You a republican? Justify Alabama's gov saying she thinks Moore is a pedophile but will STILL vote for him.

Floridatexan wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.

Too bad you don't know the difference.  I'm tired of the attacks on Bill Clinton.



I still admire Bill Clinton, and I don't believe the smears against him.  

PkrBum wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.

Too bad you don't know the difference.  I'm tired of the attacks on Bill Clinton.



I still admire Bill Clinton, and I don't believe the smears against him.  

See? For the record again... I don't care who or what brings a politician down. If they are corrupt or deviant I want them hung... period. What I can't participate in is a strictly partisan witch hunt. There are remedies and due process for offenders. I think Moore did it... I'm not sure... but that's what the courts are for. The difference... and the root of the rot... is knowing for sure and still excusing it. A la bill. That changes everything and no one should be surprised by this result. One set of rules and standards. Are accusations enough? In every circumstance? What happens if there is a concession to accusations? What then (like bill)? I just wish that you useful idiots would set some firm parameters.

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.

Too bad you don't know the difference.  I'm tired of the attacks on Bill Clinton.



I still admire Bill Clinton, and I don't believe the smears against him.  

See? For the record again... I don't care who or what brings a politician down. If they are corrupt or deviant I want them hung... period. What I can't participate in is a strictly partisan witch hunt. There are remedies and due process for offenders. I think Moore did it... I'm not sure... but that's what the courts are for. The difference... and the root of the rot... is knowing for sure and still excusing it. A la bill. That changes everything and no one should be surprised by this result. One set of rules and standards. Are accusations enough? In every circumstance? What happens if there is a concession to accusations? What then (like bill)? I just wish that you useful idiots would set some firm parameters.

"A strictly partisan witch hunt?  The thread is about Roy Moore.  It would seem he has as many republicans in congress who can't stand him, as there are democrats.  Even those who insist on voting for him are willing to do so even if he's guilty of what he's been accused.

Pkrbum, do try to focus kiddo.  Do you really think it's only democrats who detest this scumbag?

Wordslinger wrote:Pkrbum, do try to focus kiddo.  

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.

Too bad you don't know the difference.  I'm tired of the attacks on Bill Clinton.



I still admire Bill Clinton, and I don't believe the smears against him.  

See? For the record again... I don't care who or what brings a politician down. If they are corrupt or deviant I want them hung... period. What I can't participate in is a strictly partisan witch hunt. There are remedies and due process for offenders. I think Moore did it... I'm not sure... but that's what the courts are for. The difference... and the root of the rot... is knowing for sure and still excusing it. A la bill. That changes everything and no one should be surprised by this result. One set of rules and standards. Are accusations enough? In every circumstance? What happens if there is a concession to accusations? What then (like bill)? I just wish that you useful idiots would set some firm parameters.

"A strictly partisan witch hunt?  The thread is about Roy Moore.  It would seem he has as many republicans in congress who can't stand him, as there are democrats.  Even those who insist on voting for him are willing to do so even if he's guilty of what he's been accused.

Pkrbum, do try to focus kiddo.  Do you really think it's only democrats who detest this scumbag?

Fine... I'll act strictly on my instincts. He's a fucking perv. He used his status (power) to deviant means.

Remind you... I don't know that for a fact like we do (did) that Bill took advantage of a young intern.

What happened then? Was he run out of office by public condemnation? By feminists?

Y'all are a bunch of phonies. Your morals only extend as far as your partisan micro dicks.