Worried about my children

Joanimaroni wrote:Seaoat...I agree with you we have a troll posting a hoax on the forum.

No credibility.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Nekochan wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:Good call, Seaoat.

I think so too.  A typical new wife is going to want to spend some alone time with her new husband, not take care of his kids full time.

You can bet your bippy the new wife doesn't want it. This is about child support.

Lurch wrote:If it's joint custody nobody pays, If he gets custody she pays him..

Lurch wrote:If it's joint custody nobody pays, If he gets custody she pays him..

2seaoat wrote:It doesn't seem to be about child support and I believe that Seaoat and Joani are right. If they do currently have joint custody he wouldn't be paying full child support anyway, would he?


bingo.......the writing style and logic, make it clear to me who the sock is.....unable to even tie the loose ends confirms it for me........the reference to me as being old.....cinches the deal....please note the strategic use of capitals........

I love it.....I am using my real name....not my married name.....when I plug her name in the system, and guess what.....nothing.......but good catch Neko....I am poor...I have no lawyer.......but nobody pays child support......

2seaoat wrote:It doesn't seem to be about child support and I believe that Seaoat and Joani are right. If they do currently have joint custody he wouldn't be paying full child support anyway, would he?


bingo.......the writing style and logic, make it clear to me who the sock is.....unable to even tie the loose ends confirms it for me........the reference to me as being old.....cinches the deal....please note the strategic use of capitals........

I love it.....I am using my real name....not my married name.....when I plug her name in the system, and guess what.....nothing.......but good catch Neko....I am poor...I have no lawyer.......but nobody pays child support......

Joanimaroni wrote:

Lurch wrote:If it's joint custody nobody pays, If he gets custody she pays him..

...and it would be based on her income. She already said he is rich and she is poor.

this is a fake story.

Nekochan wrote:

2seaoat wrote:It doesn't seem to be about child support and I believe that Seaoat and Joani are right. If they do currently have joint custody he wouldn't be paying full child support anyway, would he?


bingo.......the writing style and logic, make it clear to me who the sock is.....unable to even tie the loose ends confirms it for me........the reference to me as being old.....cinches the deal....please note the strategic use of capitals........

I love it.....I am using my real name....not my married name.....when I plug her name in the system, and guess what.....nothing.......but good catch Neko....I am poor...I have no lawyer.......but nobody pays child support......

Give me another hint.  I don't know who it is, but you caught on to them pretty fast.

deniselep wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Lurch wrote:If it's joint custody nobody pays, If he gets custody she pays him..

...and it would be based on her income. She already said he is rich and she is poor.

this is a fake story.

Are you people dense ? It's NOT about child support...it's about CUSTODY !

The only thing fake on this forum are the fake names that you all hide behind, passing anonymous judgement on others. You sneaked down here in this pit of fake names when the PNJ forced everybody to reveal themselves. You lack the courage to speak out as who you are....and I can see why. Forgive me for intruding upon your little cabal of masked critics and holier-than-thou hypocrites. I would say that I hope that you never get caught up in a situation like mine, but, as I said before you're a bunch of tired old people and I'm sure, or at least I hope, that your children have moved on and prospered in spite of the narrow-minded upbringing they must have received. I also hope that somewhere they found more courage than that they witnessed from their role models.

Have a nice day. I'll leave you to your misery ,fear and self-loathing.

deniselep wrote:

Nekochan wrote:

2seaoat wrote:It doesn't seem to be about child support and I believe that Seaoat and Joani are right. If they do currently have joint custody he wouldn't be paying full child support anyway, would he?


bingo.......the writing style and logic, make it clear to me who the sock is.....unable to even tie the loose ends confirms it for me........the reference to me as being old.....cinches the deal....please note the strategic use of capitals........

I love it.....I am using my real name....not my married name.....when I plug her name in the system, and guess what.....nothing.......but good catch Neko....I am poor...I have no lawyer.......but nobody pays child support......

Give me another hint.  I don't know who it is, but you caught on to them pretty fast.

Morons...how many "Denise" people are there. You people are a joke...perhaps you should search for "2seaoat" or "joanimaroni"...nope, nothing found.

deniselep wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Lurch wrote:If it's joint custody nobody pays, If he gets custody she pays him..

...and it would be based on her income. She already said he is rich and she is poor.

this is a fake story.

Are you people dense ? It's NOT about child support...it's about CUSTODY !

The only thing fake on this forum are the fake names that you all hide behind, passing anonymous judgement on others. You sneaked down here in this pit of fake names when the PNJ forced everybody to reveal themselves. You lack the courage to speak out as who you are....and I can see why. Forgive me for intruding upon your little cabal of masked critics and holier-than-thou hypocrites. I would say that I hope that you never get caught up in a situation like mine, but, as I said before you're a bunch of tired old people and I'm sure, or at least I hope, that your children have moved on and prospered in spite of the narrow-minded upbringing they must have received. I also hope that somewhere they found more courage than that they witnessed from their role models.

Have a nice day. I'll leave you to your misery ,fear and self-loathing.

2seaoat wrote:Your statement about ping pong balls is accurate.  That's why I believe any rational judge wouldn't upset the apple cart here. 

Let see I have been told to give it a break.....that I am a shit head.....and the person who started the thread says I am a troll.   So everybody thinks a rational judge would not want to upset the apple cart........Have I landed in the twilight zone.   What freaking judge is going to have no child support......no residential custody.......no joint parenting agreement setting out parameters......and thinks that folks going through a divorce are going to be more rational.......more lucid.....more concerned about the best interests of the kids after being married to each other.......surprise surprise that one of the parties does not think this is good for the kids......gee....this arrangement is the definition of insanity...more stable without the weekly switch...I find this entire thread incredible....sorry....we get a hate the judge thread linked to the start of the thread.....and then we are told this incredible story about the current arrangement, and I am scolded.....I have never heard of this arrangement.....and the truth is that if this is true......somebody needs to get a lawyer ASAP and get some help from family and church because this is going to be a mess,  the lawyer or judge who approved this arrangement went brain dead.....or this is pure fantasy......what happens if one of the parties gets a job over at orange beach and decides to move.....are the parties going to move close enough to have the kids go to the same school.....am I the only one who sees how utterly absurd this thread is........

Dreamsglore wrote:I believe you are all wrong and owe this woman an apology. Especially Seaoat. He's not as smart as he thinks he is. My daughter and ex son in law also have a marital settlement agreement. Neither one pays child support. My granddaugter spends one week at her fathers and one at her mothers. Both have equal custody.

Now as for Ms. Denise. Does your last name has the intials yel in it but not in that order? If so, I know who you are as I have helped you in the distant past. If you think you know who I am or where I work don't say it here on the forum. There are some spitful and evil people here. PM me. If she is who I think she is she is not a troll or sock.

2seaoat wrote:My daughter and her ex have the same arraignment

By golly.....why am I not surprised.......

2seaoat wrote:Now, we have Oats trashing up the place with his narcissistic armchair quarterback expertise.

I think we all know who the person who created the sock on this thread.....my initial guess was confirmed.....I will not repeat to anyone else who the person is, and I have received PM with folks suggesting who the imposter was......I could create a sock.....and in three weeks not one person on this forum would have any doubt who I am......this thread was obvious, and equally sad in its own right.......but at least we know that kids are not at risk.

2seaoat wrote:And I didn't create her so any of you nutjobs who think that is the case can go jump off a bridge.

The PMs I have received, it is agreed that most folks are going to simply close this thread without accusations.....nothing productive comes out of the same.