Bullshit! He still has to show his DL and registration. There is protocol as to when she calls for a supervisor. He had the duty to show his driving credentials
when asked.
when asked.
2seaoat wrote:As a community leader who stated that he had been stopped many times, but more importantly a s a citizen, he had every right to ask why he was stopped. He did EXACTLY the right thing when he asked for a supervisor. I did not see that truck break ANY law, yet the officer without probable cause followed that citizen and was strident and out of control. Some people have NO business being a police officer. When he asked to speak to a supervisor she became argumentative....he broke NO laws, and when people get acclimated to living in a police state they cannot act like the free and independent citizens of a Republic, but become indentured servants to the power structure.
He was right. How many times have each of you been stopped by LEO this year......and after being stopped were you speeding or doing something against the law........It is about time people stand their ground as citizens, and ask for supervisors.....The Supreme Court in just this session has again condemned out of control traffic stops which have NO basis.......it does not matter black or white.......probable cause of a crime is the threshold.....and as Scalia has said for the last 10 years.....they will not find constitutional stops in fishing expeditions......Enough!
T your values are not color blind.
SheWrites wrote:The truck was driving along with a cop car behind him and they just decide to randomly check out his tag?
What reason?
Do you mean to tell me when a policemen is behind me on the road they are checking out my tag?
Something ain't right here...they go over and check the windows or door on both sides of the truck and then return with a paper to give to him.
What was that all about?
Looks flaky to me.
2seaoat wrote:We have all been stopped, but I disagree completely. I was returning from Disneyworld and the kids were sleeping in the back. My wife was laying down on the arm rest and talking to me as to how far was it till we were home......I told her where we were, and then I mention to her we were being followed by a police car.....it followed us for a mile and then turned his lights on......it was 1:30 am on a Saturday night and I was wearing a baseball cap and appeared to be in the car alone. I pull over and the officer approaches and says I was going 41 in a 35 mph zone....my wife pops up and the kids pop up and my wife says Seaoat......I watched the speedometer and you never went above 30mph since the police officer was following us. So I ask the officer where I was speeding and he tells us a spot which was about three hundred yards behind us......I was not speeding and my wife and I both knew it. He comes back to the car and wants me to sign the citation. I say no. You just did a profile stop for drunk drivers and you thought I was a single male in a vehicle on a saturday night after 1:30 am and you had NO legal justification for this stop and my wife and I can confirm at no time was I speeding.......he says I get bored and I break up the evening doing investigatory stops......I said your stop was bad and you need to take me to jail......he gets on the radio and calls in that I will not sign the citation and want to go to jail.....the lady goes I know Seaoat and he is a great guy........now he comes back to the vehicle realizing he is in deep chit, and he tries the sympathy routine.....it has been a long night.......I need to break it up......so can you just go along with me on this and sign........I said no, I want to talk to the Judge-----------when he does bond call and explain that an officer is out of control(he had just won an award for the most DUI arrest in the county), and at that point he goes over to my wife and starts pleading with her to convince me to sign the citation, and I will never forget, he was not speeding, he is a big boy, put him in jail if you think you are right, but I will testify that he never went over 30mph.....He tells us that we better show up at court on this date....I do not sign......and he tells me I was being a jerk......the case was thrown out and my lawyer told me that the judge was fully familiar with this officers methods.....thrown out......unless citizens stand their ground we cannot stop this police state from destroying America.....I found Nothing inappropriate about the citizen's request for a supervisor.....he asked why he was stopped and was given a totally wrong answer.....he needed a supervisor there. Then she alone escalated the situation when all she had to do as any trained and intelligent officer would have done is return to the squad and get the supervisor.
2seaoat wrote:Lot of time on your hands today?
You read me like a book. The bobcat blew a hydraulic seal and it will take me a week to fix it, and I tried to have my wife help me raise my Flagpole and new American flag, but I am too damn weak to lift it up so the flagpole is half way up sitting on a step ladder as I am getting the lull ready to lift it, but this requires a cage, safety harnesses, and putting my wife up in the air in cage as I raise the flag......it would have been so much easier with the bobcat.....but I have NEVER been more proud to raise the flag, and I will get it done and post the photo.....I have never been prouder of this great country, and that flag means a great deal to me.....so yea....more time than I expected last week.
2seaoat wrote:Sorry, not when he clearly said call the supervisor, I want a supervisor.......I can be stopped and when I question the authority for a stop and ask for a supervisor, I have not shown non compliance as you are asserting, I am asking for simple verification of authority which is an ABSOLUTE RIGHT, and it is not qualified by my failure to show that officer my identification when I have asked for supervision......
You have already established you are unfamiliar with the protocols and now you are asserting that when a person exercises an absolute right, you can arrest him for asking for a supervisor because he wants to know your authority.....you could not be more wrong......Guarantee you she gets a letter in her file and it has NOTHING to do with who this person was. Now I would agree with you 100% if this person never asked to speak to a supervisor and told her he would not provide his identification. Then and only then would she have the right to arrest him. She had NO right to arrest him once he reasonably asked for a supervisor, and he clearly made it known that he had been stopped multiple times without reasons, and he wanted to talk to a supervisor......this is crystal clear and your interpretation is wrong, and only correct if he never asked for the supervisor.....he is an intelligent citizen who asked the right question.
2seaoat wrote:I did.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|