Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » You a republican? Justify Alabama's gov saying she thinks Moore is a pedophile but will STILL vote for him.

You a republican? Justify Alabama's gov saying she thinks Moore is a pedophile but will STILL vote for him.

+3
Telstar
zsomething
Wordslinger
7 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

After Nixon I always suspected that all those self-righteous, white Christian moralists really didn't care about those values at all, they just liked to insult groups they hated. Look how they hate gays, blacks, Mexicans, women, the poor and the elderly. And finally, I have absolute proof my suspicions are valid. Welcome to today's republicans -- Whatever crimes a republican has committed, against minorities, women, children, whatever, their deplorable record of morals and integrity don't matter anymore. No sir. If you're on a republican ticket and you've raped little children, or robbed old folks, or whatever .... WHATEVER ... your republican brethren are gonna vote for you anyway 'cause ain't nothin' matters 'cept party and power!

Read the following, and if you're a republican conservative, defend the new sans-morals stance of your brethren. Tell us why the only political thing of any importance to republicans is electing another republican no matter what they've done to others. Justify to us why truth, justice, and morality no longer matter to you and your party!

And please don't seek refuge in pointing out the crimes of Clinton (he or she) or Al Franken, or other moral-less creepy politicians.

Read what the governor of Alabama has to say about this issue ...

"• AL-Sen: The shocking pedophilia revelations regarding Republican nominee Roy Moore in the upcoming Senate special election have drawn astonishing condemnation from top national Republicans. However, major state Republicans have yet to desert their reprehensible nominee, and we can count GOP Gov. Kay Ivey among them when she said the following on Friday:

"I'm going to cast my ballot on December the 12th, and I do believe the nominee of the party is the one I'll vote for," Ivey said. "I believe in the Republican Party, what we stand for, and most important, we need to have a Republican in the United States Senate to vote on things like the Supreme Court justices, other appointments the Senate has to confirm and make major decisions. So that's what I plan to do, vote for Republican nominee Roy Moore."

[...]

She was asked if she believed Moore's accusers.

"I certainly have no reason to disbelieve any of them," Ivey said. "The timing is a little curious. But at the same time, I have no reason to disbelieve them."

It represents breathtaking moral bankruptcy for Ivey to back a candidate whom she admits she believes is a pedophile simply because they'll further her party's quest for power, but this is the same sort of partisanship-over-everything attitude that put Donald Trump in the White House. However, a critical number of typical GOP voters may not share her stance, unlike in last year’s presidential race.

Guest


Guest

See: Bill Clinton

zsomething



It's a cult now. The Republicans courted the religious, because they knew they were prone to believing things on faith and working around facts and logic to keep believing 'em. They exploited that and eventually replaced Jesus's teachings with Republican dogma. It's common now to see the Bible next to Atlas Shrugged on Republican bookshelves... even though Ayn Rand's philosophy was used as the basis for LaVeyan Satanism. They admit as much on the Church of Satan's website.

In the process, they've destroyed both their political party and much of the Christian religion. But, they have built a devoted cult. There's really not much other reason to support Trump and Moore but hardcore party brainwashing.

They've lost their way. Like I keep saying, dealing with them is like dealing with a Scientologist at this point. They believe a bunch of hogwash and they're married to it, no amount of talking sense or showing facts will shake them off of it. They'll elect a pedophile as long as he's a member of their cult. I don't know if the main thing driving them is love for the cult, or hatred for the cult's opposition, but whatever it is, it's 200 proof.

Telstar

Telstar

Child molesting doesn't run in republican families, it gallops.



You a republican? Justify Alabama's gov saying she thinks Moore is a pedophile but will STILL vote for him. Donald10

5You a republican? Justify Alabama's gov saying she thinks Moore is a pedophile but will STILL vote for him. Empty Only the best people... 11/20/2017, 12:56 pm

Guest


Guest

Ralph Shortey, a former Oklahoma State Senator (R) and Trump Campaign Coordinator pleads guilty to Child Sex Trafficking and faces up to life in prison.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-cam...222545006.html

in March he surrendered on charges of engaging in child prostitution, transporting a minor for prostitution, and engaging in prostitution within 1,000 feet of a church. The charges came after the police found Shortey in a Super-8 Motel in Moore, OK with a 17-year old boy. Shortey was later charged in Federal Court with two counts of child pornography, production of child pornography, and child sex trafficking.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate. And what's your point? That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser? "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

2seaoat



You have to have a two way player like Green to be NBA champs. There have been exceptions, but defense wins championships. That is what has been so impressive for me is the growing defensive prowess of Curry and Durant. Klay and Green are both renowned for their defense, but when you get four starters playing at that level......there will be more rings.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

2seaoat wrote:You have to have a two way player like Green to be NBA champs.  There have been exceptions, but defense wins championships.   That is what has been so impressive for me is the growing defensive prowess of Curry and Durant.  Klay and Green are both renowned for their defense, but when you get four starters playing at that level......there will be more rings.

Did you mean for this comment to be in this thread?

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
2seaoat wrote:You have to have a two way player like Green to be NBA champs.  There have been exceptions, but defense wins championships.   That is what has been so impressive for me is the growing defensive prowess of Curry and Durant.  Klay and Green are both renowned for their defense, but when you get four starters playing at that level......there will be more rings.

Did you mean for this comment to be in this thread?

No... but I quoted it into the NBA thread for him.

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point? Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate. Are you among them?

Telstar

Telstar

Guest


Guest

And Trump supporters are insulted at the implication they may be deplorable. Those that support a child molesters are the very definition of deplorable.

Hillary was correct!

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.
\
Oh golly little boy, did we hit a soft spot? And whether I cheered Clinton's sex escapades or loathed them has nothing whatever to do with this thread. What's crystal clear is you're frantically disturbed by your favorite bunch of right wing conservative white Christian assholes tossing all their self-righteous moral superiority and good ole values right in the shitter if it comes to losing a senate seat. Of course, we liberals knew your high-handed so-called moral superiority was pure bullshit anyway and watching the President -- our leader of sexual abusers -- ask for Moore to be elected no matter what -- says it all. Face it asshole -- you'll never be able to hold your head up again. LOL!

Telstar

Telstar

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.
\
Oh golly little boy, did we hit a soft spot?  And whether I cheered Clinton's sex escapades or loathed them has nothing whatever to do with this thread.  What's crystal clear is you're frantically disturbed by your favorite bunch of right wing conservative white Christian assholes tossing all their self-righteous moral superiority and good ole values right in the shitter if it comes to losing a senate seat.  Of course, we liberals knew your high-handed so-called moral superiority was pure bullshit anyway and watching the President -- our leader of sexual abusers -- ask for Moore to be elected no matter what -- says it all.  Face it asshole -- you'll never be able to hold your head up again.   LOL!







The snowflakes are melting early. lol!

Guest


Guest

F-bombs?!!!

Almost as classy as Moore and the molester in chief.

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.
\
Oh golly little boy, did we hit a soft spot?  And whether I cheered Clinton's sex escapades or loathed them has nothing whatever to do with this thread.  What's crystal clear is you're frantically disturbed by your favorite bunch of right wing conservative white Christian assholes tossing all their self-righteous moral superiority and good ole values right in the shitter if it comes to losing a senate seat.  Of course, we liberals knew your high-handed so-called moral superiority was pure bullshit anyway and watching the President -- our leader of sexual abusers -- ask for Moore to be elected no matter what -- says it all.  Face it asshole -- you'll never be able to hold your head up again.   LOL!


Wrong... I have and still do want every corrupt/deviant politician hung. Nice strawman. Rolling Eyes

zsomething



Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.
\
Oh golly little boy, did we hit a soft spot?  And whether I cheered Clinton's sex escapades or loathed them has nothing whatever to do with this thread.  What's crystal clear is you're frantically disturbed by your favorite bunch of right wing conservative white Christian assholes tossing all their self-righteous moral superiority and good ole values right in the shitter if it comes to losing a senate seat.  Of course, we liberals knew your high-handed so-called moral superiority was pure bullshit anyway and watching the President -- our leader of sexual abusers -- ask for Moore to be elected no matter what -- says it all.  Face it asshole -- you'll never be able to hold your head up again.   LOL!


Nailed it. Smile

Pkr is, frankly, deranged. Anything that happens, he's going to try to find a way to blame the Clintons, because nothing can ever be the fault of the people he supports. So Trump's a sexual predator of a half-dozen different stripes, everything from admitted grabbing to bought-off child-rape, and Roy Moore's got a long-standing history of being a short-eyes, but none of that is their fault. Oh no, of course not... the real problem is that Bill Clinton was a sleaze 20 years ago.

Which he assuredly was, a sleaze-artist in the extreme, no argument... although, as I recall, he was president, not "God." In Pkr's mind he seems to be an all-powerful being who directs the universe, and, because he was skeevy, every man who comes after him is -- through some political Calvinism which is not for sane minds to ponder -- predestined to do horrible things to women, for which these men are to be rendered completely blameless (except for Al Franken because, y'know, liberals are immune from the forces of predestination). Clinton is the butterfly flapping his wings in Tibet and thus causing hurricanes in the Gulf.

When Pkr forgets to take out the trash, it's not his fault. He was but the helpless pawn of greater forces. The actual culprit is Bill Clinton (oooo, how I hate him), who once forgot to take out the trash back in Arkansas in 1987, thereby setting a precedent which has ever since guided the universe and led it off the path of righteousness.

Pkr, of course, holds all politicians accountable, for he is the most morally forthright of men. We only lose sight of this because, instead of agreeing with you when you try to blame the Republican ones, he doubts them, while bringing up something a Democrat did. This creates the appearance that he's really biased, but, he can't help that.

Because Bill Clinton did something like that once, back in 1994, when he blamed a fart on a dog, and that created a slipstream of wrong-assed-ness upon which Pkr -- blameless as a fallen leaf in a rushing stream -- got swept away. We are but mortals, all guided by the doings of Bill Clinton, Overlord of The Universe, the Allfather who sits on a distant mountain, working out the Riddle of Steel and caring not how his misdeeds warp the world of men. He goes by many names across the world, but... it's all Bill Clinton, the sneaky bastard.

Anyway, gotta go clean the catbox. Damn thing poops all the time. I think Bill Clinton is sneaking into my house at night and feeding it.

Guest


Guest

It's a stupid exercise to assign things to me that I've never stated... never supported.

Put away the clownshoes and make a real argument.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:It's a stupid exercise to assign things to me that I've never stated... never supported.

Put away the clownshoes and make a real argument.

The governor of Alabama already did. She says no matter what she's voting for Moore because he's a republican. Trump now says the same. And so does Kelly Ann Conway. So we have absolute confirmation from the President of the U.S., his witchy old blonde advisor and the Governor of Alabama that only getting Session's vacant senate seat filled by a republican -- regardless whether he's a criminal pedophile or not -- is all that counts.

The result, of course, is a blanket admission by these republican leaders and mouthpieces, that a republican candidate's criminal and moral record no longer accounts for anything. All that matters is that he gets elected.

Which, as I stated above, all of us liberals knew that the republican image of upholding Jesus, God, white Christian people, and heterosexuals, and anything or anyone they hate for any reason whatever, and all right wing family values etc., was all a sham.

That's a REAL argument booby. And one, it's obvious, you simply can't confront other than burbling what about the Clintons? LOL

C'mon little boy. Tell us why your whole party has abandoned morality, justice and the entire sex known as female. We're all ears.

While you're at it, tell us why any American woman should ever again support your party!

Please!

zsomething



PkrBum wrote:It's a stupid exercise to assign things to me that I've never stated... never supported.

Put away the clownshoes and make a real argument.

Your problem is that actions speak louder than words, and you're too dumb - or dishonest - to have a clue what your actions are saying and supporting. You can't buy away actions with words, because nobody's gonna believe what you say when everything you do is the opposite. Don't tell me what you are... show me what you do and I'll tell you what you are.

Every once in a while you say "I don't support Trump, I want him held accountable"... but anytime someone here says anything against him, your default response isn't agreement with 'em, or even entertaining the veracity of their argument. Instead, it's attacking them and defense of Trump (while still saying "I don't even like him,") and distraction by playing "whataboutism." You don't want to address the fact that Trump flat-out said he's a pussy-grabber, or that over a dozen women have accused him. You don't want to speak to the credibility of the charges Roy Moore is facing.

Nope. You want to blame Bill Clinton. You want to go back 20 years because that's more comfortable than what's happening now. I don't think many people dispute that Bill Clinton is a well-established sleaze, but that doesn't have anything to do with the actions of Trump or Roy Moore. it doesn't excuse them, it doesn't cause them... it, truthfully, has fuck-all to do with them. Nothing. Zip zilch zero nada. It's dumb to even bring it up, but then you get all colicky if I mock it.

Do you not goddamn see what you're actually saying here, with more than just words? You don't just get to say "I want everyone held accountable" when your response to accountability for any Republican is "fake news! And anyway, Bill Clinton!" You fucking lie. You lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.

Here's something philosophical to learn: Truth is behavior. Embrace that, because there's really no way around it. It's the core of all human interaction, because people's words lie but their actions don't. You can say "I love my dog" while you neglect and starve it, or you can say "I hate my dog" but feed and shelter it and take it to the vet when it's sick. It's not hard to see which is the real truth there. Truth is behavior, and it doesn't matter what you say when your actions NEVER match it. NEVER. Why the hell should anybody believe what you say about being egalitarian when your knee-jerk response is attack-anything-liberal, defend-anything-conservative. We're not blind, dude. You don't get to do that again and again, day after day, and then say, "Well, actually, I'm a moderate libertarian who wants everyone accountable," yadda-yadda-yadda.

You're willing to let anyone Republican get away with anything, while holding anyone Democratic accountable for the tinest infraction... even if you have to magnify 'em or flat-out make-shit-up. You disbelieve and explain away any charge against a Republican while believing every fast-and-furious/uranium-one debunked conspiracy against any Democrat. Which would be fine if you'd just own it and flat-out say, "Okay, I'm an InfoWars-believing biased Nazi-apologist Trump-supporting stooge." That'd at least be honest. But no, you wanna act like one of those, but expect to be treated like an open-minded moderate. Sorry, Charlie, it doesn't work that way. We have eyes. You get chances to build credibility but you fail them every damn time because you just have to try to "trigger the snowflakes" or whatever sillybusiness you think you're doing. You subject us to this junk and then you tell yourself you're a fair, upstanding guy who just wants the truth. Horrrrsssssseesheeeeeeeyiiiiit, budreaux, horseshiiiiit. Liar, liar, liar, liar, liar. Maybe you can lie to yourself about that noise, but I hate to tell ya, it's not working for anybody else.

You're not honest about where you actually stand, you can't accept that that's obvious to us and we see it, and you may not even be honest with yourself about it, but... look at what you fucking do, nimrod. Practice a little pattern recognition. Do a little self-assesment and you'll see that the pattern you create through behavior doesn't match the way you'd like to think of yourself, at all. I don't care what you say.

You don't deserve to be treated with anything but clownshoes. I'm not about to grant someone who acts like you any degree of seriousness and dignify your childish what-about "arguments" with anything but mockery. You get what you earn, and are pouting because you wanted something else. You're like some guy with a barn full of molotov cocktails saying, "If there's anything I hate, it's arsonists" and being surprised that's not enough to get you elected fire chief. Sorry, but I ain't buyin' the bullshit.



Wordslinger

Wordslinger

zsomething wrote:
PkrBum wrote:It's a stupid exercise to assign things to me that I've never stated... never supported.

Put away the clownshoes and make a real argument.

Your problem is that actions speak louder than words, and you're too dumb - or dishonest -  to have a clue what your actions are saying and supporting.  You can't buy away actions with words, because nobody's gonna believe what you say when everything you do is the opposite.  Don't tell me what you are... show me what you do and I'll tell you what you are.

Every once in a while you say "I don't support Trump, I want him held accountable"... but anytime someone here says anything against him, your default response isn't agreement with 'em, or even entertaining the veracity of their argument.   Instead, it's attacking them and defense of Trump (while still saying "I don't even like him,")  and distraction by playing "whataboutism."  You don't want to address the fact that Trump flat-out said he's a pussy-grabber, or that over a dozen women have accused him.  You don't want to speak to the credibility of the charges Roy Moore is facing.

Nope.  You want to blame Bill Clinton.  You want to go back 20 years because that's more comfortable than what's happening now.  I don't think many people dispute that Bill Clinton is a well-established sleaze, but that doesn't have anything to do with the actions of Trump or Roy Moore.  it doesn't excuse them, it doesn't cause them... it, truthfully, has fuck-all to do with them.  Nothing.  Zip zilch zero nada.  It's dumb to even bring it up, but then you get all colicky if I mock it.

Do you not goddamn see what you're actually saying here, with more than just words?   You don't just get to say "I want everyone held accountable" when your response to accountability for any Republican is "fake news!  And anyway, Bill Clinton!"  You fucking lie.  You lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.

Here's something philosophical to learn: Truth is behavior.  Embrace that, because there's really no way around it.  It's the core of all human interaction, because people's words lie but their actions don't.  You can say "I love my dog" while you neglect and starve it, or you can say "I hate my dog" but feed and shelter it and take it to the vet when it's sick.  It's not hard to see which is the real truth there.  Truth is behavior, and it doesn't matter what you say when your actions NEVER match it.  NEVER.  Why the hell should anybody believe what you say about being egalitarian when your knee-jerk response is attack-anything-liberal, defend-anything-conservative.  We're not blind, dude.   You don't get to do that again and again, day after day, and then say, "Well, actually, I'm a moderate libertarian who wants everyone accountable," yadda-yadda-yadda.

You're willing to let anyone Republican get away with anything, while holding anyone Democratic accountable for the tinest infraction... even if you have to magnify 'em or flat-out make-shit-up.  You disbelieve and explain away any charge against a Republican while believing every fast-and-furious/uranium-one debunked conspiracy against  any Democrat.   Which would be fine if you'd just own it and flat-out say, "Okay, I'm an InfoWars-believing biased Nazi-apologist Trump-supporting stooge."  That'd at least be honest.   But no, you wanna act like one of those, but expect to be treated like an open-minded moderate.  Sorry, Charlie, it doesn't work that way.  We have eyes.  You get chances to build credibility but you fail them every damn time because you just have to try to "trigger the snowflakes" or whatever sillybusiness you think you're doing.    You subject us to this junk and then you tell yourself you're a fair, upstanding guy who just wants the truth.  Horrrrsssssseesheeeeeeeyiiiiit, budreaux, horseshiiiiit.  Liar, liar, liar, liar, liar.  Maybe you can lie to yourself about that noise, but I hate to tell ya, it's not working for anybody else.

You're not honest about where you actually stand, you can't accept that that's obvious to us and we see it, and you may not even be honest with yourself about it, but... look at what you fucking do, nimrod.  Practice a little pattern recognition.  Do a little self-assesment and you'll see that the pattern you create through behavior doesn't match the way you'd like to think of yourself, at all.   I don't care what you say.

You don't deserve to be treated with anything but clownshoes.  I'm not about to grant someone who acts like you any degree of seriousness and dignify your childish what-about "arguments" with anything but mockery.  You get what you earn, and are pouting because you wanted something else.  You're like some guy with a barn full of molotov cocktails saying, "If there's anything I hate, it's arsonists" and being surprised that's not enough to get you elected fire chief.   Sorry, but I ain't buyin' the bullshit.  




Glad to see your post above. I agree!!!!!
cheers cheers cheers cheers cheers cheers

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:See: Bill Clinton

Clinton isn't running for senate.  And what's your point?  That it's okay for a pedophile who molested a 14-yr-old little girl because Clinton was a sexual abuser?  "Listen Mommy, Jimmy poisoned his dog to death, so why am I wrong?

Bill and the democrats set a precedent. It was "just sex" remember? He was/is a sexual predator.

so what's your point?  Nobody here is defending Clinton and
Clinton's actions have nothing whatever to do with the republicans being willing to elect a man most of them admit is a pedophile criminal, in order to save a seat in the Senate.  Are you among them?

I'll tell you the point.

You have no room to talk when you defended a sexual predictor in the white house.

Sooo... fuck you on your moral high horse now. This climate is the rot from you defending trash.

Btw... there's a difference between accusation, settling accusation, and admission/proof.

Too bad you don't know the difference.  I'm tired of the attacks on Bill Clinton.



I still admire Bill Clinton, and I don't believe the smears against him.

Deus X

Deus X

Floridatexan wrote:I still admire Bill Clinton, and I don't believe the smears against him.  

Why are they "smears" against Bill Clinton but not against Moore or Trump?

Clinton admitted the Lewinsky dalliance, is that a "smear"?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » You a republican? Justify Alabama's gov saying she thinks Moore is a pedophile but will STILL vote for him.

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum