"Yes," Cosby answered on Sept. 29, 2005. "Did you ever give any of these young women the quaaludes without their knowledge?"

2seaoat wrote:Had I done the same in my former capacity with the Federal government with an intern in my employ I'd have been in deep sh*t.  Clinton, though, gets a pass for some reason?   Liberal logic ,who can figure it out?

President Clinton had a bill of impeachment pass in an attempt to punish him for bad behavior. To make a comparison between two adults consenting to sex with Bill Cosby drugging and raping young women is like saying that Denny having a same sex relation with minors in a coach/student relationship is ok.....if you cannot provide honest equivalency, then you stand for nothing.  Bill Cosby was a criminal.  Bill Clinton was a lying cheating husband having sex with a younger adult woman......the same which has ended half the marriages in America......adultery.    familiar........

Markle wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

EmeraldGhost wrote:As to Clinton & Monica Lewinsky .... it's generally considered sexual harassment at a minimum (& possibly rape) for a person in the leadership of an organization to have sex with a young intern ... because it's not an equally consensual situation when the one has unlimited authority to dismiss the other from her position for any or no cause without having to even say why.     Lewinsky should have collected a settlement from the Federal government, IMO ... and Clinton should have been removed from office as any other supervisor/manager in the civil service or military officer would have been .

Had I done the same in my former capacity with the Federal government with an intern in my employ I'd have been in deep sh*t.  Clinton, though, gets a pass for some reason?   Liberal logic ,who can figure it out?

How many was there, Markle? LOL!

No, you're quite wrong. You need to read Lewinski's book. She pursued Clinton not the other way around. She was obsessed w/ him and was quite frank about and what she did. It was not a civil service job and I 'm not sure she even got paid. You can't sue someone for sexual harassment when you're the harasser.

Numerous women successfully sued Gov. then President Clinton for his sexual attacks.  Some are public record but most are confidential settlements.  That was part of the job of the Hillary headed bimbo eruption squad.

Vikingwoman wrote:

Markle wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

EmeraldGhost wrote:As to Clinton & Monica Lewinsky .... it's generally considered sexual harassment at a minimum (& possibly rape) for a person in the leadership of an organization to have sex with a young intern ... because it's not an equally consensual situation when the one has unlimited authority to dismiss the other from her position for any or no cause without having to even say why.     Lewinsky should have collected a settlement from the Federal government, IMO ... and Clinton should have been removed from office as any other supervisor/manager in the civil service or military officer would have been .

Had I done the same in my former capacity with the Federal government with an intern in my employ I'd have been in deep sh*t.  Clinton, though, gets a pass for some reason?   Liberal logic ,who can figure it out?

How many was there, Markle? LOL!

No, you're quite wrong. You need to read Lewinski's book. She pursued Clinton not the other way around. She was obsessed w/ him and was quite frank about and what she did. It was not a civil service job and I 'm not sure she even got paid. You can't sue someone for sexual harassment when you're the harasser.

Numerous women successfully sued Gov. then President Clinton for his sexual attacks.  Some are public record but most are confidential settlements.  That was part of the job of the Hillary headed bimbo eruption squad.

Vikingwoman wrote:You saw it.

Vikingwoman wrote:You better check your laws. 17 is still a minor anywhere and employment rules are just that and there was nothing illegal going on.