2seaoat wrote:There is nothin g weird about the current candidates surge. When America had a vibrant middle class there was moderation in both parties as both appealed to the middle class for survival. Since Reaganomics destroyed the middle class combined with changing comparative economics in world trade, the American middle class is inconsequential.
Now conservatives have become reactionary and liberals have become radicals and the moderate middle of both parties has been marginalized as not being a real republican or a real democrat. Donald Trump represents the fantasy of greatness and bringing back Mayberry which appeals to the frustrated and scared Americans, and Bernie represents the fantasy of equality bringing back post WWII prosperity with strong unions and fair wages for Americans.
The reality is that this dichotomy is not healthy but hardly weird. It really was the exact same story in the 2012 election with Romney the silver spooned against the little guys candidate President Obama. If anyone thinks either one of these candidates cannot win the election, they are wrong.
No, this election is fully predictable and the same election as the last one ONLY in your mind. Every other witness to it in America, including ALL of the professional politic commentators, ALL of the politicians, and everyone else is saying "man, this election is so unpredictable and so weird".
It's like when you were the ONLY person in the entire country who was convinced George Zimmerman was found guilty of manslaughter in that trial because of some weird twisted logic you used that no one else comprehends, including legal professionals. lol
And, no, Romney and Trump aren't the same fucking thing. Romney never proposed to raise taxes on Wall Street types (like himself) and all other multi-millionaires. Trump has done that and done it bluntly.
And you totally misread what Trump's real appeal is because it's not that or illegal immigration or being "out-negotiated" by China or any other issue Trump has raised.
To explain Trump's actual appeal to the electorate, I only have to refer to Frank Luntz.
When someone is talking, the Luntz graph is moving up and down on every fucking word. And Luntz, and Hannity or O'Reilly or whoever else is gushing over Luntz and his graph, are all obsessing on that.
That is a metaphor now for our whole political system. When you judge a person by having people watch them with buttons in their hands, and the people are pushing the buttons to respond to every word, it's very similiar to animals pushing buttons to receive food.
Every single fucking word now has to be evaluated. And if one word is out of place, those button pushers are moving the graph and the television audience is all wired into that.
THAT is the definition of "correctness", political or otherwise. We used to apply the term "litmus test" to a candidate's whole persona or whole worldview or his take on a given issue. Now in the Luntz era, we're applying a fucking litmus test to every word he or she utters.
And Trump is the first individual to come along and challenge that in a big way.
That's his appeal.