Was the death of 22 month old, left in a hot car, an accident?

No accident. Now they have uncovered that the wife as well was researching how long it takes in a hot car to die of heat stroke. Both of them are sick bastards

Gunz wrote:No accident. Now they have uncovered that the wife as well was researching how long it takes in a hot car to die of heat stroke.  Both of them are sick bastards

Sick.....if searching out of curiosity or fear ...why would you need the exact outside temperature?

He only drove 2/10ths of a mile and then forgot he had a kid? And what 22-month old is ever quiet long enough that you could forget them?   

QueenOfHearts wrote:He only drove 2/10ths of a mile and then forgot he had a kid?  And what 22-month old is ever quiet long enough that you could forget them?   

   you are right.

Sal wrote:Prosecutors are gonna have a real hard time making this case. 

you said the same thing about trayvon and that was a slam dunk

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Aw can't we just chalk it off as a late term abortion ? I mean you act like this kid was way past being a fetus or something....

Yes, TEO, you insensitive ass, he was way past the fetal stage.  

I care about ALL babies you are the one that just don't get it....what the hell does it make a difference ? A heart beat is a heart beat !

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Aw can't we just chalk it off as a late term abortion ? I mean you act like this kid was way past being a fetus or something....

Yes, TEO, you insensitive ass, he was way past the fetal stage.  

Why should that make a difference to a fascist eugenics Nazi like you or Dreams?

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsFSZNblYzo

  

Subtle sarcasm seems to be lost here for some..I am anti abortion at all ages from the first heartbeat to a 110 years old...sheesh.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Aw can't we just chalk it off as a late term abortion ? I mean you act like this kid was way past being a fetus or something....

Yes, TEO, you insensitive ass, he was way past the fetal stage.  

I care about ALL babies you are the one that just don't get it....what the hell does it make a difference ? A heart beat is a heart beat  !

How many babies have you carried and brought into the world?

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Aw can't we just chalk it off as a late term abortion ? I mean you act like this kid was way past being a fetus or something....

Yes, TEO, you insensitive ass, he was way past the fetal stage.  

I care about ALL babies you are the one that just don't get it....what the hell does it make a difference ? A heart beat is a heart beat  !

How many babies have you carried and brought into the world?  

Oh I see now to follow your drooling idiotic logic mothers have every right to murder their babies because they carry them.  Dope

More liberal logic...only mothers who bear children can love them

Gunz wrote:More liberal logic...only mothers who bear children can love them

Love and protect them.

Gunz wrote:More liberal logic...only mothers who bear children can love them

Get a grip, Gunz. Loving children has nothing whatever to do with it, but a woman has a bond with a child that can't be experienced by a man. That's just the way of it. I do not favor abortion. This subject, though, comes up very often with Teo. This child was almost 2 years old. Something is creepy and wrong about his death, but the abortion discussion doesn't belong here...it's irrelevant. If you want that practice to stop, which it won't because there are always cases where it's the only option, then educate kids on the consequences of their actions...both boys and girls. That doesn't mean passing judgement on them; nor does it mean killing doctors or blowing up clinics.

Floridatexan wrote:

Gunz wrote:More liberal logic...only mothers who bear children can love them

Get a grip, Gunz.  Loving children has nothing whatever to do with it, but a woman has a bond with a child that can't be experienced by a man.  That's just the way of it.  I do not favor abortion.  This subject, though, comes up very often with Teo.  This child was almost 2 years old.  Something is creepy and wrong about his death, but the abortion discussion doesn't belong here...it's irrelevant.  If you want that practice to stop, which it won't because there are always cases where it's the only option, then educate kids on the consequences of their actions...both boys and girls.  That doesn't mean passing judgement on them; nor does it mean killing doctors or blowing up clinics.

You are not well read are you ? Keep up with your liberal ethics will ya ?

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/03/medical-journalists-call-for-after.html

Stating that newborn babies ‘aren’t people’ and it is therefore acceptable to kill them, two ‘ethicists’ writing for the peer-reviewed Journal of Medical Ethics are now calling for after-birth abortions.

The writers, who worked with Australian universities in the construction of their paper, say that newborn babies simply do not have a “moral right to life.”

Furthermore, the paper goes on to state that the babies have no right to live as they do not offer “at least basic value” that would represent a loss.

Study authors Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, both from the University of Melbourne, state in their paper that “after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.” They go on to say that while it is infanticide, they prefer not to call it that. Instead, they prefer the term ‘after-birth abortion’ — a term that avoids the true labeling of the proposed technique.

Authors of the paper write that simply being a human isn’t something that grants ‘a right to life’. It appears the paper authors believe that they are the ones who are to determine whether or not a human can live or die. Under this train of thought, then these ‘after-birth’ abortions are not limited to infants.


In fact, if being a human does not grant a ‘right to life’, then so-called ‘ethicists’ could soon state that everyone with a disability no longer has the right to live. Does this sound familiar? From 1929 to 1974, the United States began forcibly sterilizing individuals they deemed to not be ‘fit to live’.

During this time period, around 60,000 people were forcibly sterilized nationwide under the admitted eugenics program. The authors of this paper are now recommending that certain human beings simply do not deserve to live, in the same manner of the U.S. government in 1929. The authors even take it a step further, going from sterilizations to full-blown murders — genocide on a larger scale.

The paper states:

Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.
[...]
Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life. Indeed, many humans are not considered subjects of a right to life…

Are you really that ignorant?      

Floridatexan wrote:
Are you really that ignorant?      

You must be thinking out loud about yourself again....

For the life of me I don't understand why T gets beat up by certain ones on here for being so passionate about an unborn childs right to life.

no stress wrote:For the life of me I don't understand why T gets beat up by certain ones on here for being so passionate about an unborn childs right to life.  

Because his opinion is not instep with Democrats.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/police-dad-sexted-girl-17-pictures-while-son-was-dying-in-hot-car/

MARIETTA, Ga. - A judge has ordered that the Georgia man charged with murder in his young son's death inside a hot car be held without bond in preparation for a trial.

At Thursday's bond and probable cause hearing, a detective testified that Justin Harris, 33, was "sexting" pornographic images of himself to multiple women, including a 17-year-old girl, while his son was dying inside a hot SUV on June 18.

Cobb County Police Detective Phil Stoddard also testified that there were two life insurance policies on 22-month-old Cooper. One was for $2,000 and the other, which was acquired in November 2012, was for $25,000.

Stoddard described evidence that prosecutors say shows that Harris intentionally left the child in the car, was practically leading a double life and should not be granted bond.

The detective said Harris, who told police he accidentally forgot to take the boy to daycare, had been exchanging nude photos with up to six women while he was at work the day the child died. He also said that the investigation revealed Harris had a habit of speaking with various women through computer-related messaging services and had even met up with some women and told at least one that he had cheated on his wife before.

The detective also said that in the weeks before Cooper's death, Harris did an Internet search for "how to survive in prison" and had looked at websites that advocated living a "child-free" life.

Defense attorney Maddox Kilgore argued that the evidence involving Harris' Internet and texting activities had no bearing on his client's intent and was being used simply to publicly shame him.

rossharris1.jpg
Justin Harris with his son, Cooper.

CBS ATLANTA
According to Stoddard, Harris told police that on the morning of June 18, he went to breakfast with his son at Chick-fil-A, then strapped the child into his car seat and gave him a kiss. Harris was supposed to drive the child to daycare, but he told police he instead drove to work without realizing that his son was in the backseat.

Stoddard said Thursday that the drive from Chick-fil-A to Harris' workplace is approximately .6 miles and that about one-tenth of a mile away from Chick-fil-A, there is a stoplight where Harris would have had to turn to go to the daycare.

Instead, Harris didn't turn and the child was left in the car alone for about seven hours while his father went to work at Home Depot's corporate office.

The temperature that day was 88 degrees at 5:16 p.m., according to a police warrant filed the day the child died. The medical examiner's office ruled the child died of hyperthermia and the manner of death was ruled a homicide.

Detective Stoddard said authorities obtained surveillance video from the parking lot of Harris' workplace on the day the child died and determined that Harris left work at lunchtime with friends and when he returned, he opened the driver's side door of his vehicle to place a bag of light bulbs he had just purchased inside before going back into his workplace. The toddler was in the car at that time.

Kilgore, the defense attorney, argued that showed Harris did not intentionally leave the boy in the car.

"If that were the case, why in the world would he bring his colleagues right up to the car?" he asked.

Alex Hall, one of the people Harris went to lunch with that day, testified Thursday that Harris talked about how much he loved his son all the time. He said he and Harris had planned to go to the movies after work that day.

"Nothing stuck out," Hall, who has been a friend of Harris since their sophomore year of college and is a co-worker at Home Depot, said. "Nothing was weird."

When Harris left work for the day at around 4:15 p.m., the detective said, surveillance video showed him driving out of the parking lot with his windows up, which is relevant because even hours later, when authorities searched his car, it had a strong, foul smell of decomposition.

Harris left his work parking lot, drove further down the road, and then pulled over in a strip mall parking lot, screamed for help and took the child, who was already dead, out of the car and placed him on the ground. A defense witness testified that Harris appeared to be extremely upset and was trying to do CPR on his son.

"He was saying, 'Oh my God, oh my God, my son is dead, oh my God,'" witness Leonard Madden said.

When authorities responded to the scene, an officer told Harris to get off his cell phone, Stoddard said. Harris twice refused, using profanity, and was then arrested. The detective said that Harris showed no emotion while being interviewed by investigators.

Stoddard also addressed search warrants released over the weekend which said Harris and his wife - the child's mother - told investigators they both had done research on the Internet on what temperature could cause a child's death in a vehicle because they feared such a thing might happen. Stoddard said the searches were conducted prior to the child's death.

The child's mother, Leanna Harris, has not been charged in the death and police have not called her a suspect. Leanna Harris reportedly is standing by her husband and says she believes he is innocent.

Stoddard testified Thursday that Leanna Harris went to pick up the 22-month-old at daycare on June 18 but was told by workers there that her husband had never dropped the boy off. Upon hearing this, Stoddard said, Leanna Harris became calm and said her husband "must have left him in the car."

When police later informed Leanna Harris that her son had died, Stoddard said she showed no emotion, other than saying it was "her worst nightmare" and asked to see her husband.

At one point, when Leanna Harris was reunited with her husband, she asked, "Did you say too much?," the detective said.

Sounds like they both should be chained into a hot car all day.

It is hard to envision somebody this stupid.......but it has happened over 700 times over the last 15 years......cars are inherently dangerous for a toddler.

Joanimaroni wrote:

no stress wrote:For the life of me I don't understand why T gets beat up by certain ones on here for being so passionate about an unborn childs right to life.  

Because his opinion is not instep with Democrats.

I hate to think it's just a political point. I feel deeper than that... I think most dems do too.

Some things simply aren't everybodies business.