My answer to Dreams

riceme wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Nekochan wrote:Oh...lol, I think he's pulling someone's leg.

That is what most of us think, but he swears he is as serious as a heart attack.

Exactly. Reference this comment on the previous page of this thread:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:
I'm certainly not in the mensa range but average intelligence is around 110 and Mensa is about somewhere 130-140.

No doubt,Rice I'm no fan of... The emotional damage they expend is overwhelming. My sympathy has been stretched beyond it's limits. It's a flaw I will admit.

.../snip/...

...I mean after all... I don't even have to resort to calling you anything to get a rise out of you...

.../snip/...

Nekochan wrote:He thinks you're a religious nut? lol.

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Nekochan wrote:Oh...lol, I think he's pulling someone's leg.

No, he's serious,Neko. He's argued that position vehemently. I find it amusing he thinks I'm a religious nut.Little does he know.

You obviously support Teo and his DOMA position in this matter by choosing to accept the government should have say on who can marry who.

All you have to do is compromise on the issue of mature willing companions being allowed to choose who they can marry and your dreams (pun intended) will be fullfilled...

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMbGgnCWfuc

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Nekochan wrote:Oh...lol, I think he's pulling someone's leg.

No, he's serious,Neko. He's argued that position vehemently. I find it amusing he thinks I'm a religious nut.Little does he know.

Since I am an atheist I certainly am not a religious nut and I think he is a card short of a full deck.

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Nekochan wrote:He thinks you're a religious nut? lol.

They refuse to discuss the issue intelligently and without provocation.

They are no better than the people they call prejudice and discriminating in their hypocrisy.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ljy6PTbX9I

Dreamsglore wrote:
No, I will never say that.There are people who have mental issues and the law needs to intervene.

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Nekochan wrote:Oh...lol, I think he's pulling someone's leg.

No, he's serious,Neko. He's argued that position vehemently. I find it amusing he thinks I'm a religious nut.Little does he know.

Since I am an atheist I certainly am not a religious nut and I think he is a card short of a full deck.

Which makes you just as bigoted as she is.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqXWf_CP52E

Nekochan wrote:
You mean ... the atheists vs the religious nuts?

I think some atheists --especially the socially and politically active ones--absolutely do practice a kind of "religion".

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Then the logical conclusion is that Teo and those who agree with him about DOMA are correct and their bigotry is just as justified as yours.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9JEPeeohYs

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:
I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:
I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

Then perhaps your best option is to stay out of this argument.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hUy9ePyo6Q

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Then the logical conclusion is that Teo and those who agree with him about DOMA are correct and their bigotry is just as justified as yours.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9JEPeeohYs

I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Then the logical conclusion is that Teo and those who agree with him about DOMA are correct and their bigotry is just as justified as yours.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9JEPeeohYs

I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

Hey glad I came snooping over here. So using my name in vain? Defense of marriage act ?...since marriage is only possible between a man and a woman the defense seems easy. Only a fool would try to make a baby by rubbing two dicks together...

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Hey glad I came snooping over here. So using my name in vain? Defense of marriage act ?...since marriage is only possible between a man and a woman the defense seems easy. Only a fool would try to make a baby by rubbing two dicks together...

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Then the logical conclusion is that Teo and those who agree with him about DOMA are correct and their bigotry is just as justified as yours.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9JEPeeohYs

I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

Hey glad I came snooping over here. So using my name in vain? Defense of marriage act ?...since marriage is only possible between a man and a woman the defense seems easy. Only a fool would try to make a baby by rubbing two dicks together...

PBulldog2 wrote:What an interesting thread I started.....

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Then the logical conclusion is that Teo and those who agree with him about DOMA are correct and their bigotry is just as justified as yours.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9JEPeeohYs

I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

Hey glad I came snooping over here. So using my name in vain? Defense of marriage act ?...since marriage is only possible between a man and a woman the defense seems easy. Only a fool would try to make a baby by rubbing two dicks together...

Sal wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Then the logical conclusion is that Teo and those who agree with him about DOMA are correct and their bigotry is just as justified as yours.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9JEPeeohYs

I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

Hey glad I came snooping over here. So using my name in vain? Defense of marriage act ?...since marriage is only possible between a man and a woman the defense seems easy. Only a fool would try to make a baby by rubbing two dicks together...

So making a baby is the criteria for marriage?

Using your logic, old and infertile hetero couples would also be forbidden the sanctity of marriage, amarite?

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Hey glad I came snooping over here. So using my name in vain? Defense of marriage act ?...since marriage is only possible between a man and a woman the defense seems easy. Only a fool would try to make a baby by rubbing two dicks together...

Dreamsglore wrote:

PBulldog2 wrote:What an interesting thread I started.....

You started it so you could be sanctimonious about your own mental health issues. There is always an agenda... besides I don't remember even asking a question.

Sal wrote:So making a baby is the criteria for marriage?

Using your logic, old and infertile hetero couples would also be forbidden the sanctity of marriage, amarite?

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Sal wrote:So making a baby is the criteria for marriage?

Using your logic, old and infertile hetero couples would also be forbidden the sanctity of marriage, amarite?

Then you accept the premise that all mature willing companions should be allowed to marry no matter; how many, who, or what; they choose to form a marriage arrangement with so long as all involved are mature willing companions.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMbGgnCWfuc

Dreamsglore wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Ghost_Rider1 wrote:If I am bigoted to incestuous relationships, that is one bigotry that I will proudly display on my sleeve.

Then the logical conclusion is that Teo and those who agree with him about DOMA are correct and their bigotry is just as justified as yours.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9JEPeeohYs

I do not know what Teo's stance is on DOMA nor does it make a bit of difference because DOMA has not swayed my opinion of an incestuous relationship one iota. I am very capable of forming my own opinions and do not need any outside persuasion to aid me in that determination. Whether it be right or wrong, it is still my opinion and not one that I have parroted.

Hey glad I came snooping over here. So using my name in vain? Defense of marriage act ?...since marriage is only possible between a man and a woman the defense seems easy. Only a fool would try to make a baby by rubbing two dicks together...

LOL! OMG! That made me laugh.