Another unarmed black kid gunned down........so racism is not an issue in America

boards of FL wrote:Why is it so difficult for a GOP supporter to simply answer a question?  

Just when you think the dumbing down has bottomed out...

Markle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:Why is it so difficult for a GOP supporter to simply answer a question?  

Just when you think the dumbing down has bottomed out...

You think it's funny making fun of a tragedy?

That answer's your question.

2seaoat wrote:Keep in mind Seaoat.....the eyewitness was involved in the robbery.


There are three independent witnesses to the murder.  The prior act, the initial contact and shot at the police car are all irrelevant under the law.   The question is did the officer have a justifiable reason to shoot a citizen in the back and then continue to put bullets into him after he had raised his hands.  This is simple murder.  He should be indicted.  This is a smoke screen to buy time.   This will go to trial.   There will be charges this officer will face.  Justice will prevail and a trial will happen.   However, the smoke screens and slight of hand will not change the independent witness accounts.  All of which have not been officially taken as they cleverly try to write the officer back story.  Seen this too many times in person to find any deviation from what is happening every day across this country.

no stress wrote:Seaoat remains intentionally clueless because it fits the agenda. Any fact that doesnt fall in line with his reasoning (lol) is merely cause to stick his fingers in his ears and yell la la la la.  Same goes for a few others here.  

no stress wrote:Seaoat should also be reminded that eyewitness testimony has been proven over and over again to be among the leadt reliable.  Add in the fact that his eyewitness testimony comes from an obviously biased party and he has zilch.  Oh, gotta love the press release this morning where Crump states one thing then the families hired medical examiner states the exact opposite.   It gets no better than that folks. Lmfao!

othershoe1030 wrote:

no stress wrote:Seaoat remains intentionally clueless because it fits the agenda. Any fact that doesnt fall in line with his reasoning (lol) is merely cause to stick his fingers in his ears and yell la la la la.  Same goes for a few others here.  

I have been following this story pretty closely and am not aware of any eye witnesses reporting that he'd been shot from the back, with the possible exception of the first shot to hit him. Everything I've heard said he was leaving the area of the police car. Then there was a shot. The guy with him and others have said that his body jerked and he turned to face the police and raised his hands.
In the press conference this morning with the medical examiner from NYC the examiner stated that the wound at the top of his head exited above the right eyebrow and that they recovered three bullets from the body during the first autopsy.

That head wound showed that the gun was above the level of the victim's head. Brown was well over 6 ft. tall so had to be kneeling or at least leaning forward, like bowing in order for the top of his head to be presented in that way to the gun.

He also said that the victim could have been in several different positions at the time he was shot at that point and that more information would be needed to determine the victim's position.

At any rate it is way too soon to be chuckling over something that hasn't been proven yet.

othershoe1030 wrote:

no stress wrote:Seaoat remains intentionally clueless because it fits the agenda. Any fact that doesnt fall in line with his reasoning (lol) is merely cause to stick his fingers in his ears and yell la la la la.  Same goes for a few others here.  

I have been following this story pretty closely and am not aware of any eye witnesses reporting that he'd been shot from the back, with the possible exception of the first shot to hit him. Everything I've heard said he was leaving the area of the police car. Then there was a shot. The guy with him and others have said that his body jerked and he turned to face the police and raised his hands.
In the press conference this morning with the medical examiner from NYC the examiner stated that the wound at the top of his head exited above the right eyebrow and that they recovered three bullets from the body during the first autopsy.

That head wound showed that the gun was above the level of the victim's head. Brown was well over 6 ft. tall so had to be kneeling or at least leaning forward, like bowing in order for the top of his head to be presented in that way to the gun.

He also said that the victim could have been in several different positions at the time he was shot at that point and that more information would be needed to determine the victim's position.

At any rate it is way too soon to be chuckling over something that hasn't been proven yet.

no stress wrote:Rhetorical?   Meh, I'll bite anyway.  You're biased, seaoat is biased, we are all biased.  Does that help?

2seaoat wrote:Rhetorical? Meh, I'll bite anyway. You're biased, seaoat is biased, we are all biased. Does that help?


Yes, I am biased.  When an unarmed kid gets murdered by an officer of the law, I tend to want justice.  It is a terrible predisposition I have.  Fortunately, I can come here and have some of our best Mensa candidates explain why an indictment and a trial would not be justice......I love this place.

boards of FL wrote:

no stress wrote:Rhetorical?   Meh, I'll bite anyway.  You're biased, seaoat is biased, we are all biased.  Does that help?

That actually wasn't rhetorical.   Are you saying all of the eye witnesses are biased?  

I promise this isn't a trick question.

Joanimaroni wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

no stress wrote:Rhetorical?   Meh, I'll bite anyway.  You're biased, seaoat is biased, we are all biased.  Does that help?

That actually wasn't rhetorical.   Are you saying all of the eye witnesses are biased?  

I promise this isn't a trick question.

Not biased.....just dishonest.


http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2014/08/18/expert-autopsy-reveals-eyewitness-accounts-that-brown-was-shot-in-back-are-false/


Baden also stated Brown was as close as 3 feet from the gun. Wasn't it stated Brown was 35' from the cop?

Oops! Now we will have to wait on Holders autopsy.....autopsy # 3.

2seaoat wrote:Rhetorical? Meh, I'll bite anyway. You're biased, seaoat is biased, we are all biased. Does that help?


Yes, I am biased. When an unarmed kid gets murdered by an officer of the law , I tend to want justice.  It is a terrible predisposition I have.  Fortunately, I can come here and have some of our best Mensa candidates explain why an indictment and a trial would not be justice......I love this place.

2seaoat wrote:Ferguson is about 70 percent black. Ferguson's mayor is white, as are five of six city council members and 50 of its 53 police officers. Many in Ferguson and beyond fear that local officials will not act fairly in determining whether to charge the officer, Darren Wilson, with a crime.

St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Bob McCulloch, who is in charge of the investigation, also is white. He comes from a family of police officers, including his father. When he was 12, his father was fatally shot by a black man while responding to a call. In a 2000 case, McCulloch brought no charges against two officers who fired 21 shots into a vehicle, killing two black men during an attempted drug arrest.
http://news.msn.com/us/strong-doj-response-to-ferguson-seeks-truth-calm

I finally got my suspicions confirmed.   context.

Markle wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Rhetorical? Meh, I'll bite anyway. You're biased, seaoat is biased, we are all biased. Does that help?


Yes, I am biased. When an unarmed kid gets murdered by an officer of the law , I tend to want justice.  It is a terrible predisposition I have.  Fortunately, I can come here and have some of our best Mensa candidates explain why an indictment and a trial would not be justice......I love this place.

You have no more of a basis for a murder arrest than you do that the Chicago Cubs will win the next World Series.

Sadly, and I mean that sincerely, you apparently you have a finite future with us and wish to stir as much s*** as possible before departing.  It is impossible for you to be reasonable, that would not be nearly as much fun.