Salinsky wrote:I was simply and accurately describing Trump's supporters, and it was you who attempted to change the subject, as is your want, by drawing a false equivalency.
It's a cheap, third-rate debate tactic, and all too pervasive in our political discourse today.
It allows circus geeks like Trump to be taken seriously, and not laughed out of the arena of ideas as would be entirely appropriate.
And no, Hillary describing the endless and meaningless investigations from Whitewater to Vince Foster to BENGHAZI!! to emailgate ad nauseum as witch hunts, is not the same thing as a Republican strategy to sow in their base seeds of distrust in science and teachers and intellectuals and math.
It's just not.
This is a good time to explain one of the differences between you and me,
Sal.
Remember the other day, when you called bullshit on me because I was ignorant about the federal courts handing down a ruling which took away any authority of the states to enforce the immigration laws?
Do you remember what my response to you on that was?
It was to man up, admit I was wrong and you were right, and then to thank you for setting me straight about it. It was actually verbatim that.
But here's how you operate.
You said republicans/conservatives try to blame their problems on a liberal conspiracy that's out to get them.
My reply called bullshit on that and rightfully so. Because I pointed out to you that the Clintons do the same goddamn thing. Hillary's comment about the "vast right-wing conspiracy" is exactly the same thing.
So how do you respond? You double down on the bullshit and throw out more insults to boot. lol