How can a national labor unionor the president gut a supreme court ruling?

In the steamrolling style that is now the hallmark of the Obama administration and its extensions, the NLRB voted 3-1 to gut the Supreme Court’s 1988 Communication Workers of America v. Beck decision, whereby union workers in non-right-to-work states were able to withhold the portion of their dues that unions spend on political activism. The NLRB now allows that unions no longer are required to provide proof, through audits of their finances, to so-called “Beck objectors” that their money is not spent on union politics.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/12/29/NLRB-Plays-Santa-To-Unions

This seems very illegal to me?

It is a mystery of how a labor union and a president can change supreme court rulings.

I guess we just allow supreme court rulings to be altered at discretion. hmm

The only people following laws these days are the servants not the masters