Would Chris Christy cause a traffic jam for political retribution?

Bob wrote:Christie's gonna give a press conference at 10 AM (central).  This oughta be entertaining.

Chrissy wrote:oh for fucks sake. how stupid is this. my god im gonna go down and cause a traffic jam today on i41 to piss off all the buses in the area. and then anything negative that happens in the area is my fault just because its not like a traffic jam ever occurs on its own from things like accidents, road construction etc...

I don't like chris so I wont vote for him anyway. but this is stupid.

Dreamsglore wrote: Intentionally causing a traffic jam for four hours and putting people lives at risk is wholly unacceptable and inexcusable.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:oh for fucks sake. how stupid is this. my god im gonna go down and cause a traffic jam today on i41 to piss off all the buses in the area. and then anything negative that happens in the area is my fault just because its not like a traffic jam ever occurs on its own from things like accidents, road construction etc...

I don't like chris so I wont vote for him anyway. but this is stupid.

No, this is why you're stupid and a moron. Intentionally causing a traffic jam for four hours and putting people lives at risk is wholly unacceptable and inexcusable.

PkrBum wrote:

How do you feel about supplying high powered weapons to criminal cartels that resulted in numerous deaths?

Would you support a full and open investigation that disclosed those responsible and held  them accountable?

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:oh for fucks sake. how stupid is this. my god im gonna go down and cause a traffic jam today on i41 to piss off all the buses in the area. and then anything negative that happens in the area is my fault just because its not like a traffic jam ever occurs on its own from things like accidents, road construction etc...

I don't like chris so I wont vote for him anyway. but this is stupid.

No, this is why you're stupid and a moron. Intentionally causing a traffic jam for four hours and putting people lives at risk is wholly unacceptable and inexcusable.

How do you feel about supplying high powered weapons to criminal cartels that resulted in numerous deaths?

Would you support a full and open investigation that disclosed those responsible and held  them accountable?

PkrBum wrote:Just wait until healthcare workers are nationalized.

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:oh for fucks sake. how stupid is this. my god im gonna go down and cause a traffic jam today on i41 to piss off all the buses in the area. and then anything negative that happens in the area is my fault just because its not like a traffic jam ever occurs on its own from things like accidents, road construction etc...

I don't like chris so I wont vote for him anyway. but this is stupid.

No, this is why you're stupid and a moron. Intentionally causing a traffic jam for four hours and putting people lives at risk is wholly unacceptable and inexcusable.

How do you feel about supplying high powered weapons to criminal cartels that resulted in numerous deaths?

Would you support a full and open investigation that disclosed those responsible and held  them accountable?

So you're trying to justify this by bringing up another travesty?

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:oh for fucks sake. how stupid is this. my god im gonna go down and cause a traffic jam today on i41 to piss off all the buses in the area. and then anything negative that happens in the area is my fault just because its not like a traffic jam ever occurs on its own from things like accidents, road construction etc...

I don't like chris so I wont vote for him anyway. but this is stupid.

No, this is why you're stupid and a moron. Intentionally causing a traffic jam for four hours and putting people lives at risk is wholly unacceptable and inexcusable.

How do you feel about supplying high powered weapons to criminal cartels that resulted in numerous deaths?

Would you support a full and open investigation that disclosed those responsible and held  them accountable?

So you're trying to justify this by bringing up another travesty?

Justify? LOL... I want full cooperation, disclosure, and investigation in both... do you? Or allow one a full pass?

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Chrissy wrote:oh for fucks sake. how stupid is this. my god im gonna go down and cause a traffic jam today on i41 to piss off all the buses in the area. and then anything negative that happens in the area is my fault just because its not like a traffic jam ever occurs on its own from things like accidents, road construction etc...

I don't like chris so I wont vote for him anyway. but this is stupid.

No, this is why you're stupid and a moron. Intentionally causing a traffic jam for four hours and putting people lives at risk is wholly unacceptable and inexcusable.

How do you feel about supplying high powered weapons to criminal cartels that resulted in numerous deaths?

Would you support a full and open investigation that disclosed those responsible and held  them accountable?

So you're trying to justify this by bringing up another travesty?

Justify? LOL... I want full cooperation, disclosure, and investigation in both... do you? Or allow one a full pass?

The subject is Chris Christy's involvement in the traffic tie-up of the busiest bridge in America.

Obviously Christy is in the wrong, terribly wrong.

What the hell drives you that you have to turn this into a partisan issue? There's lots about Obama that's wrong. NOBODY should get a pass.

How about sending Bush and Cheney to Gitmo for interrogation and punishment? Shit. Now you've got me doing it!

Wordslinger wrote:

How about sending Bush and Cheney to Gitmo for interrogation and punishment?  Shit.  Now you've got me doing it!

PkrBum wrote:
Would you support a full and open investigation that disclosed those responsible and held  them accountable?

Bob wrote:

The ants aren't hurting anybody so why launch them into space.  Send all those dirtbag politicians in their place.

stormwatch89 wrote:Pkr is on target as always. Let Cristy pay if he did the "no no". But, let Obama do the same.

Partisan politics have led us to this emotional war and I would hope that we all can try to decide what is best for the Country.

Yes, we disagree as to whether the amount of National Debt, supporting those who cannot or do not wish to support themselves has a priority.

We all have different opinions and hope that we are allowed to keep them.

But.... As Pkr says, it must be equally applied.

Sal wrote:

PkrBum wrote:
Would you support a full and open investigation that disclosed those responsible and held  them accountable?

By "open investigation", I suppose you're referring to the transparent witch-hunts in which Issa has been involved.

Those circuses where he has repeatedly leaked partial, misleading, and erroneous information in an effort to embarrass the administration?

I guess you think we have an honest broker in Issa?

You'd get a sympathetic ear from me if you suggested that government should have no classified information.

I think you'd agree, however, that has as much chance of happening as the rest of your libertarian ideals.

Unfortunately, in the absence of that there will always be arguments over what material should be rightfully classified.

stormwatch89 wrote:Pkr is on target as always.  Let Cristy pay if he did the "no no".  But, let Obama do the same.

Partisan politics have led us to this emotional war and I would hope that we all can try to decide what is best for the Country.

Yes, we disagree as to whether the amount of National Debt, supporting those who cannot or do not wish to support themselves has a priority.

We all have different opinions and hope that we are allowed to keep them.

But.... As Pkr says, it must be equally applied.

Floridatexan wrote:

stormwatch89 wrote:Pkr is on target as always.  Let Cristy pay if he did the "no no".  But, let Obama do the same.

Partisan politics have led us to this emotional war and I would hope that we all can try to decide what is best for the Country.

Yes, we disagree as to whether the amount of National Debt, supporting those who cannot or do not wish to support themselves has a priority.

We all have different opinions and hope that we are allowed to keep them.

But.... As Pkr says, it must be equally applied.

I notice you left out the elephant in the room...actually more than one elephant...yet you call for non-partisanship.  And in the face of the largest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top of the heap since the Great Depression...over the past 30 years, with the bulk of that transfer occurring during Republican administrations... you have the unmitigated gall to talk about people who you perceive "do not wish" to support themselves.  And the answer to the near crash of 2008?  Austerity, of course.  Why should we spend money just because 50% of the population is hungry, or homeless, or worried, or sick?  
It's their fault, right?  They should have planned better, shouldn't have bitten off more than they could chew?  Uh, nooooooooooooooo...the long and the short of it is that the "financiers" created a separate economy that grew just like a cancer on the real bread and butter economy and gutted it.  And ordinary working people paid the price.  It was the "trickle down" economic policies of Reagan that started the trend, which was continued under both Bush administrations, and to some extent under Clinton.  But the GOP has been largely responsible...by creating a laissez-faire business climate and worshiping at the feet of the sacred bull on Wall Street.