2seaoat wrote:Bs... please link this assertion you keep making.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
next.....oh racist one who hides those beliefs conveniently behind a bundle of libertarian mumbo jumbo which eliminates the very government which has freed Americans from Jim Crow. The Republican Party at the core is the party of racist. I grew up with a Republican Party which proudly freed the slaves and actively attacked Jim Crow.......yet you really are that lacking in cognitive ability, or integrity.....either way it does not change reality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dixiecrat&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop
The party did not run local or state candidates, and after the 1948 election its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party. The Dixiecrats had little short-run impact on politics. However, they did have a long-term impact. The Dixiecrats began the weakening of the "Solid South" (the Democratic Party's total control of presidential elections in the South).
The term "Dixiecrat" is sometimes used by Northern Democrats to refer to all conservative white Southern Democrats from the 1940s to the 1990s, regardless of where they stood in 1948.
The States' Rights Democratic Party dissolved after the 1948 election, as Truman, the Democratic National Committee, and the New Deal Southern Democrats acted to ensure that the Dixiecrat movement would not return in the 1952 presidential election. Some local diehards, such as Leander Perez of Louisiana, attempted to keep it in existence in their districts. Regardless of the power struggle within the Democratic Party concerning segregation policy, the South remained a strongly Democratic voting bloc for local, state, and federal Congressional elections, but not in presidential elections.