The bridge is bankrupt. It filed bankruptcy and discharged third party obligations, yet the bondholders are still in control and figured after discharging their obligations they could simply make it so expensive that government would come in and give some relief.
The answer is simple. The state under their obligation to manage and maintain the bridge declare that the deferred maintenance has made the bridge untenable, and have the state close the bridge through a court declaratory judgment, and have the state offer the bondholders ten cents on the dollar. If the bondholders deny it then the state gets the cost to demolish the bridge and tries to get a judgment against the bondholders now for the demolishing of the bridge under the theory of intentional dissipation of assets by their positions historically on tolls. The state takes over the bridge for a payout of say ten million, and recoups the same with a dollar toll.
When I was running my dump truck from Garcon to Navarre every day I was saving about three gallons of gas a day which was about ten dollars and the two tolls then were only six dollars, so I was saving four dollars a day with the bridge. At two dollars a day, I would be saving today $5.50 a day......the bridge would see a ten fold increase in traffic and the state would recoup its money. Go to court State.