Perfect.
This place is a morgue.
See ya.
This place is a morgue.
See ya.
Future of the forum
Markle wrote:Telstar wrote:I know this is probably a dumb question but how and why does Boards have the power to banish anyone? It seems to me that if Boards really does have the power to ban anyone it's very considerate of him to put it to a member vote. Why is it that the member in question does not just turn the tables and banish boards? If Boards has that power because he created, supports and maintains this group than good for Boards, he deserves it. On the other hand if someone is banned why moan and groan about it? They should simply create their own forum page and invite those that enjoy reading their spam/posts to contribute to it, complaining about being banned only points out how powerless and impotent the banee is. I know that I could never create and maintain a forum like this so Boards if you are the real power behind this forum I thank you publicly for providing and maintaining it and allowing me to be informed and heard.
Anyone can "create" and maintain a forum. They're boiler plate, you simply go to a website, fill out the information and off you go. BoardsofFL was lucky that his in Pensacola at the same time the Pensacola Newspaper folded their forum.
Here is the site from which BoardsofFL established "his" forum.
https://www.forumotion.com/
Salinsky wrote:Perfect.
This place is a morgue.
See ya.
Telstar wrote:Markle wrote:Telstar wrote:I know this is probably a dumb question but how and why does Boards have the power to banish anyone? It seems to me that if Boards really does have the power to ban anyone it's very considerate of him to put it to a member vote. Why is it that the member in question does not just turn the tables and banish boards? If Boards has that power because he created, supports and maintains this group than good for Boards, he deserves it. On the other hand if someone is banned why moan and groan about it? They should simply create their own forum page and invite those that enjoy reading their spam/posts to contribute to it, complaining about being banned only points out how powerless and impotent the banee is. I know that I could never create and maintain a forum like this so Boards if you are the real power behind this forum I thank you publicly for providing and maintaining it and allowing me to be informed and heard.
Anyone can "create" and maintain a forum. They're boiler plate, you simply go to a website, fill out the information and off you go. BoardsofFL was lucky that his in Pensacola at the same time the Pensacola Newspaper folded their forum.
Here is the site from which BoardsofFL established "his" forum.
https://www.forumotion.com/
Fine, so if it is "his" forum than "he" should do whatever he wants with it. It's his toy so it's up to him to decide if someone is causing damage to it and what to do about that.
RealLindaL wrote:Telstar wrote:Markle wrote:Telstar wrote:I know this is probably a dumb question but how and why does Boards have the power to banish anyone? It seems to me that if Boards really does have the power to ban anyone it's very considerate of him to put it to a member vote. Why is it that the member in question does not just turn the tables and banish boards? If Boards has that power because he created, supports and maintains this group than good for Boards, he deserves it. On the other hand if someone is banned why moan and groan about it? They should simply create their own forum page and invite those that enjoy reading their spam/posts to contribute to it, complaining about being banned only points out how powerless and impotent the banee is. I know that I could never create and maintain a forum like this so Boards if you are the real power behind this forum I thank you publicly for providing and maintaining it and allowing me to be informed and heard.
Anyone can "create" and maintain a forum. They're boiler plate, you simply go to a website, fill out the information and off you go. BoardsofFL was lucky that his in Pensacola at the same time the Pensacola Newspaper folded their forum.
Here is the site from which BoardsofFL established "his" forum.
https://www.forumotion.com/
Fine, so if it is "his" forum than "he" should do whatever he wants with it. It's his toy so it's up to him to decide if someone is causing damage to it and what to do about that.
It sure seems that way to me, Telstar. And I never heard there were any contracts here guaranteeing anybody anything, including continuation of the forum.
Salinsky wrote:Hello, folks.
Just checking in.
Boards is under no obligation to host a propagandist who posts material with the potential to do real harm to benevolent organizations, despite the fact that the propagandist has been warned repeatedly to desist.
If you choose to continue to enable this cancer to public discourse, then you will get exactly what you deserve.
Good luck!
Joanimaroni wrote:Contracts?
Vikingwoman wrote:Just ban Markle from politics. That will solve the problem.
RottiesRule wrote:I voted for Boards.
When I get a chance to view the Forum, I prefer thoughtful honest dialogue. Markle seems to inundate the Forum with cut and paste topics that no one responds to and it is tedious. He also never seems to accept when he is proven wrong or apologized.
While I don't condone censorship, I would prefer a Boards version over Markles.
Just my .02.
Markle wrote:RottiesRule wrote:I voted for Boards.
When I get a chance to view the Forum, I prefer thoughtful honest dialogue. Markle seems to inundate the Forum with cut and paste topics that no one responds to and it is tedious. He also never seems to accept when he is proven wrong or apologized.
While I don't condone censorship, I would prefer a Boards version over Markles.
Just my .02.
As you know, my threads spur much discussion. I post facts that I source and provide links to for your convenience.
When I have been wrong about something I posted which was not accurate, I apologize. Look back if you're sincere and view my threads. My posts are met with personal attacks, vitriol, profanity and distractions. Seldom, if ever, do they address the facts and truth I have posted. Why do you suppose that is?
boards of FL wrote:So now we have seen what the forum looks like in the absence of myself, Sal, and viking; and it looks bleak.
Markle wrote:boards of FL wrote:Ole Man Markle appears to be losing his memory. This email is old news and was discussed here last month. The forces mentioned in the email were in fact deployed immediately. We know this because an unredacted version of the email is now available and the forces mentioned corroborate Panettas testimony during Benghazi hearings.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/262756-new-email-splits-benghazi-committee
The Democrats released their email a day after conservative legal group Judicial Watch released a slightly redacted version, which it had won access to under the Freedom of Information Act. At the time, conservative outlets such as Fox News said that the email was a “smoking gun” that undermined testimony from former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.
But the unredacted version of the email makes clear that the forces under discussion to move to Benghazi were the same ones that previous investigations had claimed were on the move: a Marine Fleet Antiterrorism Security Teams (FAST) and a special operations force out of Croatia.
You really need to wean yourself off your far left Socialist sites and branch out. This email was just released with this latest flurry being released weekly. Try to keep up.
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:I finally stepped up and voted for poster Markle.
boards of FL wrote:ZVUGKTUBM wrote:I finally stepped up and voted for poster Markle.
Very disappointing, Z.
boards of FL wrote:Well like I said before. If anyone would like to stay up to date on right-wing fringe FWD emails, and if Markle would like to continue creating all caps threads about them, I'm sure the forum below will welcome you. If anyone would like to still entertain the fraudulent Planned Parenthood videos as objective fact, in spite of the fact that the video creators have in fact been indicted - look no further than the forum below.
http://pensacoladaily.forumotion.com/
Markle wrote:boards of FL wrote:Well like I said before. If anyone would like to stay up to date on right-wing fringe FWD emails, and if Markle would like to continue creating all caps threads about them, I'm sure the forum below will welcome you. If anyone would like to still entertain the fraudulent Planned Parenthood videos as objective fact, in spite of the fact that the video creators have in fact been indicted - look no further than the forum below.
http://pensacoladaily.forumotion.com/
You fail to say what those taking the video were charged with doing.
The video's are factual, you can view them yourself. The entire video's have been made available for viewing.
All cap headlines offend you? Really? How about all 24 point bold responses?
Washington (CNN)A Texas investigation into Planned Parenthood on Monday culminated in an indictment -- of the organization's accusers instead of the group.
The Harris County District Attorney's office announced that Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast had been cleared in the two-month-long investigation.
But the grand jury did indict two individuals who were involved in making secret recordings of the group that were released to publicly discredit the group, which provides health services and abortions.
David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt were indicted for tampering with a governmental record, a second-degree felony, and Daleiden was also indicted on the count of prohibition of the purchase and sale of human organs, a class A misdemeanor, according to the Harris County district attorney.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum