in your case the employer would most likely not be obliged due to the image the employer wanted to convey in the wearing of specific clothing,ie,uniforms.
Your statement is exactly opposite of the law. It is old law, but let me help you with a recent case. Please read it and see if you can understand the mistake of your above statement.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/01/us-usa-court-scarf-idUSKBN0OH2NW20150601
Note that you and judge Thomas agree.....not very good company.
Your statement is exactly opposite of the law. It is old law, but let me help you with a recent case. Please read it and see if you can understand the mistake of your above statement.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/01/us-usa-court-scarf-idUSKBN0OH2NW20150601
Note that you and judge Thomas agree.....not very good company.