nsureme wrote:
I'm pretty partial to my avatar. Besides, the whole choosing someones avatar thing just seems a little juvenile to me.
Juvenile?
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Who will you vote for?
nsureme wrote:
I'm pretty partial to my avatar. Besides, the whole choosing someones avatar thing just seems a little juvenile to me.
Margin Call wrote:nsureme wrote:
I'm pretty partial to my avatar. Besides, the whole choosing someones avatar thing just seems a little juvenile to me.
Juvenile?
Bob wrote:Uh oh. Looks like my vote has just invalidated the thread title. lol
edit: I may be senile because now I'm not sure what the thread title was before I voted. Earlier it had announced a winner. lol
nsureme wrote:salinsky wrote:Reputable polling firms do not standardize their results by party affiliation.
The only large polling firm that does so is Rasmussen.
This is because party affiliation is fluid, not static.
If there was an enthusiasm gap in favor of the Republicans it would be showing up in the polls.
It has not.
Whether or not pollsters standardize by party isn't the issue. If you look at the numbers of many polls you will see that they poll more self identified democrats then republicans. I'm curious about how you came to the conclusion that party affiliation is fluid. Are you suggesting that large numbers of people change party affiliation on a regular basis?
salinsky wrote:nsureme wrote:salinsky wrote:Reputable polling firms do not standardize their results by party affiliation.
The only large polling firm that does so is Rasmussen.
This is because party affiliation is fluid, not static.
If there was an enthusiasm gap in favor of the Republicans it would be showing up in the polls.
It has not.
Whether or not pollsters standardize by party isn't the issue. If you look at the numbers of many polls you will see that they poll more self identified democrats then republicans. I'm curious about how you came to the conclusion that party affiliation is fluid. Are you suggesting that large numbers of people change party affiliation on a regular basis?
People are more willing to answer polls and self-identify when they are enthusiastic about their candidate.
When they are ambivalent, they are less likely to answer the polls and self-identify.
It's just basic human nature.
This explains why the polls seemed to more heavily sample Dems after an exciting DNCC, seemed more heavily weighted toward Repukes after a strong first debate, and evened out since then.
Dreamsglore wrote:ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Hey, I wonder if PaceDog voted for Romney in your poll with both of his socks?
You know he did just like the others ones did. Honesty is not in republicans vocabulary.
salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:It'll be close, but early voting in Hillsborough and Pasco has already set records, and as the I4 corridor goes, so goes FLA.
Care to make our own personal bet? Avatars for a month. Winner picks the losers avatar. Just for Florida's electoral votes.
A deciscion sooner is better then later sal. Tuesday is too late.
Thinking? tic toc.
It's only an avatar bet sal. Not liking I'm asking you to man up and meet face to face or anything. You can still post your idiotic dribble. Only with an avatar that matches your character.
You're on, c-face.
Why don't you want to meet me face-to-face?
I already offered to provide you my personal info for less than half of what you were offering others for it.
I'll be in Jax on Tuesday.
Wanna shake hands?
nsureme wrote:
Not implying that you are juvenile. The whole picking the avatar thing just seems silly to me. Maybe I'm just old.
Margin Call wrote:nsureme wrote:
Not implying that you are juvenile. The whole picking the avatar thing just seems silly to me. Maybe I'm just old.
Poopy head!
nsureme wrote:Margin Call wrote:nsureme wrote:
Not implying that you are juvenile. The whole picking the avatar thing just seems silly to me. Maybe I'm just old.
Poopy head!
I was wrong. You are juvenile.
ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:It'll be close, but early voting in Hillsborough and Pasco has already set records, and as the I4 corridor goes, so goes FLA.
Care to make our own personal bet? Avatars for a month. Winner picks the losers avatar. Just for Florida's electoral votes.
A deciscion sooner is better then later sal. Tuesday is too late.
Thinking? tic toc.
It's only an avatar bet sal. Not liking I'm asking you to man up and meet face to face or anything. You can still post your idiotic dribble. Only with an avatar that matches your character.
You're on, c-face.
Why don't you want to meet me face-to-face?
I already offered to provide you my personal info for less than half of what you were offering others for it.
I'll be in Jax on Tuesday.
Wanna shake hands?
It's close but I have an avatar picked out for you already. I hope you enjoy it.
salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:It'll be close, but early voting in Hillsborough and Pasco has already set records, and as the I4 corridor goes, so goes FLA.
Care to make our own personal bet? Avatars for a month. Winner picks the losers avatar. Just for Florida's electoral votes.
A deciscion sooner is better then later sal. Tuesday is too late.
Thinking? tic toc.
It's only an avatar bet sal. Not liking I'm asking you to man up and meet face to face or anything. You can still post your idiotic dribble. Only with an avatar that matches your character.
You're on, c-face.
Why don't you want to meet me face-to-face?
I already offered to provide you my personal info for less than half of what you were offering others for it.
I'll be in Jax on Tuesday.
Wanna shake hands?
It's close but I have an avatar picked out for you already. I hope you enjoy it.
You want to concede now, or wait for the recount?
salinsky wrote:salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:It'll be close, but early voting in Hillsborough and Pasco has already set records, and as the I4 corridor goes, so goes FLA.
Care to make our own personal bet? Avatars for a month. Winner picks the losers avatar. Just for Florida's electoral votes.
A deciscion sooner is better then later sal. Tuesday is too late.
Thinking? tic toc.
It's only an avatar bet sal. Not liking I'm asking you to man up and meet face to face or anything. You can still post your idiotic dribble. Only with an avatar that matches your character.
You're on, c-face.
Why don't you want to meet me face-to-face?
I already offered to provide you my personal info for less than half of what you were offering others for it.
I'll be in Jax on Tuesday.
Wanna shake hands?
It's close but I have an avatar picked out for you already. I hope you enjoy it.
You want to concede now, or wait for the recount?
Ghandi?
Anybody seen, Ghandi?
ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:ghandi wrote:salinsky wrote:It'll be close, but early voting in Hillsborough and Pasco has already set records, and as the I4 corridor goes, so goes FLA.
Care to make our own personal bet? Avatars for a month. Winner picks the losers avatar. Just for Florida's electoral votes.
A deciscion sooner is better then later sal. Tuesday is too late.
Thinking? tic toc.
It's only an avatar bet sal. Not liking I'm asking you to man up and meet face to face or anything. You can still post your idiotic dribble. Only with an avatar that matches your character.
You're on, c-face.
Why don't you want to meet me face-to-face?
I already offered to provide you my personal info for less than half of what you were offering others for it.
I'll be in Jax on Tuesday.
Wanna shake hands?
It's close but I have an avatar picked out for you already. I hope you enjoy it.
You want to concede now, or wait for the recount?
Ghandi?
Anybody seen, Ghandi?
Lets wait till it's been officially called.
salinsky wrote:Uh oh ...
WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney’s campaign conceded on Thursday that it lost Florida, as votes continue to be tallied more than 36 hours after the election was called for President Barack Obama.
"The numbers in Florida show this was winnable," Brett Doster, Romney's senior adviser in Florida, told the Miami Herald in a statement. "We thought based on our polling and range of organization that we had done what we needed to win. Obviously, we didn't, and for that I and every other operative in Florida has a sick feeling that we left something on the table. I can assure you this won't happen again.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/08/mitt-romney-florida_n_2094638.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
salinsky wrote:Please place this link into "link to an off-site avatar" option at your earliest convenience.
http://reason.com/assets/mc/mwelch/2011_04/Obama_blingee.gif
salinski wrote:salinsky wrote:Please place this link into "link to an off-site avatar" option at your earliest convenience.
http://reason.com/assets/mc/mwelch/2011_04/Obama_blingee.gif
That's your choice?
I overestimated you. But not by much.
Last edited by Ghandi_is_my_bitch on 11/12/2012, 1:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
salinsky wrote:salinski wrote:salinsky wrote:Please place this link into "link to an off-site avatar" option at your earliest convenience.
http://reason.com/assets/mc/mwelch/2011_04/Obama_blingee.gif
That's your choice?
I overestimated you. But not by much.
LOL!
A welcher ... woulda guessed it?
salinski wrote:salinsky wrote:salinski wrote:salinsky wrote:Please place this link into "link to an off-site avatar" option at your earliest convenience.
http://reason.com/assets/mc/mwelch/2011_04/Obama_blingee.gif
That's your choice?
I overestimated you. But not by much.
LOL!
A welcher ... woulda guessed it?
You and wtm use the same exact words. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Again, how did I welch? The bet was avatars for a month. Did I welch? NO.
Your avatar, your name. Not a welch. retard.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|