killed he appealed to that fact and they couldn't touch him....he wound up tried in Rome and beheaded but not before he spreading the gospel throughout Rome....you could say this government woman is doing the same thing before she's terminated by the state.....You guys are free to believe whatever slop sloshes around in your skull...afford us the same freedom.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Paul the Apostle was a Roman citizen and each time the Jews tried to have him killed he appealed to that fact and they couldn't touch him....he wound up tried in Rome and beheaded but not before he spreading the gospel throughout Rome....you could say this government woman is doing the same thing before she's terminated by the state.....You guys are free to believe whatever slop sloshes around in your skull...afford us the same freedom.

Equal rights to what?...get married? They don't need the state license to get married...it's just more pushing the freak envelope like all good little Bolsheviks do trying to destroy a country by revolution and class hatred.

boards of FL wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Paul the Apostle was a Roman citizen and each time the Jews tried to have him killed he appealed to that fact and they couldn't touch him....he wound up tried in Rome and beheaded but not before he spreading the gospel throughout Rome....you could say this government woman is doing the same thing before she's terminated by the state.....You guys are free to believe whatever slop sloshes around in your skull...afford us the same freedom.

Equal rights to what?...get married? They don't need the state license to get married...it's just more pushing the freak envelope like all good little Bolsheviks do trying to destroy a country by revolution and class hatred.

They need the state license or order to receive the benefits of marriage.  Here again, if you don't know what you're talking about - which you clearly don't - why inject your opinion at all?

TEOTWAWKI wrote:http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/marriage-clerk-cites-gods-authority-to-defy-federal-court/

'Red-eyed and shaking' homosexuals leave county office without license

Salinsky wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/marriage-clerk-cites-gods-authority-to-defy-federal-court/

'Red-eyed and shaking' homosexuals leave county office without license

Does that make you happy, T?

Does discrimination make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside?

PkrBum wrote:The govt shouldn't be providing any "benefit" to anyone's marriage. Record and arbitrator at dissolution is it.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:The govt shouldn't be providing any "benefit" to anyone's marriage. Record and arbitrator at dissolution is it.

Many companies offer health insurance for an employee's spouse.   Hospitals at times will only allow family visits.  Etc. Etc.

These are benefits to marriage that can only be obtained by way of a marriage license - which, unfortunately for humanity, many Americans still cannot obtain in the 21st century due to a population of people who have been indoctrinated into an incredibly immoral mythology that dates back to the bronze age.

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:The govt shouldn't be providing any "benefit" to anyone's marriage. Record and arbitrator at dissolution is it.

Many companies offer health insurance for an employee's spouse.   Hospitals at times will only allow family visits.  Etc.  Etc.  

These are benefits to marriage that can only be obtained by way of a marriage license - which, unfortunately for humanity, many Americans still cannot obtain in the 21st century due to a population of people who have been indoctrinated into an incredibly immoral mythology that dates back to the bronze age.

Nature is immoral mythology now? Lol... you can marry your fucking dog for all I care... good luck getting benefits.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:The govt shouldn't be providing any "benefit" to anyone's marriage. Record and arbitrator at dissolution is it.

Many companies offer health insurance for an employee's spouse.   Hospitals at times will only allow family visits.  Etc.  Etc.  

These are benefits to marriage that can only be obtained by way of a marriage license - which, unfortunately for humanity, many Americans still cannot obtain in the 21st century due to a population of people who have been indoctrinated into an incredibly immoral mythology that dates back to the bronze age.

Nature is immoral mythology now? Lol... you can marry your fucking dog for all I care... good luck getting benefits.

No.  Nature is not immoral mythology.  If that is the conclusion that you reached after reading my post, you're either functionally illiterate, stupid, or both.  The immoral mythology is obviously the religion that the people of the clerks office were indoctrinated into.

If you're not going to respond directly to my post, why quote me and then proceed to waste bandwidth at all?

Salinsky wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Jail ? for what?   Authorize another clerk to issue the license and stop making a federal case out of it....You guys would force a Muslim to eat pork

Contempt of court, of course.

Duh ...

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:The govt shouldn't be providing any "benefit" to anyone's marriage. Record and arbitrator at dissolution is it.

Many companies offer health insurance for an employee's spouse.   Hospitals at times will only allow family visits.  Etc.  Etc.  

These are benefits to marriage that can only be obtained by way of a marriage license - which, unfortunately for humanity, many Americans still cannot obtain in the 21st century due to a population of people who have been indoctrinated into an incredibly immoral mythology that dates back to the bronze age.

Nature is immoral mythology now? Lol... you can marry your fucking dog for all I care... good luck getting benefits.

No.  Nature is not immoral mythology.  If that is the conclusion that you reached after reading my post, you're either functionally illiterate, stupid, or both.  The immoral mythology is obviously the religion that the people of the clerks office were indoctrinated into.

If you're not going to respond directly to my post, why quote me and then proceed to waste bandwidth at all?

You took it that my objection was religious... It's you that must be slow.

Salinsky wrote:

Her fifteen minutes have expired.

She needs to go to jail now.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:The govt shouldn't be providing any "benefit" to anyone's marriage. Record and arbitrator at dissolution is it.

Many companies offer health insurance for an employee's spouse.   Hospitals at times will only allow family visits.  Etc.  Etc.  

These are benefits to marriage that can only be obtained by way of a marriage license - which, unfortunately for humanity, many Americans still cannot obtain in the 21st century due to a population of people who have been indoctrinated into an incredibly immoral mythology that dates back to the bronze age.

Nature is immoral mythology now? Lol... you can marry your fucking dog for all I care... good luck getting benefits.

No.  Nature is not immoral mythology.  If that is the conclusion that you reached after reading my post, you're either functionally illiterate, stupid, or both.  The immoral mythology is obviously the religion that the people of the clerks office were indoctrinated into.

If you're not going to respond directly to my post, why quote me and then proceed to waste bandwidth at all?

You took it that my objection was religious... It's you that must be slow.

I didn't take anything as anything.   You misinterpreted my comment - either out of stupidity or intellectual dishonesty.  I merely pointed that out.

That said, have you anything to say directly in response to my comment or not?   You said that government should not provide benefit to anyone based on marriage.  I pointed out ways in which marriage is required in order to receive other benefits in the private sector.  This is now the point where you either acknowledge that, offer a counter argument, or do neither but still quote me and look like an idiot.

Should I put you down for the latter?  Of course.

2seaoat wrote:A true Christian will always follow the Book even if it means death.


I guess I will have to pass on trimming my beard......Leviticus 19:27

Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard.



The pulled pork sandwich is probably not going to happen.....this death stuff and belief.....well Matthew 6 works for me....don't listen to the hypocrites.....god communicates directly....


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

This guy claimed to teach fair housing law.....heck....he does not even understand simple constitutional concepts....but I guess those part timers actually though you knew what you were talking about.

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:The govt shouldn't be providing any "benefit" to anyone's marriage. Record and arbitrator at dissolution is it.

Many companies offer health insurance for an employee's spouse.   Hospitals at times will only allow family visits.  Etc.  Etc.  

These are benefits to marriage that can only be obtained by way of a marriage license - which, unfortunately for humanity, many Americans still cannot obtain in the 21st century due to a population of people who have been indoctrinated into an incredibly immoral mythology that dates back to the bronze age.

Nature is immoral mythology now? Lol... you can marry your fucking dog for all I care... good luck getting benefits.

No.  Nature is not immoral mythology.  If that is the conclusion that you reached after reading my post, you're either functionally illiterate, stupid, or both.  The immoral mythology is obviously the religion that the people of the clerks office were indoctrinated into.

If you're not going to respond directly to my post, why quote me and then proceed to waste bandwidth at all?

You took it that my objection was religious... It's you that must be slow.

I didn't take anything as anything.   You misinterpreted my comment - either out of stupidity or intellectual dishonesty.  I merely pointed that out.

That said, have you anything to say directly in response to my comment or not?   You said that government should not provide benefit to anyone based on marriage.  I pointed out ways in which marriage is required in order to receive other benefits in the private sector.  This is now the point where you either acknowledge that, offer a counter argument, or do neither but still quote me and look like an idiot.

Should I put you down for the latter?  Of course.

You want to use the govt to force private companies to provide marriage benefits to homosexuals... I see similarities between that and using religion to deny govt protections/rights or special privileges like tax breaks for marriage, kids, inheritance... etc. Y'all can all pound sand.  Hence my desire to remove govt benefits. The sooner the govt doesn't take gender, race, wealth... etc into account the sooner we can actually have equal opportunity. Everytime the govt is endowed with the power to "fix" a perceived/subjective  social problem... you can bet for damn sure  it will be used for solutions you eventually won't agree with. You're part of the problem... certainly not a sustainable solution. Humans don't need to be socially engineered and domesticated... we evolve naturally and become enlightened as we do. Ya frickin nazis.

boards of FL wrote:

Let's say that the ECUA bill is in my wife's name and I need to make an inquiry.  I'll have access to that since I am the spouse of the person whose name is on the account.  Let's say my wife is in the hospital and I want to visit during hours where only family members are allowed to visit.  There again, I'll have access since my wife and I are legally married.