Republicans say goodbye to Latino vote. Makes 2016 impossible for them!

Damaged Eagle wrote:

Run Forest run.

*****ROFLMAO*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:People are going to utilize various explanations to explain what they can't understand. Isolate them and give them no training at all and they will fill their world with explanations on how things work. Do you think they'll always be correct? I don't.

Religion emerges from assigning a blanket supernatural answer to that which you don't understand.  

Why does that big bright thing rise and set everyday?  I don't know.  It must be some supernatural thing.

Why does it get colder and then warmer sometimes?  I don't know.  It must be some supernatural thing.

Eventually we actually learn how to answer these questions.  Why do I have to repeat this to you again and again?  Of course religion's vague guesses involving the supernatural are wrong.  They were postulated by ignorant people who didn't understand what stars, planets, and solar systems are.  Of course the mythical explanations of the world are wrong.  Of course geographically isolated people will come up with varying made-up answers to explain things they don't understand, all of which are wrong.  They're made up!  By ignorant people!  Who had only a faint grasp of the natural world!

Got it. Everyone's ignorant except you.

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:Got it. Everyone's ignorant except you.

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Damaged Eagle wrote:Except when the expected data doesn't correlate with the predictions for 'global warming' because 'global warming' is accepted fact or as some say "the science is set'.

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Damaged Eagle wrote:But it is a creation theory none the less.

No.  It isn't.  

Damaged Eagle wrote:They're all arriving at the conclusion even though the incoming data doesn't match the predictions... Wow! That's great science. I'm sure there's a lot of physicists that would agree with those methods... Not!

I have no interest in wading into the specifics of climate science with you when you can't even stay on task here in this thread.  For several posts now, you have managed to quote me and add some text, but you haven't managed to directly respond to anything I'm saying.  

I'm over here talking about science and religion.  You're avoiding that and trying to pull me into climate science, you're telling me I want to kidnap children, and you're telling me that I want to raze villages in Libya.  

I'll leave you with this, since you're obviously done with the science/religion back and forth (or, more correctly, you never started).

http://www.learningrx.com/reading-help-for-adults-faq.htm

Damaged Eagle wrote:You're right we are talking about science and religion...

So now you're saying that 'global warming' or climate change isn't science now?

boards of FL wrote:


See the M.O.?

1)  Quote

2)  Misinterpret (or, fail to comprehend what you quoted)

3)  Add a small blurb so as to feel as if you have directly responded.  

We could do this all day.  I write a paragraph or three, you chop that up and insert one-liners that do not actually respond to anything I said.

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:You're right we are talking about science and religion...

So now you're saying that 'global warming' or climate change isn't science now?

No.

With that said, have you any responses to the underlying subject matter or anything that I have actually said, or are you just looking to change the subject to climate change?

Wordslinger wrote:The thread is about the republicans openly driving off Latino electoral support, not about religion or any of Cripple Eagle's eccentric "let me lead us knowwhere" dialogues.

The fact remains as I stated -- without the Latino vote the republicans can't win in 2016.  

You republicans have chosen to stand hard on not allowing illegals under any circumstance to remain in the U.S.  I applaud your grit, your loyalty to values, and your masochistic policies.  Really I do.  

LOL

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:You're right we are talking about science and religion...

So now you're saying that 'global warming' or climate change isn't science now?

No.

With that said, have you any responses to the underlying subject matter or anything that I have actually said, or are you just looking to change the subject to climate change?

So is that a 'No it's not science' or a 'No it is science'.

You really should clarify because earlier on you said models that didn't match predictions should be thrown out and if it is science we have a problem here with you being clear about what you say.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tRdBsnX4N4

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Damaged Eagle wrote:You're right we are talking about science and religion...

So now you're saying that 'global warming' or climate change isn't science now?

No.

With that said, have you any responses to the underlying subject matter or anything that I have actually said, or are you just looking to change the subject to climate change?

So is that a 'No it's not science' or a 'No it is science'.

You really should clarify because earlier on you said models that didn't match predictions should be thrown out and if it is science we have a problem here with you being clear about what you say.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tRdBsnX4N4

You asked me a fairly straightforward question.  My answer to that was "no".  

It's bad enough that you couldn't decipher the answer to your question simply from reading my posts, but to even fail to comprehend "no"....damn.

boards of FL wrote:I'm over here talking about science and religion.  You're avoiding that and trying to pull me into climate science,...

Wordslinger wrote:No matter how our acid-dropping rockstar super fan tries to dice and slice it,
by harshly opposing Obama's immigration plan, the party of no has made certain they will not have Latino votes in the next elections.

The issue has nothing to do with science, or religion.

There's nothing scientific or religious in insisting that all illegal Latinos have to go home.  The republicans have every right to express their opinion on the issue and I'm overjoyed that they have done so!

Reality.