Divide and Conquer tactic used by Boards

Joanimaroni wrote:LOL....I couldn'T care less about the Politics here.

boards of FL wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:LOL....I couldn'T care less about the Politics here.

You're slurring.  Did you drink a box of wine again?

What? wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Obviously this was meant for everybody to see and I think it's a great idea. I would not ever follow you people to another forum. I think you all belong together.

That's their plan goof ball.

Vikingwoman wrote:Rest assured DE, nobody is pining to join a forum w/ you except your cohorts. Arrevaderchi!

Vikingwoman wrote: I just hope you don't come back here pushing your sex w/ family members agenda.

Joanimaroni wrote:DE...the forum is not just politics...that us a small part. It is a connection for many that have developed a friendship/camaraderie.

Vikingwoman wrote:

What? wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:Obviously this was meant for everybody to see and I think it's a great idea. I would not ever follow you people to another forum. I think you all belong together.

That's their plan goof ball.

Good! Sounds like a good plan. Chow.

boards of FL wrote:Can we get a courtesy flush?  

(sprays air freshener)

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:While I am no particular proponent of poster Markle, I certainly will not join the mob that has taken to the streets and who can't wait for his lynching on Friday afternoon.



In studying Boards' posts, he obviously has made up his mind already. I wonder how much consideration North Korea's Kim Jong Un puts into a decision to have one of his uncles sent before a public firing squad in Pyonyang ? This move with Markle is kind of like that.

I will go on record reiterating my belief that poster Markle should not be summarily banned from the forum. Especially when others have been given timeouts, etc. and warnings of where they have stepped over some sort of line.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:While I am no particular proponent of poster Markle, I certainly will not join the mob that has taken to the streets and who can't wait for his lynching on Friday afternoon.



In studying Boards' posts, he obviously has made up his mind already. I wonder how much consideration North Korea's Kim Jong Un puts into a decision to have one of his uncles sent before a public firing squad in Pyonyang ? This move with Markle is kind of like that.

I will go on record reiterating my belief that poster Markle should not be summarily banned from the forum. Especially when others have been given timeouts, etc. and warnings of where they have stepped over some sort of line.

Floridatexan wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:While I am no particular proponent of poster Markle, I certainly will not join the mob that has taken to the streets and who can't wait for his lynching on Friday afternoon.



In studying Boards' posts, he obviously has made up his mind already. I wonder how much consideration North Korea's Kim Jong Un puts into a decision to have one of his uncles sent before a public firing squad in Pyonyang ? This move with Markle is kind of like that.

I will go on record reiterating my belief that poster Markle should not be summarily banned from the forum. Especially when others have been given timeouts, etc. and warnings of where they have stepped over some sort of line.

IT'S BOARDS' FORUM!!!  What part of that is unclear?  He can ban whomever he wants.  Firing squad?  Really?  

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:While I am no particular proponent of poster Markle, I certainly will not join the mob that has taken to the streets and who can't wait for his lynching on Friday afternoon.



In studying Boards' posts, he obviously has made up his mind already. I wonder how much consideration North Korea's Kim Jong Un puts into a decision to have one of his uncles sent before a public firing squad in Pyonyang ? This move with Markle is kind of like that.

I will go on record reiterating my belief that poster Markle should not be summarily banned from the forum. Especially when others have been given timeouts, etc. and warnings of where they have stepped over some sort of line.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Did I not say a mob has taken to the streets over this? Geeeezzz.....

boards of FL wrote:Just did a little spring cleaning.

Tell riceme to stay over in the knitting circle.

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:Just did a little spring cleaning.  

Tell riceme to stay over in the knitting circle.

What do you mean by that? Are you just arbitrarily banning people again?

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:Just did a little spring cleaning.  

Tell riceme to stay over in the knitting circle.

What do you mean by that? Are you just arbitrarily banning people again?

I'm not sure that 'ban' is the correct term.  More like 'deleted'.  She has her knitting circle, so there is really no need for her to come here and dictate what type of content will remain for those who actually participate on this forum.

You won't understand what I just said because it requires the ability to think critically.

Salinsky wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:Just did a little spring cleaning.  

Tell riceme to stay over in the knitting circle.

What do you mean by that? Are you just arbitrarily banning people again?

I'm not sure that 'ban' is the correct term.  More like 'deleted'.  She has her knitting circle, so there is really no need for her to come here and dictate what type of content will remain for those who actually participate on this forum.

You won't understand what I just said because it requires the ability to think critically.

Do you have the ability to see who voted and who has been visiting the site in hidden mode.

I mean What?/KarlRove/PaceDog/Obamasucks/etc probably has the ability to cast 10-20 votes all by his lonesome.