New forum rule

Dreamsglore wrote:Nobody's forcing anyone to read Seaoat's posts. Just don't read them.

Dreamsglore wrote:Nobody's forcing anyone to read Seaoat's posts. Just don't read them.

Sal wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Some people like Brussels sprouts others don't and I don't think anyone should be forced to eat them..

Hey, T ...

... why are you shooting a gay pride beam out of your eye hole?



lol

Dreamsglore wrote:Nobody's forcing anyone to read Seaoat's posts. Just don't read them.

2seaoat wrote:The cancer thread had one individual call T a sick puppy.  I agreed.  I then linked what I thought was a continued sick ideology of a nazi which was represented by the things he posted.  I appreciate your defense Dreams, but I will never face Chemo, perhaps some targeted radiation, but my response was not personal or emotional.  It went to the core of the anti intellectual book burning beliefs of nazis, and tried to show that in fact a person could be as sick as BP repeatedly posting filth here under the guise of free expression.   Again, when BP  posted filth......he consistently got a response from me.....unlike now when people want to ostracize me, he threatened to beat me up......I laugh at the thought, a typical bully trying to intimidate me.....I eat bullies for lunch, so if I believe that the filth that T posts is not random, but connected to a core ideology he holds dear, am I mistaken what I have seen over the last 6 years, or perhaps Dreams is correct that I am a sensitive individual who needs protection from photos of the ravishes of cancer........yea thats the ticket.....me sensitive....hardly, but the impact of nazi doctrine on health care, democracy, and equal justice for all is an entire other matter, and I am simply tired of when somebody correctly calls somebody's post sick, that we do not hold all of his posts to the same standard we would if BP posted inappropriate things.   BP was a hero to many.  An ally to many.  So the idea of the same people who supported his filth to now think that I am driven by some seventh grade sense of inclusion is amusing.  I will continue to call a sick ideology what it is technically called.  Nazism.

Chrissy wrote:

2seaoat wrote:The cancer thread had one individual call T a sick puppy.  I agreed.  I then linked what I thought was a continued sick ideology of a nazi which was represented by the things he posted.  I appreciate your defense Dreams, but I will never face Chemo, perhaps some targeted radiation, but my response was not personal or emotional.  It went to the core of the anti intellectual book burning beliefs of nazis, and tried to show that in fact a person could be as sick as BP repeatedly posting filth here under the guise of free expression.   Again, when BP  posted filth......he consistently got a response from me.....unlike now when people want to ostracize me, he threatened to beat me up......I laugh at the thought, a typical bully trying to intimidate me.....I eat bullies for lunch, so if I believe that the filth that T posts is not random, but connected to a core ideology he holds dear, am I mistaken what I have seen over the last 6 years, or perhaps Dreams is correct that I am a sensitive individual who needs protection from photos of the ravishes of cancer........yea thats the ticket.....me sensitive....hardly, but the impact of nazi doctrine on health care, democracy, and equal justice for all is an entire other matter, and I am simply tired of when somebody correctly calls somebody's post sick, that we do not hold all of his posts to the same standard we would if BP posted inappropriate things.   BP was a hero to many.  An ally to many.  So the idea of the same people who supported his filth to now think that I am driven by some seventh grade sense of inclusion is amusing.  I will continue to call a sick ideology what it is technically called.  Nazism.

There's just one tiny little problem with your theory. I know you will ignore it.

Teo is about as anti war/anti violence as any I have ever met. NAZI's ARE NOT.

Personally to me, you calling anyone a Nazi isn't such a big deal. Its the way at which you are "ON ATTACK" all over the forum that is the issue. You've gone over the deep end and you went over the line when you associated Teo with a child molester, just like you did me on that one thread.

So what you don't realize is, You've lost the debate. You are now reduced to a simple name caller, a flamer which is one level under a troll.  

Mr Ichi wrote:The rest of the story............

When I was having trouble with my eyes, BP sent me a PM and gave me a reference to a Eye doctor in Alabama that was kin to him.  Sure enough I called the Doctor and we had a nice talk and resolved some questions I had....
Later on BP,IMHO, got a little overbearing with his posts about Seaoats and the PNJ.  I asked him to meet me for lunch so we could talk.  He listened to what I had to say but was somewhat non committed to change his views or actions.  It was OK by me as I just wanted to state my views in person.  
I never ran any type of back ground check or anything else on him(why should I?)  so it was a complete surprise when I saw him in the PNJ.
I do not know the details of his charges or if he has been found guilty.  
So there is my link to BP.  Knock your self out.  LOL

Chrissy wrote:

2seaoat wrote:The cancer thread had one individual call T a sick puppy.  I agreed.  I then linked what I thought was a continued sick ideology of a nazi which was represented by the things he posted.  I appreciate your defense Dreams, but I will never face Chemo, perhaps some targeted radiation, but my response was not personal or emotional.  It went to the core of the anti intellectual book burning beliefs of nazis, and tried to show that in fact a person could be as sick as BP repeatedly posting filth here under the guise of free expression.   Again, when BP  posted filth......he consistently got a response from me.....unlike now when people want to ostracize me, he threatened to beat me up......I laugh at the thought, a typical bully trying to intimidate me.....I eat bullies for lunch, so if I believe that the filth that T posts is not random, but connected to a core ideology he holds dear, am I mistaken what I have seen over the last 6 years, or perhaps Dreams is correct that I am a sensitive individual who needs protection from photos of the ravishes of cancer........yea thats the ticket.....me sensitive....hardly, but the impact of nazi doctrine on health care, democracy, and equal justice for all is an entire other matter, and I am simply tired of when somebody correctly calls somebody's post sick, that we do not hold all of his posts to the same standard we would if BP posted inappropriate things.   BP was a hero to many.  An ally to many.  So the idea of the same people who supported his filth to now think that I am driven by some seventh grade sense of inclusion is amusing.  I will continue to call a sick ideology what it is technically called.  Nazism.

There's just one tiny little problem with your theory. I know you will ignore it.

Teo is about as anti war/anti violence as any I have ever met. NAZI's ARE NOT.

Personally to me, you calling anyone a Nazi isn't such a big deal. Its the way at which you are "ON ATTACK" all over the forum that is the issue. You've gone over the deep end and you went over the line when you associated Teo with a child molester, just like you did me on that one thread.

So what you don't realize is, You've lost the debate. You are now reduced to a simple name caller, a flamer which is one level under a troll.  

2seaoat wrote:So there is my link to BP.  Knock your self out.  LOL

I was not talking about your link to BP.  Our discussions about Maritime Park were spirited and his threats against me happened when I questioned his efforts to personally attack the owners of the fish house and his attempts to attack the leasehold.  He threatened me with physical violence.  He is a big boy, but I have never worried about that aspect of threats.  You did absolutely nothing wrong in that connection, and my reference was to others who allowed his conduct to go unchecked when he was wrong in his behavior.

2seaoat wrote:Seagoat is trying to intimidate and bully Teo w the nazi pejorative. He apparently would like to run him off... but thinks that he can diminish him or his beliefs if nothing else. I'm glad Teo hasn't taken offense... this really has nothing to do with ideology.

We do get a glimpse into Seagoats nature however... it's thin skinned, small, petty, and mean spirited.

If this context of the discussion was limited to the last week, I would agree with all your comments.  I have had this ongoing discussion with T for six years.  He fails to see his posts as hateful and prejudiced, and absolutely consistent with Nazi doctrine.   Is it an accident that Nazi hate sites are used as references.   In his defense, he has toned down much of his stuff in the absence of the other known nazis who have left the forum at the PNJ and in 2006 it was like a white power meeting on the old pnj forum.  I have run T off at least two times questioning him about this very subject.  He will admit the same if he is honest.  So, like most of your paradigms, you take a very little data and try to create a reality which is not entirely correct.   I do not want to see child pornography on this forum, and I do not want this to become a trash can for nazi hate.  It is that simple.  I have no power to stop a person from posting child pornography other than to voice my opinion.  I have no power to stop a person from posting nazi filth.  I can just post my opinion.  I stand on my observations over the years and the clear nature of the filth.

2seaoat wrote:Really?

You've run Teo off 2 times?

Youre such a big man arnt cha? No


Nope......deep down I think Teo has strong christian beliefs.  Some of what he posts most certainly is contrary to that belief system.  Nobody likes to be called a Nazi, and certainly nobody likes to have to defend themselves, but nobody would like to be called a child pornographer.  The filth stands on its own merits independent of the mean Seaoat who talks about that nazi stuff.
I certainly am not responsible for a personal decision a person has to leave this site.  The conflicts and contradictions are simply observed and commented.  It does not make it right.  People getting angry with me.....grab a ticket and get in line.

Mr Ichi wrote:The rest of the story............

When I was having trouble with my eyes, BP sent me a PM and gave me a reference to a Eye doctor in Alabama that was kin to him.  Sure enough I called the Doctor and we had a nice talk and resolved some questions I had....
Later on BP,IMHO, got a little overbearing with his posts about Seaoats and the PNJ.  I asked him to meet me for lunch so we could talk.  He listened to what I had to say but was somewhat non committed to change his views or actions.  It was OK by me as I just wanted to state my views in person.  
I never ran any type of back ground check or anything else on him(why should I?)  so it was a complete surprise when I saw him in the PNJ.
I do not know the details of his charges or if he has been found guilty.  
So there is my link to BP.  Knock your self out.  LOL

Dreamsglore wrote:I don't care what any of you say. There were some low and cheap shots at Seaoat regarding his cancer especially from Hallmark. I'm talking about below the ground low and not one of you called foul. Those kind of remarks are what you would expect from Chrissy and GBB. Now you're trying to jump on Seaoat for calling Teo a Nazi. Unfrigginbelieveable.

Dreamsglore wrote:He didn't just post a thread about cancer treatment. He posted pictures of a woman in the stages of dying of cancer.Big difference. How do you defend that? I don't get it? Whether Seaoat was offended or not I was offended about that shit for him. It was totally inhumane.