Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » OPINION, What Mark Levin had to say about Donald Trump and the SC debate

OPINION, What Mark Levin had to say about Donald Trump and the SC debate

5 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Markle

Markle

OPINION, What Mark Levin had to say about Donald Trump and the SC debate

Thank God for Mark Levin.

Tania and I are in Boston for a few days on business. I have been itching to get behind the mic since the debate on Saturday.

Mark has just said it all.

I have waited for fox, and everyone else to actually express my feelings on The 9-11 Truther Donald Trump. They all shielded him as the ratings are too intoxicating.

My wait was over tonight when Mark came screaming out of the gate! Thank God for a man with integrity.

Any of you TrumpBots that excuse Trump for saying that GWBush was responsible for 9-11 and the World Trade Center coming down - go hang out with Code Pink.

Look at what you have become.

Look what you are willing to accept.

Bush may be many things but responsible for 9.11 is not one of them. Lying to get us into war is another thing he didn't do.

I can get this crap from Bill Ayers.

If you want to cement that lie into the history books, go ahead, elect a republican that believes it. Or, even worse, just says it when it is to his advantage.

While we are at it, why doesn't "Mr. I have the balls to say what ever I want" give us the "steel doesn't melt" speech. Then maybe he can talk about his evidence that Barack's birth certificate was fake.

He had experts. Does he have the Canadian experts now too?
Shameful.

As are any of the decent Americans that know the truth about 9.11 and are excusing these lies just because they are angry and want to win.

Mark Levin is right. Trump owes Bush, the military, gold star families and the rest of America an apology.

You will never hear it, because remember he has NEVER 'done anything that requires asking for forgiveness".

He is deeply disturbed, filled with rage and if you want a Truther as president elect Michael Moore. Moore is celebrity loudmouth too, but at least he isn't ours.

Normally, I would delete this as it was written in anger. But in rereading it there is nothing that I feel is over the line or name calling.

It is not name calling if it is true.

Donald Trump is by definition a loud mouth.

He is a celebrity, at least in the same way Bob Barker or Monte Hall was a celebrity. They were all game show hosts.

He is a birther and a Truther.

He is full of rage. Watch Saturday's debate and watch the spittle comes flying out of his mouth as he screams at Jeb.

Tell me there isn't some sort of psychological disturbance going on. He asks like an 8 year old at times. Again watch the debate when Jeb said: "we all need to act like adults" only to have Trump respond as my 10 year old used to when he was 8:

"Oh, like you are the adult". Don't believe me. Watch the debate.
He has said he has never done anything he felt he needed to ask forgiveness for. The only man I know of in history like that was Jesus, and he is not Jesus.

He does say the same thing that code pink says.

I stand by the facts. Did I miss any?

He tosses the word liar about so much it is meaningless.

Maybe he is self diagnosing.

My prediction is that by July you will see the full rage come out. His arrogance will undoing and if it isn't his, it will be our undoing.

The finance minister of Greece just came out and said he has seen this kind before. "1930's Germany."

His words not mine.

Maybe he would know as the Golden dawn party (modern day Nazis) have sprouted up in Greece because the people there "were angry."

You never make a good decision when you are angry.
Btw: if you are angry now ask yourself why? Do you believe the Truthers are right?

If not why are you excusing and protecting this? Remember how despicable you thought it was when code pink said these same things?

Somewhere Susan Surranden and Barbara Streisand are cheering.

Thank you Mark for being brave. I know the security risk you have just taken.

http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-goes-nuclear-over-donald-trumps-debate-comments-audio/#disqus_thread

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:OPINION, What Mark Levin had to say about Donald Trump and the SC debate

Thank God for Mark Levin.

Tania and I are in Boston for a few days on business. I have been itching to get behind the mic since the debate on Saturday.

Mark has just said it all.

I have waited for fox, and everyone else to actually express my feelings on The 9-11 Truther Donald Trump. They all shielded him as the ratings are too intoxicating.

My wait was over tonight when Mark came screaming out of the gate! Thank God for a man with integrity.

Any of you TrumpBots that excuse Trump for saying that GWBush was responsible for 9-11 and the World Trade Center coming down - go hang out with Code Pink.

Look at what you have become.

Look what you are willing to accept.

Bush may be many things but responsible for 9.11 is not one of them. Lying to get us into war is another thing he didn't do.

I can get this crap from Bill Ayers.

If you want to cement that lie into the history books, go ahead, elect a republican that believes it. Or, even worse, just says it when it is to his advantage.

While we are at it, why doesn't "Mr. I have the balls to say what ever I want" give us the "steel doesn't melt" speech. Then maybe he can talk about his evidence that Barack's birth certificate was fake.

He had experts. Does he have the Canadian experts now too?
Shameful.

As are any of the decent Americans that know the truth about 9.11 and are excusing these lies just because they are angry and want to win.

Mark Levin is right. Trump owes Bush, the military, gold star families and the rest of America an apology.

You will never hear it, because remember he has NEVER 'done anything that requires asking for forgiveness".

He is deeply disturbed, filled with rage and if you want a Truther as president elect Michael Moore. Moore is celebrity loudmouth too, but at least he isn't ours.

Normally, I would delete this as it was written in anger. But in rereading it there is nothing that I feel is over the line or name calling.

It is not name calling if it is true.

Donald Trump is by definition a loud mouth.

He is a celebrity, at least in the same way Bob Barker or Monte Hall was a celebrity. They were all game show hosts.

He is a birther and a Truther.

He is full of rage. Watch Saturday's debate and watch the spittle comes flying out of his mouth as he screams at Jeb.

Tell me there isn't some sort of psychological disturbance going on. He asks like an 8 year old at times. Again watch the debate when Jeb said: "we all need to act like adults" only to have Trump respond as my 10 year old used to when he was 8:

"Oh, like you are the adult". Don't believe me. Watch the debate.
He has said he has never done anything he felt he needed to ask forgiveness for. The only man I know of in history like that was Jesus, and he is not Jesus.

He does say the same thing that code pink says.

I stand by the facts. Did I miss any?

He tosses the word liar about so much it is meaningless.

Maybe he is self diagnosing.

My prediction is that by July you will see the full rage come out. His arrogance will undoing and if it isn't his, it will be our undoing.

The finance minister of Greece just came out and said he has seen this kind before. "1930's Germany."

His words not mine.

Maybe he would know as the Golden dawn party (modern day Nazis) have sprouted up in Greece because the people there "were angry."

You never make a good decision when you are angry.
Btw: if you are angry now ask yourself why? Do you believe the Truthers are right?

If not why are you excusing and protecting this? Remember how despicable you thought it was when code pink said these same things?

Somewhere Susan Surranden and Barbara Streisand are cheering.

Thank you Mark for being brave. I know the security risk you have just taken.

http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-goes-nuclear-over-donald-trumps-debate-comments-audio/#disqus_thread

Who the fuck is Mark Levin and why should we care? Does he work for Breitbart? Hannity? Limbaugh?

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob


Who the fuck is Mark Levin and why should we care?  Does he work for Breitbart?  Hannity?  Limbaugh?

He's a radio talk host who has a larger audience than Howard Stern.  And he's a Constitutional lawyer like Obama. 

http://www.talkers.com/heavy-hundred/

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Bob wrote:

Who the fuck is Mark Levin and why should we care?  Does he work for Breitbart?  Hannity?  Limbaugh?

He's a radio talk host who has a larger audience than Howard Stern.  And he's a Constitutional lawyer like Obama. 

http://www.talkers.com/heavy-hundred/


Plus a stalwart Dubya supporter -- which says it ALL!

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

We now have a poll taken after the debate and after Trump had made the comments about the Iraq War and Bush.
That poll has him far ahead of Cruz in SC.  So what does that tell us?

Here's what I think.  I think all the pundits and politicians got it wrong.
They all said Bush was so popular in South Carolina that this would badly hurt Trump.
This latest poll reveals that Bush and the Iraq War are actually not as popular as they thought,  even in South Carolina.

Once again,  Trump continues to challenge ALL the accepted thinking about Presidential politics and comes out the winner. 
But what I REALLY think he's done with this is to start the general election campaign.  He knows Bush and the Iraq War are not popular amongst the lion's share of the general election voters and he's already trying to win them over at the same time he's vying for the nomination.
He's a political genius.

Guest


Guest

He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-goes-nuclear-over-donald-trumps-debate-comments-audio/#disqus_thread

OPINION, What Mark Levin had to say about Donald Trump and the SC debate N1crh

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

Wrong Mob Rule. What it all means is that the knuckledragging tea partier republican base has finally reached the same conclusion as we leftists: Bush lied us into a terrible and meaningless war. Reality.

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

Wrong Mob Rule. What it all means is that the knuckledragging tea partier republican base has finally reached the same conclusion as we leftists: Bush lied us into a terrible and meaningless war. Reality.

Wow... you've read again all of the leadership in the late nineties mirroring the intelligence that bush2 used... but come to that same talkingpoint. I don't think there's any ground for us to gap how far indoctrinated you are comrade.

Your vitriol towards the tea party is just another tell. A group that respected the law and peaceably assembled you condemn. But groups that were destructive you support. Just admit that there are no rules to your agenda. Stand up comrade.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

No actually I think Trump has done something that no one else has been able to do. 
He's challenged this whole hangup with ideology.  He recognizes that a growing number of us are sick and tired of the ideology and the labels.  He doesn't give  a shit about being "conservative" or "liberal" or "progressive" or "libertarian" or any of that nonsense.  What he's about is pragmatism.  That's how he did business and that's how he does politics.  And unfortunately for the sean hannitys and the rachel maddows,  and for the republican and democrat "establishment" types (whatever that is),  his disregard for ideology is gaining a following.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

Wrong Mob Rule.  What it all means is that the knuckledragging tea partier republican base has finally reached the same conclusion as we leftists:  Bush lied us into a terrible and meaningless war.  Reality.

Wow... you've read again all of the leadership in the late nineties mirroring the intelligence that bush2 used... but come to that same talkingpoint. I don't think there's any ground for us to gap how far indoctrinated you are comrade.

Your vitriol towards the tea party is just another tell. A group that respected the law and peaceably assembled you condemn. But groups that were destructive you support. Just admit that there are no rules to your agenda. Stand up comrade.

Fact: All the intel released to congress was cleared by Cheney and Dubya. Reports -- and there were several -- which claimed there was no evidence of nuclear development or WMD development, were controlled by the White House.

Also, it's anything but unusual for even senators and representatives from a president's opposing party to approve any war request.

The most important factor, though, is that it was Bush who drove the program of lies designed to gain the approval he wanted.

You want me to spread the blame -- and I do, actually. I think anyone who voted for the war on Iraq should be ejected from government service. This afternoon. Regardless of party.

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

Wrong Mob Rule.  What it all means is that the knuckledragging tea partier republican base has finally reached the same conclusion as we leftists:  Bush lied us into a terrible and meaningless war.  Reality.

Wow... you've read again all of the leadership in the late nineties mirroring the intelligence that bush2 used... but come to that same talkingpoint. I don't think there's any ground for us to gap how far indoctrinated you are comrade.

Your vitriol towards the tea party is just another tell. A group that respected the law and peaceably assembled you condemn. But groups that were destructive you support. Just admit that there are no rules to your agenda. Stand up comrade.

Fact: All the intel released to congress was cleared by Cheney and Dubya. Reports -- and there were several -- which claimed there was no evidence of nuclear development or WMD development, were controlled by the White House.

Also, it's anything but unusual for even senators and representatives from a president's opposing party to approve any war request.

The most important factor, though, is that it was Bush who drove the program of lies designed to gain the approval he wanted.

You want me to spread the blame -- and I do, actually. I think anyone who voted for the war on Iraq should be ejected from government service. This afternoon. Regardless of party.

It's the same intelligence... the same descriptions from politicians... years from either 9/11 or the bush rationales.

Don't forget... I have always been completely against any of our interventions. I condemn the iraq campaign.

But that doesn't change the events then and the context... unless you are an ideologue.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

Wrong Mob Rule.  What it all means is that the knuckledragging tea partier republican base has finally reached the same conclusion as we leftists:  Bush lied us into a terrible and meaningless war.  Reality.

Wow... you've read again all of the leadership in the late nineties mirroring the intelligence that bush2 used... but come to that same talkingpoint. I don't think there's any ground for us to gap how far indoctrinated you are comrade.

Your vitriol towards the tea party is just another tell. A group that respected the law and peaceably assembled you condemn. But groups that were destructive you support. Just admit that there are no rules to your agenda. Stand up comrade.

Fact:  All the intel released to congress was cleared by Cheney and Dubya.  Reports -- and there were several -- which claimed there was no evidence of nuclear development or WMD development, were controlled by the White House.

Also, it's anything but unusual for even senators and representatives from a president's opposing party to approve any war request.

The most important factor, though, is that it was Bush who drove the program of lies designed to gain the approval he wanted.  

You want me to spread the blame -- and I do, actually.  I think anyone who voted for the war on Iraq should be ejected from government service.  This afternoon.  Regardless of party.  

It's the same intelligence... the same descriptions from politicians... years from either 9/11 or the bush rationales. Bullshit. The white house kept back all the reports that countered the lies they wanted to sell.

Don't forget... I have always been completely against any of our interventions. I condemn the iraq campaign.

But that doesn't change the events then and the context... unless you are an ideologue.

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

Wrong Mob Rule.  What it all means is that the knuckledragging tea partier republican base has finally reached the same conclusion as we leftists:  Bush lied us into a terrible and meaningless war.  Reality.

Wow... you've read again all of the leadership in the late nineties mirroring the intelligence that bush2 used... but come to that same talkingpoint. I don't think there's any ground for us to gap how far indoctrinated you are comrade.

Your vitriol towards the tea party is just another tell. A group that respected the law and peaceably assembled you condemn. But groups that were destructive you support. Just admit that there are no rules to your agenda. Stand up comrade.

Fact:  All the intel released to congress was cleared by Cheney and Dubya.  Reports -- and there were several -- which claimed there was no evidence of nuclear development or WMD development, were controlled by the White House.

Also, it's anything but unusual for even senators and representatives from a president's opposing party to approve any war request.

The most important factor, though, is that it was Bush who drove the program of lies designed to gain the approval he wanted.  

You want me to spread the blame -- and I do, actually.  I think anyone who voted for the war on Iraq should be ejected from government service.  This afternoon.  Regardless of party.  

It's the same intelligence... the same descriptions from politicians... years from either 9/11 or the bush rationales. Bullshit. The white house kept back all the reports that countered the lies they wanted to sell.

Don't forget... I have always been completely against any of our interventions. I condemn the iraq campaign.

But that doesn't change the events then and the context... unless you are an ideologue.

Then how do you explain the quotes from clinton and gore and dodd... etc... using the same exact talkingpoints?

That was 1998 and lead as a timeline into hillary et al making the same statements before the invasion.

Why can't you be objective and fair? I can only surmise conditioning.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I'll tell you how politically effective Trump's stand against Bush and his war will be.

I had decided Trump wasn't for me.  But because of this, I'm now leaning towards Trump again.   And I doubt I'm the only one.  lol

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Trump's got the usual suspects' heads spinning with this.
Ann Coulter was just on Hardball (Chris Matthews).

In case you don't know,  Coulter is still 100% in favor of invading Iraq and always was.

But she's also now a big Trump supporter and she says "Americans are sick of being dragged into these wars in the middle east.  That 'hellhole' will never have democracy and we don't need to be there.  We need to be here fixing our own country like Trump says".

roflmao

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:OPINION, What Mark Levin had to say about Donald Trump and the SC debate

Thank God for Mark Levin.

Tania and I are in Boston for a few days on business. I have been itching to get behind the mic since the debate on Saturday.

Mark has just said it all.

I have waited for fox, and everyone else to actually express my feelings on The 9-11 Truther Donald Trump. They all shielded him as the ratings are too intoxicating.

My wait was over tonight when Mark came screaming out of the gate! Thank God for a man with integrity.

Any of you TrumpBots that excuse Trump for saying that GWBush was responsible for 9-11 and the World Trade Center coming down - go hang out with Code Pink.

Look at what you have become.

Look what you are willing to accept.

Bush may be many things but responsible for 9.11 is not one of them. Lying to get us into war is another thing he didn't do.

I can get this crap from Bill Ayers.

If you want to cement that lie into the history books, go ahead, elect a republican that believes it. Or, even worse, just says it when it is to his advantage.

While we are at it, why doesn't "Mr. I have the balls to say what ever I want" give us the "steel doesn't melt" speech. Then maybe he can talk about his evidence that Barack's birth certificate was fake.

He had experts. Does he have the Canadian experts now too?
Shameful.

As are any of the decent Americans that know the truth about 9.11 and are excusing these lies just because they are angry and want to win.

Mark Levin is right. Trump owes Bush, the military, gold star families and the rest of America an apology.

You will never hear it, because remember he has NEVER 'done anything that requires asking for forgiveness".

He is deeply disturbed, filled with rage and if you want a Truther as president elect Michael Moore. Moore is celebrity loudmouth too, but at least he isn't ours.

Normally, I would delete this as it was written in anger. But in rereading it there is nothing that I feel is over the line or name calling.

It is not name calling if it is true.

Donald Trump is by definition a loud mouth.

He is a celebrity, at least in the same way Bob Barker or Monte Hall was a celebrity. They were all game show hosts.

He is a birther and a Truther.

He is full of rage. Watch Saturday's debate and watch the spittle comes flying out of his mouth as he screams at Jeb.

Tell me there isn't some sort of psychological disturbance going on. He asks like an 8 year old at times. Again watch the debate when Jeb said: "we all need to act like adults" only to have Trump respond as my 10 year old used to when he was 8:

"Oh, like you are the adult". Don't believe me. Watch the debate.
He has said he has never done anything he felt he needed to ask forgiveness for. The only man I know of in history like that was Jesus, and he is not Jesus.

He does say the same thing that code pink says.

I stand by the facts. Did I miss any?

He tosses the word liar about so much it is meaningless.

Maybe he is self diagnosing.

My prediction is that by July you will see the full rage come out. His arrogance will undoing and if it isn't his, it will be our undoing.

The finance minister of Greece just came out and said he has seen this kind before. "1930's Germany."

His words not mine.

Maybe he would know as the Golden dawn party (modern day Nazis) have sprouted up in Greece because the people there "were angry."

You never make a good decision when you are angry.
Btw: if you are angry now ask yourself why? Do you believe the Truthers are right?

If not why are you excusing and protecting this? Remember how despicable you thought it was when code pink said these same things?

Somewhere Susan Surranden and Barbara Streisand are cheering.

Thank you Mark for being brave. I know the security risk you have just taken.

http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-goes-nuclear-over-donald-trumps-debate-comments-audio/#disqus_thread

Who the fuck is Mark Levin and why should we care?  Does he work for Breitbart?  Hannity?  Limbaugh?

Sad isn't it? That we have so many uninformed, ignorant Progressives here among so few people.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
PkrBum wrote:He's basically just brought leftist tactics into conservative politics. The new rules are that there are no rules.

Wrong Mob Rule.  What it all means is that the knuckledragging tea partier republican base has finally reached the same conclusion as we leftists:  Bush lied us into a terrible and meaningless war.  Reality.

Wow... you've read again all of the leadership in the late nineties mirroring the intelligence that bush2 used... but come to that same talkingpoint. I don't think there's any ground for us to gap how far indoctrinated you are comrade.

Your vitriol towards the tea party is just another tell. A group that respected the law and peaceably assembled you condemn. But groups that were destructive you support. Just admit that there are no rules to your agenda. Stand up comrade.

Fact:  All the intel released to congress was cleared by Cheney and Dubya.  Reports -- and there were several -- which claimed there was no evidence of nuclear development or WMD development, were controlled by the White House.

Also, it's anything but unusual for even senators and representatives from a president's opposing party to approve any war request.

The most important factor, though, is that it was Bush who drove the program of lies designed to gain the approval he wanted.  

You want me to spread the blame -- and I do, actually.  I think anyone who voted for the war on Iraq should be ejected from government service.  This afternoon.  Regardless of party.  

FACTS: Again for the slow....
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”
- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cwqh4wQPoQk&feature=related

He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.
- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."
- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.

Guest


Guest

He can't handle the truth... it runs contrary to his conditioning.

It's as if they didn't live through the nineties. Why do such common things during those times need to be said?

Markle

Markle

PkrBum wrote:He can't handle the truth... it runs contrary to his conditioning.

It's as if they didn't live through the nineties. Why do such common things during those times need to be said?

My good friend Socialist/Communist Wordslinger is accustomed to getting his own way. Anyone who disagrees with him in his circle, he simply browbeats into a false submission. Finally they just say yeah, yeah, yeah, whatever and go on their way shaking their head.

Wordslingers hopes and dreams of all the Socialist Programs Lame Duck President Obama was going to activate, like Obamacare, and President Obama's plans for GITMO, the Middle East and the rest, (remember the massive failure of "Cash for Junkers") have failed, and not in a small way but on a massive scale.

So here in 2016, all he has left is to go back to 2008 and wildly fuss and fume. Sad really.

Sal

Sal

Bob wrote:
He's a political genius.

He's a charlatan who appeals to idiots.

Sal

Sal

Bob wrote:I'll tell you how politically effective Trump's stand against Bush and his war will be.

I had decided Trump wasn't for me.  But because of this, I'm now leaning towards Trump again.   And I doubt I'm the only one.  lol

Like I said, ..."idiots".

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Trump is satan and anyone who doesn't see that is a retarded idiot.

Hillary and Bernie were sent down from the Lord to do good deeds.

Got it.  lol

Sal

Sal

Bob wrote:Trump is satan and anyone who doesn't see that is a retarded idiot.

Hillary and Bernie were sent down from the Lord to do good deeds.

Got it.  lol

No, you don't get it.

It's more like this ...

Trump is a charlatan who appeals to idiots.

Hillary is a deeply flawed candidate, but probably the most qualified to be president.

Bernie has the vision for this country that most closely aligns with mine, but I remain unconvinced he's electable.

I know you think everything is as black and white as you describe, but that's because you're an idiot.

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

Trump is an idiot and I'm an idiot and you're a genius.

Got it.  lol

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » OPINION, What Mark Levin had to say about Donald Trump and the SC debate

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum