Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Clinton's Real Email Scandal ....

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Sal

Sal

.... is that a bullshit story has dominated the campaign.

Read the whole thing.

It's a very good primer for Markle, PkrBum, and PeeDawg who obviously don't have a grasp of the issues.


Network newscasts have, remarkably, dedicated more airtime to coverage of Clinton’s emails than to all policy issues combined.

Cable news has been, if anything, worse, and many prestige outlets have joined the pileup. One malign result of obsessive email coverage is that the public is left totally unaware of the policy stakes in the election. Another is that the constant vague recitations of the phrase ‘‘Clinton email scandal’’ have firmly implanted the notion that there is something scandalous about anything involving Hillary Clinton an email, including her campaign manager getting hacked or the revelation that one of her aides sometimes checked mail on her husband’s computer.

But none of this is true. Clinton broke no laws according to the FBI itself. Her setup gave her no power to evade federal transparency laws beyond what anyone who has a personal email account of any kind has. Her stated explanation for her conduct is entirely believable, fits the facts perfectly, and is entirely plausible to anyone who doesn't simply start with the assumption that she's guilty of something.

Given Powell’s conduct, Clinton wasn't even breaking with an informal precedent. The very worst you can say is that, faced with an annoying government IT policy, she used her stature to find a personal workaround rather than a systemic fix that would work for everyone. To spend so much time on such a trivial matter would be absurd in a city council race, much less a presidential election. To do so in circumstances when it advances the electoral prospects of a rival who has shattered all precedents in terms of lacking transparency or basic honesty is infinitely more scandalous than anything related to the server itself.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit

Guest


Guest

She's a dirty corrupt pathological liar with horrible judgement... she obviously can't help herself.

I know it must suck that an election takes into account ethics and judgement...

tough shit... you deserve to sweat for supporting her.

Sal

Sal

PkrBum wrote:She's a dirty corrupt pathological liar with horrible judgement... she obviously can't help herself.

I know it must suck that an election takes into account ethics and judgement...

tough shit... you deserve to sweat for supporting her.

Didn't have time to read it?

That's OK.

It's undoubtedly over your head.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:.... is that a bullshit story has dominated the campaign.

Read the whole thing.

It's a very good primer for Markle, PkrBum, and PeeDawg who obviously don't have a grasp of the issues.


Network newscasts have, remarkably, dedicated more airtime to coverage of Clinton’s emails than to all policy issues combined.

Cable news has been, if anything, worse, and many prestige outlets have joined the pileup. One malign result of obsessive email coverage is that the public is left totally unaware of the policy stakes in the election. Another is that the constant vague recitations of the phrase ‘‘Clinton email scandal’’ have firmly implanted the notion that there is something scandalous about anything involving Hillary Clinton an email, including her campaign manager getting hacked or the revelation that one of her aides sometimes checked mail on her husband’s computer.

But none of this is true. Clinton broke no laws according to the FBI itself. Her setup gave her no power to evade federal transparency laws beyond what anyone who has a personal email account of any kind has. Her stated explanation for her conduct is entirely believable, fits the facts perfectly, and is entirely plausible to anyone who doesn't simply start with the assumption that she's guilty of something.

Given Powell’s conduct, Clinton wasn't even breaking with an informal precedent. The very worst you can say is that, faced with an annoying government IT policy, she used her stature to find a personal workaround rather than a systemic fix that would work for everyone. To spend so much time on such a trivial matter would be absurd in a city council race, much less a presidential election. To do so in circumstances when it advances the electoral prospects of a rival who has shattered all precedents in terms of lacking transparency or basic honesty is infinitely more scandalous than anything related to the server itself.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit
It must suck to get aborted so close to your goal, huh?

Guest


Guest

Pkr  has already posted the laws she broke. Comey is now doing what he should have done to begin with. Your candidate brought it all on herself with her narcissistic behavior. Tough Titty said the kitty when the milk ran dry. Or as FT and viking broom rider say, eat it with a spoon

Sal

Sal

Tellthetruth wrote:Pkr  has already posted the laws she broke. Comey is now doing what he should have done to begin with. Your candidate brought it all on herself with her narcissistic behavior. Tough Titty said the kitty when the milk ran dry. Or as FT and viking broom rider say, eat it with a spoon

Hahahaha ....

.... another non-reader.

I bet if you asked real nice you could get a fifth grader to explain it to you.

2seaoat



Pkr has already posted the laws she broke. Comey is now doing what he should have done to begin with. Your candidate brought it all on herself with her narcissistic behavior. Tough Titty said the kitty when the milk ran dry. Or as FT and viking broom rider say, eat it with a spoon


No, PK did not. He has no idea what the law is and cuts and paste nonsense. A month ago he was arguing complete and utter nonsense that gross negligence under the statute will meet one of the elements. This was because people are stupid. You see the propagandist fully knowing that a Supreme Court has struck down the gross negligence element in the statute almost 75 years ago, focused on the slow witted who gobble down propaganda and have no educated background in the subject area. Hillary Clinton broke no law. As absurd as the argument that President Obama was born in Kenya four years later we can laugh at the fools who posted on this forum the same. Now in four years, Hillary will be President, she will not be indicted of any crime, and we will laugh at the fools who did not understand the law. Pace you are a certified card carrying low IQ fool.

Guest


Guest

You're a conditioned leftist... perfectly content to exist in the margin between "gross negligence" and "extreme carelessness". Willing to set aside all common sense and the ethics of fair play and justice for all. Congratulations comrade.

2seaoat



You bet I am. Let me give you an example of your sophomoric logic. The world champion Cubs have a kid from Pace who is a rising star. He made an error throwing over the first baseman's head. It was negligence and he hurried his throw. Now some people who have a kid who plays for the Wahoos in Pensacola start a smear campaign that the Kid from Pace intentionally threw the ball over the head because he has ties to people who were betting large sums of money against the cubs. They want him charged with a crime, and they want their kid to be given a shot at the position. The problem is that the Wahoo player is batting 200 and has thirty errors this year. He has been accused of sexual assault 9 times, and he has been found to be scalping tickets to the wahoo games.

So the FBI looks into the allegations of a crime, and they simply state that the kid was negligent, but they could not find any evidence of the kid trying to throw the game, and he was honest with them in their interviews. Somebody comes on the forum and starts ranting incoherently about how the game of baseball has been demeaned because of the ethics of the allstar Cub and his crimes. Some people try to point out that he committed no crime, and they continue to spew the propaganda put out by the family of the Wahoo player.

Do not see your behavior do you. Baier from Fox just apologized for on the air saying the FBI was about to indict Hillary for the Clinton Foundation where he was fed false propaganda......oh and you are not bothered a bit that Rudy knew two full days before the director released the FBI memo......no PK.....move on....you will NEVER see Hillary Clinton indicted and yes.....President Obama was born in America......and the kid in pace will do a splendid job over his career with more hits than negligent mistakes......you see that is why the choice is so easy......Hillary is an allstar.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

You are just making the sea-lawyers mad with your analogies, Seaoat.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:.... is that a bullshit story has dominated the campaign.

Read the whole thing.

It's a very good primer for Markle, PkrBum, and PeeDawg who obviously don't have a grasp of the issues.


Network newscasts have, remarkably, dedicated more airtime to coverage of Clinton’s emails than to all policy issues combined.

Cable news has been, if anything, worse, and many prestige outlets have joined the pileup. One malign result of obsessive email coverage is that the public is left totally unaware of the policy stakes in the election. Another is that the constant vague recitations of the phrase ‘‘Clinton email scandal’’ have firmly implanted the notion that there is something scandalous about anything involving Hillary Clinton an email, including her campaign manager getting hacked or the revelation that one of her aides sometimes checked mail on her husband’s computer.

But none of this is true. Clinton broke no laws according to the FBI itself. Her setup gave her no power to evade federal transparency laws beyond what anyone who has a personal email account of any kind has. Her stated explanation for her conduct is entirely believable, fits the facts perfectly, and is entirely plausible to anyone who doesn't simply start with the assumption that she's guilty of something.

Given Powell’s conduct, Clinton wasn't even breaking with an informal precedent. The very worst you can say is that, faced with an annoying government IT policy, she used her stature to find a personal workaround rather than a systemic fix that would work for everyone. To spend so much time on such a trivial matter would be absurd in a city council race, much less a presidential election. To do so in circumstances when it advances the electoral prospects of a rival who has shattered all precedents in terms of lacking transparency or basic honesty is infinitely more scandalous than anything related to the server itself.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit

Clinton's Real Email Scandal .... LOL_zpsrc5py0ql

Telstar

Telstar

Markle wrote:
Sal wrote:.... is that a bullshit story has dominated the campaign.

Read the whole thing.

It's a very good primer for Markle, PkrBum, and PeeDawg who obviously don't have a grasp of the issues.


Network newscasts have, remarkably, dedicated more airtime to coverage of Clinton’s emails than to all policy issues combined.

Cable news has been, if anything, worse, and many prestige outlets have joined the pileup. One malign result of obsessive email coverage is that the public is left totally unaware of the policy stakes in the election. Another is that the constant vague recitations of the phrase ‘‘Clinton email scandal’’ have firmly implanted the notion that there is something scandalous about anything involving Hillary Clinton an email, including her campaign manager getting hacked or the revelation that one of her aides sometimes checked mail on her husband’s computer.

But none of this is true. Clinton broke no laws according to the FBI itself. Her setup gave her no power to evade federal transparency laws beyond what anyone who has a personal email account of any kind has. Her stated explanation for her conduct is entirely believable, fits the facts perfectly, and is entirely plausible to anyone who doesn't simply start with the assumption that she's guilty of something.

Given Powell’s conduct, Clinton wasn't even breaking with an informal precedent. The very worst you can say is that, faced with an annoying government IT policy, she used her stature to find a personal workaround rather than a systemic fix that would work for everyone. To spend so much time on such a trivial matter would be absurd in a city council race, much less a presidential election. To do so in circumstances when it advances the electoral prospects of a rival who has shattered all precedents in terms of lacking transparency or basic honesty is infinitely more scandalous than anything related to the server itself.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit

Clinton's Real Email Scandal .... LOL_zpsrc5py0ql




Clinton's Real Email Scandal .... Fear910

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum