Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Politifact's Lie of the Year: And the winner is...Mitt Romney for his "Jeeps made in China" comment

+3
Nekochan
othershoe1030
boards of FL
7 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 4]

Guest


Guest

Nekochan wrote:
W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:
W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:You guys should share this with the Jeep execs, as they are apparently in the dark along with Politifact.

It's straight from Bloomberg so take it up with them. From what this Bloomberg article says, Romney was not lying.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

That really isn't an option, is it you sad little vacuous sore loser...?

All we can do on this forum is take it up with the moron who tries to place it in the area of truth and posts it as de facto carved in stone dogma.

^^^^
Internet bully above....

Oh no..we have a stalker!!! Shocked

>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Yep. The pacepup declared that he is gonna stalk me around the forum and make that same silly post following my posts. That sounds like textbook cyber stalking, right guttersnipe...?

Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Oh boy. Now the idiot is gonna go all passive aggressive with her clownish sad faced emitiCONs.

You really showed me this time, didn't you...?

Keep it up. I'm still curious about your court experience.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

http://soonerblue2.wordpress.com/2012/10/04/romney-comes-out-swingin-and-lyin/

(from 10/4:)

Those aren’t roosters you hear crowing this morning, it’s Republicans celebrating that Romney didn’t fall off the stage at last night’s debate .. that all the pundits seem to think he held his own because he came out swinging.

Yes, Romney did as well as he could .. but I predict, just not good enough.

Of course the press loved it, though President Obama didn’t give them the drama they wanted .. and Mitt might get a small bump in the polls .. but in the cold light of day, his aggressiveness will not win him the election. His flip-flopping will get him in the end .. people still want a leader they can trust.

This latest chameleon act had him suddenly going liberal, after 18 months of going Teavangelical conservative, he abandoned the principles he endorsed to win the primary .. denied all of his unpopular policies.

I think he tried this same debate tactic against Ted Kennedy … trying to out-liberal the liberal.

All those people Romney trashed in the secret video for not paying enough taxes – now he’s telling those same working class voters that he absolutely, positively, good gracious, heavens to Betsy, will NOT cut taxes for the rich.

Yessiree, Romney’s got game when it comes to blatant, straight-up bullshitting .. he’s had a lot of practice.
How do conservatives support a man who gets up in front of 60 million people and denies every conservative pledge he’s made over the last few years?

Why would any independent voter believe Romney’s blatant lies about the massive tax cuts at the core of his economic plan .. or the shameless lie about his policy re pre-existing conditions and health insurance access? He basically said he’s going to replace Obamacare with Obamacare.

I don’t know why Obama didn’t bring up Romney’s “60 Minutes” comments about free emergency room healthcare for all.

Just a few weeks ago conservatives were applauding Mitt’s “more taxes on the 47%!” .. now he’s trying desperately to flip this by pretending that he will do the exact opposite .. he has reached the point of complete incoherence.

It reminds me of what Teddy K said in one of his Romney debates — “I’m pro-choice, and my opponent is multiple choice.”

I don’t know if it was the enthusiasm and confidence of the blatant lies that Romney opened with that sort of threw Obama off guard slightly for the first half of the debate .. but I thought Obama could’ve been more aggressive on the attack .. maybe with his strong lead in the polls, he thought it better to play it safe.

And how do you debate someone who is lying? Call them a liar?

Obama now has a clear go-ahead signal to be more aggressive in the final debates where it will matter even more .. and he did get Mitt to talk and talk and talk and give lots of sound bites that can be used in today’s ads .. Mitt from the debate vs. Mitt from a week ago, a month ago or …

Mitt’s contradicting himself and refusing to give details leaves 5 weeks for the public, the media, his base, etc. to question him on what exactly his policies are.

And he dumped all of his unpopular policies onto Paul Ryan, pretty much setting him up for Joe Biden next week.

In the end, it doesn’t matter whether you believe Mitt’s lies, or even if Republicans believe them. The only important issue here is whether those independent voters in OH, VA and FL, who’ve heard his 47% speech again and again and again, will think of these debate lies.

This is still an ideological election, an ideological choice, on both sides .. not just one side.
----------------------------------

ROMNESIA.

Nekochan

Nekochan

W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:
W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:You guys should share this with the Jeep execs, as they are apparently in the dark along with Politifact.

It's straight from Bloomberg so take it up with them. From what this Bloomberg article says, Romney was not lying.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

That really isn't an option, is it you sad little vacuous sore loser...?

All we can do on this forum is take it up with the moron who tries to place it in the area of truth and posts it as de facto carved in stone dogma.

^^^^
Internet bully above....

Oh no..we have a stalker!!! Shocked

>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Yep. The pacepup declared that he is gonna stalk me around the forum and make that same silly post following my posts. That sounds like textbook cyber stalking, right guttersnipe...?

Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Oh boy. Now the idiot is gonna go all passive aggressive with her clownish sad faced emitiCONs.

You really showed me this time, didn't you...?

Keep it up. I'm still curious about your court experience.

Your lawyers haven't served me those papers yet...after 4+ years, I'm still waiting. Suspect

Guest


Guest

Neko babbling:

Your lawyers haven't served me those papers yet...after 4+ years, I'm still waiting. Suspect [/quote]



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

LOL. I'm not talking about a lawsuit, moron. You know damned well what I'm referencing, and it wasn't pretty.

Nekochan

Nekochan

W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:
W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
boards of FL wrote:You guys should share this with the Jeep execs, as they are apparently in the dark along with Politifact.

It's straight from Bloomberg so take it up with them. From what this Bloomberg article says, Romney was not lying.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

That really isn't an option, is it you sad little vacuous sore loser...?

All we can do on this forum is take it up with the moron who tries to place it in the area of truth and posts it as de facto carved in stone dogma.

^^^^
Internet bully above....

Oh no..we have a stalker!!! Shocked

>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Yep. The pacepup declared that he is gonna stalk me around the forum and make that same silly post following my posts. That sounds like textbook cyber stalking, right guttersnipe...?

Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Oh boy. Now the idiot is gonna go all passive aggressive with her clownish sad faced emitiCONs.

You really showed me this time, didn't you...?

Keep it up. I'm still curious about your court experience.

Your lawyers haven't served me those papers yet...after 4+ years, I'm still waiting. Suspect


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

LOL. I'm not talking about a lawsuit, moron. You know damned well what I'm referencing, and it wasn't pretty.

Are you stalking me again?
Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad

Guest


Guest

Neko's passive aggressive stoopid question....

Are you stalking me again?
Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad [/quote]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You'd like that, wouldn't you.....? Then you could whine and tell even more lies....like now.

I guess you conveniently overlook the fact that I haven't been responding to you for a while, so now you want to fight with me again....that cover it...?

It's been that way for years. The fact that you are incorrigible is universally accepted.


Are you still screwing your neighbor's husband....?

Nekochan

Nekochan

You haven't been responding to ME?

Now, that's just too funny since you routinely follow me around, making nasty comments while referencing imaginary court proceedings that you claim I'm involved in.


Tell you what--you just go ahead and keep on not responding to me. Rolling Eyes

Guest


Guest

Nekochan wrote:You haven't been responding to ME?

Now, that's just too funny since you routinely follow me around, making nasty comments while referencing imaginary court proceedings that you claim I'm involved in.


Tell you what--you just go ahead and keep on not responding to me. Rolling Eyes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Now you're just BOLD -FACED lying.

Want me to prove it....?



Tell you what, how about YOU start ignoring me. That would be cool, and you could finally prove that you are a better MAN than me.

Nekochan

Nekochan

W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:You haven't been responding to ME?

Now, that's just too funny since you routinely follow me around, making nasty comments while referencing imaginary court proceedings that you claim I'm involved in.


Tell you what--you just go ahead and keep on not responding to me. Rolling Eyes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Now you're just BOLD -FACED lying.

Want me to prove it....?



Tell you what, how about YOU start ignoring me. That would be cool, and you could finally prove that you are a better MAN than me.

Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad

Margin Call

Margin Call

Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?


Who has a bigger reading comprehension problem, you or Romney?

From the Bloomberg article:

"Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China."

Nekochan

Nekochan

Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?


Who has a bigger reading comprehension problem, you or Romney?

From the Bloomberg article:

"Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China."

Did you read the first two sentences? Who has a comprehension problem?
plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country

boards of FL

boards of FL

Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?

Politifact is not wrong. The CEO of Fiat has even clarified this. Perhaps we should redirect here.

Nekochan, do you believe the CEO when he says "I feel obliged to unambiguously restate our position: Jeep production will not be moved from the United States to China,"? Doesn't that remove any doubt as to the legitimacy of the claim that Romney touted?


_________________
I approve this message.

Margin Call

Margin Call

Nekochan wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?


Who has a bigger reading comprehension problem, you or Romney?

From the Bloomberg article:

"Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China."

Did you read the first two sentences? Who has a comprehension problem?
plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country

The article was very clear about expanding production for cars sold in China. I encourage you to read the entire article.

Nekochan

Nekochan

boards of FL wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?

Politifact is not wrong. The CEO of Fiat has even clarified this. Perhaps we should redirect here.

Nekochan, do you believe the CEO when he says "I feel obliged to unambiguously restate our position: Jeep production will not be moved from the United States to China,"? Doesn't that remove any doubt as to the legitimacy of the claim that Romney touted?

I believe that when Bloomberg reports that the head of Jeep AND the manufacturer in China both said that Jeep might be moved to China and then the CEO says something differently--that Jeep has a problem in their communications department.

Do you always believe everything that every CEO says?

Nekochan

Nekochan

Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?


Who has a bigger reading comprehension problem, you or Romney?

From the Bloomberg article:

"Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China."

Did you read the first two sentences? Who has a comprehension problem?
plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country

The article was very clear about expanding production for cars sold in China. I encourage you to read the entire article.

I did read the entire article. Did you read the first two lines? I encourage you to do so. In journalism, the main facts are supposed to be put in the first couple of lines. Maybe Bloomberg got it wrong, maybe the Head of Jeep got it wrong. But there is a problem with communications from and about Jeep.

Margin Call

Margin Call

Nekochan wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?


Who has a bigger reading comprehension problem, you or Romney?

From the Bloomberg article:

"Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China."

Did you read the first two sentences? Who has a comprehension problem?
plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country

The article was very clear about expanding production for cars sold in China. I encourage you to read the entire article.

I did read the entire article. Did you read the first two lines? I encourage you to do so. In journalism, the main facts are supposed to be put in the first couple of lines. Maybe Bloomberg got it wrong, maybe the Head of Jeep got it wrong. But there is a problem with communications from and about Jeep.

So, your logic is that the sentence "Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China." is completely irrelevant to the story? That is your contention, right? Any clarifications beyond the first two lines have no meaning to the message being communicated, right?

Sorry my response was more than two lines long....probably a waste since you stopped reading a few lines back.

Nekochan

Nekochan

Well, the stalker has now resorted to stalking me and threatening me by private message.

WTM, I have nothing to say to you in private that I won't say right here:

If you send me any more pms, I will post them right on this forum. You cannot control me with your sad, pathetic threats.

boards of FL

boards of FL

Nekochan wrote:I did read the entire article. Did you read the first two lines? I encourage you to do so. In journalism, the main facts are supposed to be put in the first couple of lines. Maybe Bloomberg got it wrong, maybe the Head of Jeep got it wrong. But there is a problem with communications from and about Jeep.

The article is referring to the idea of building Jeeps in China that will ultimately be sold locally in China - as in, entering the market of China. This fact was twisted and reinterpreted as "OMG!!11 JEEP IS MOVING ITS US PRODUCTION TO CHINA!!!11" The CEO of the company in question then came out and said, no, that is not the case in the quote that I have already given you twice. He clarified their intent in a way that left absolutely no doubt. In the face of that unambiguous clarification, Romney doubled down on "OMG!!11 JEEP IS MOVING ITS US PRODUCTION TO CHINA!!111"

What's sad is that Romney knows this is completely full of shit. He was simply trying to fool those that are....less than literate. Romney and the rest of the world has since moved on. He has received his Lie of the Year award. Oddly enough, there are still people out there that are clinging to the idea that Jeep is in fact moving its US production to China.

There is no problem in communication. There is a problem in reading and comprehension.


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

Margin Call wrote:Sorry my response was more than two lines long....probably a waste since you stopped reading a few lines back.

Oddly enough, Nekochan is likely a christian who subscribes to the new testament, but not the old!


_________________
I approve this message.

Nekochan

Nekochan

Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Boards...

The first two lines of Politifact:

It was a lie told in the critical state of Ohio in the final days of a close campaign -- that Jeep was moving its U.S. production to China. It originated with a conservative blogger, who twisted an accurate news story into a falsehood.

The first two lines of the Bloomberg report:

Fiat SpA (F), majority owner of Chrysler Group LLC, plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country, according to the head of both automakers’ operations in the region.
Fiat is in “very detailed conversations” with its Chinese partner, Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (2238), about making Jeeps in the world’s largest auto market, said Mike Manley, chief operating officer of Fiat and Chrysler in Asia.

.......................

Politifact was blatantly wrong in their first two lines, claiming that a true story was twisted. Yet, we're supposed to believe everything else in this "factcheck" that they claim? What is that called?
Do you turn to Fox News when you want accurate and fair reporting? If not, then why?


Who has a bigger reading comprehension problem, you or Romney?

From the Bloomberg article:

"Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China."

Did you read the first two sentences? Who has a comprehension problem?
plans to return Jeep output to China and may eventually make all of its models in that country

The article was very clear about expanding production for cars sold in China. I encourage you to read the entire article.

I did read the entire article. Did you read the first two lines? I encourage you to do so. In journalism, the main facts are supposed to be put in the first couple of lines. Maybe Bloomberg got it wrong, maybe the Head of Jeep got it wrong. But there is a problem with communications from and about Jeep.

So, your logic is that the sentence "Manley referred to adding Jeep production sites rather than shifting output from North America to China." is completely irrelevant to the story? That is your contention, right? Any clarifications beyond the first two lines have no meaning to the message being communicated, right?

Sorry my response was more than two lines long....probably a waste since you stopped reading a few lines back.

LOL, you're funny. I didn't say that anything in the story is irrelevant. I said that the main point in a news story is written in the first couple of lines.

I think the Bloomberg piece was poorly written. The first two lines made it appear as though Jeep might move all of its Jeep production to China. It could very easily be interpreted that way. BUT I don't think that's what Jeep meant to be reported and I really don't think that is or was Jeep's intent. But to read the story and say that Romney is a liar for what he said is a very far stretch. Politifact is simply biased. Liberals rant all the time about Fox News and other news organizations being biased, but then they believe everything a group like Politifact says. There were many exaggerations on BOTH sides and maybe some outright lies. But this story, based on what Bloomberg actually reported, I do not believe was the biggest lie of the campaign.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
Nekochan wrote:I did read the entire article. Did you read the first two lines? I encourage you to do so. In journalism, the main facts are supposed to be put in the first couple of lines. Maybe Bloomberg got it wrong, maybe the Head of Jeep got it wrong. But there is a problem with communications from and about Jeep.

The article is referring to the idea of building Jeeps in China that will ultimately be sold locally in China - as in, entering the market of China. This fact was twisted and reinterpreted as "OMG!!11 JEEP IS MOVING ITS US PRODUCTION TO CHINA!!!11" The CEO of the company in question then came out and said, no, that is not the case in the quote that I have already given you twice. He clarified their intent in a way that left absolutely no doubt. In the face of that unambiguous clarification, Romney doubled down on "OMG!!11 JEEP IS MOVING ITS US PRODUCTION TO CHINA!!111"

What's sad is that Romney knows this is completely full of shit. He was simply trying to fool those that are....less than literate. Romney and the rest of the world has since moved on. He has received his Lie of the Year award. Oddly enough, there are still people out there that are clinging to the idea that Jeep is in fact moving its US production to China.

There is no problem in communication. There is a problem in reading and comprehension.

Then why start this stupid ass thread. Apparently people have not moved on because people are still starting threads about Romney.

HELLO ROMNEY LOST THE ELECTION IS OVER.

Nekochan

Nekochan

boards of FL wrote:
Margin Call wrote:Sorry my response was more than two lines long....probably a waste since you stopped reading a few lines back.

Oddly enough, Nekochan is likely a christian who subscribes to the new testament, but not the old!

Ahh....now you bring religion into it. Why?

Nekochan

Nekochan

alecto wrote:
boards of FL wrote:
Nekochan wrote:I did read the entire article. Did you read the first two lines? I encourage you to do so. In journalism, the main facts are supposed to be put in the first couple of lines. Maybe Bloomberg got it wrong, maybe the Head of Jeep got it wrong. But there is a problem with communications from and about Jeep.

The article is referring to the idea of building Jeeps in China that will ultimately be sold locally in China - as in, entering the market of China. This fact was twisted and reinterpreted as "OMG!!11 JEEP IS MOVING ITS US PRODUCTION TO CHINA!!!11" The CEO of the company in question then came out and said, no, that is not the case in the quote that I have already given you twice. He clarified their intent in a way that left absolutely no doubt. In the face of that unambiguous clarification, Romney doubled down on "OMG!!11 JEEP IS MOVING ITS US PRODUCTION TO CHINA!!111"

What's sad is that Romney knows this is completely full of shit. He was simply trying to fool those that are....less than literate. Romney and the rest of the world has since moved on. He has received his Lie of the Year award. Oddly enough, there are still people out there that are clinging to the idea that Jeep is in fact moving its US production to China.

There is no problem in communication. There is a problem in reading and comprehension.

Then why start this stupid ass thread. Apparently people have not moved on because people are still starting threads about Romney.

HELLO ROMNEY LOST THE ELECTION IS OVER.

Wink

Guest


Guest

Nekochan wrote:Well, the stalker has now resorted to stalking me and threatening me by private message.

WTM, I have nothing to say to you in private that I won't say right here:

If you send me any more pms, I will post them right on this forum. You cannot control me with your sad, pathetic threats.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Your passive aggressive BS has zero boundaries. You're not gonna PM me and you want everyone to know it, bless your tiny little black heart. So all you did was create even more dissent hoping the forum folk will hang on every word...."I wonder what he said to her...?"

You sure can spin everything like a top on steroids.


Do you want ME to post what I sent you in a PM right here on the open forums...?

That's a rhetorical question, so don't bother responding. And don't EVER refer to me as "the stalker" again.

I see the PM, like most things, plumb evaded you. Trust me, there will never be another PM from me....there's no reason, and you responded exactly like I expected by attacking me, again.

You are dead freaking deadski to me, and you had best make it reciprocal.



Nekochan

Nekochan

W_T_M wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Well, the stalker has now resorted to stalking me and threatening me by private message.

WTM, I have nothing to say to you in private that I won't say right here:

If you send me any more pms, I will post them right on this forum. You cannot control me with your sad, pathetic threats.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Your passive aggressive BS has zero boundaries. You're not gonna PM me and you want everyone to know it, bless your tiny little black heart. So all you did was create even more dissent hoping the forum folk will hang on every word...."I wonder what he said to her...?"

You sure can spin everything like a top on steroids.


Do you want ME to post what I sent you in a PM right here on the open forums...?

That's a rhetorical question, so don't bother responding. And don't EVER refer to me as "the stalker" again.

I see the PM, like most things, plumb evaded you. Trust me, there will never be another PM from me....there's no reason, and you responded exactly like I expected by attacking me, again.

You are dead freaking deadski to me, and you had best make it reciprocal.




Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 4]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum