Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Gowdy Threatens to Subpoena Hillary's Private Emails

+3
Markle
KarlRove
Sal
7 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Sal

Sal

Gowdy Threatens to Subpoena Hillary's Private Emails 1359589833-1359568675-gomer15

This should be good ....

WASHINGTON (CNN) —The House Committee investigating the attacks in Benghazi formally requested that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hand over her private email server to the independent inspector general for the State Department, or to another neutral third party.

In a letter sent Friday to Clinton's lawyer and obtained by CNN, committee Chairman Trey Gowdy gave Clinton until April 3 to respond to the request or risk having the issue taken up by the full House of Representatives, which could vote to subpoena the server.

http://www.wdsu.com/politics/house-panel-requests-clintons-private-emails/31920408

KarlRove

KarlRove

Good

Sal

Sal

KarlRove wrote:Good

Do you know who would be tasked with enforcing a subpoena, PeeDawg?

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... pass the popcorn, please.

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:Gowdy Threatens to Subpoena Hillary's Private Emails 1359589833-1359568675-gomer15

This should be good ....

WASHINGTON (CNN) —The House Committee investigating the attacks in Benghazi formally requested that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hand over her private email server to the independent inspector general for the State Department, or to another neutral third party.

In a letter sent Friday to Clinton's lawyer and obtained by CNN, committee Chairman Trey Gowdy gave Clinton until April 3 to respond to the request or risk having the issue taken up by the full House of Representatives, which could vote to subpoena the server.

http://www.wdsu.com/politics/house-panel-requests-clintons-private-emails/31920408

Looks much more like Hillary Clinton after hearing that Congress is demanding the SERVER.

Although Jim Nabors did have an incredible voice.


Benghazi panel chairman to Hillary: Give us the email server — or else

REP. TREY GOWDY — the chairman of the congressional committee probing the Benghazi terror attacks — formally asks that Hillary Clinton turn over her personal server for review, warning that if Clinton won't comply, he will tell House Speaker John Boehner so he can use the 'full powers' of the House to take the 'necessary steps.'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/20/benghazi-panel-head-gowdy-asks-clinton-to-relinquish-personal-server/?intcmp=latestnews



Last edited by Markle on 3/20/2015, 6:46 pm; edited 1 time in total

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Gowdy Threatens to Subpoena Hillary's Private Emails Gowdy_10

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:
KarlRove wrote:Good

Do you know who would be tasked with enforcing a subpoena, PeeDawg?

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... pass the popcorn, please.

Yes, please tell us exactly who is going to refuse to serve a subpoena from the United State Congress!

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Gowdy Threatens to Subpoena Hillary's Private Emails Gowdy_10

Why are you so afraid of the truth?

KarlRove

KarlRove

They are ... The
Chance for their queen to be POTUS is disappearing

Sal

Sal

Markle wrote:
Sal wrote:
KarlRove wrote:Good

Do you know who would be tasked with enforcing a subpoena, PeeDawg?

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... pass the popcorn, please.

Yes, please tell us exactly who is going to refuse to serve a subpoena from the United State Congress!

You don't know, do you?

Hahahahahahahahaha ...

... this is gonna be fun.

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:
Markle wrote:
Sal wrote:
KarlRove wrote:Good

Do you know who would be tasked with enforcing a subpoena, PeeDawg?

Hahahahahahahahahaha ...

... pass the popcorn, please.

Yes, please tell us exactly who is going to refuse to serve a subpoena from the United State Congress!

You don't know, do you?

Hahahahahahahahaha ...

... this is gonna be fun.

Knew you were afraid!

knothead

knothead

No one here is afraid . . . . we are enjoying the antics of your bad hair cut investigator . . . . it is both fun and excruciating to watch the GOP wallow in their power all the while displaying their continued inability to govern. Comical is a gross understatement . . . .

Sal

Sal

PeeDawg and Markie don't know it, but it'll be Eric Holder's task to enforce the subpoena, because ....

.... wait for it ....

.... they won't confirm Lynch!!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

knothead wrote:No one here is afraid . . . . we are enjoying the antics of your bad hair cut investigator . . . . it is both fun and excruciating to watch the GOP wallow in their power all the while displaying their continued inability to govern.  Comical is a gross understatement . . . .

The 2016 election season will certainly be a lot of fun here on the forum. I expect we will see the same fulminations from the same posters. Their stripes will not have changed.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

knothead wrote:No one here is afraid . . . . we are enjoying the antics of your bad hair cut investigator . . . . it is both fun and excruciating to watch the GOP wallow in their power all the while displaying their continued inability to govern.  Comical is a gross understatement . . . .

Alphabet salad...but no response.

Keep up the good work!

Markle

Markle

Still no response....how shocking.

Please tell us exactly who is going to refuse to serve a subpoena from the United State Congress!

Sal

Sal

Markle wrote:Still no response....how shocking.

Please tell us exactly who is going to refuse to serve a subpoena from the United State Congress!

Eric Holder.

Get it now, asshat?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!

2seaoat



Alphabet salad...but no response.

Keep up the good work!

Let me help you. First, two members of the administration are currently in contempt of Congress.....Lerner and the AG. Congress can serve their own subpoena. It is pretty simple to meet the criteria for a valid Congressional Subpoena. I even think they can meet all three tests for the legitimacy of the issuance of the subpoena, but it has been almost 75 years since the inherent contempt process has resulted in a person actually being jailed by Congress. This happened after being served, they tore up the documents. Hillary prior to actually getting the subpoena only needs her legal counsel to tell her she may clean her hard drive because she has complied with the law by turning over the paper copies of email which were government records . The subpoena is served and she will deliver her server with legal counsel explaining their legal position on cleaning the drive because this is a political investigation and she has NO duty under the law to turn over her personal emails . Hillary gets up and says on advice of counsel I have cleaned my personal emails from my server, and I complied and turned over the server pursuant to the subpoena.

What ya going to do.......say she is lying.....no....she is following the advice of counsel. She will not face ANY consequences......None.......or she could just turn it over and have people releasing her personal emails eg. Sony to accomplish the politcal goal of these repeated investigations. Either way she is in entire control.

2seaoat



Surprisingly the courts have historically stayed clear of these political questions. Gomer is dumb enough to threaten folks with jail.......lets see.....my political opponent leads in all the polls and we want her personal emails.....when she does not turn them over.......somebody thinks they will jail her.......stupid cannot be handicapped. He thinks he is in an Article III court.

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:
Markle wrote:Still no response....how shocking.

Please tell us exactly who is going to refuse to serve a subpoena from the United State Congress!

Eric Holder.

Get it now, asshat?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!

Why do feel the need to call others names?

Why do you think it is funny that lame duck Eric Holder would refuse to serve a subpoena?

Why would Eric Holder risk being held in contempt of congress? Like his good friend, he hates the Clintons.



2seaoat



Why would Eric Holder risk being held in contempt of congress? Like his good friend, he hates the Clintons.



Drinking before five pm is never good form.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Alphabet salad...but no response.

Keep up the good work!

Let me help you.  First, two members of the administration are currently in contempt of Congress.....Lerner and the AG.   Congress can serve their own subpoena.  It is pretty simple to meet the criteria for a valid Congressional Subpoena.   I even think they can meet all three tests for the legitimacy of the issuance of the subpoena, but it has been almost 75 years since the inherent contempt process has resulted in a person actually being jailed by Congress.   This happened after being served, they tore up the documents.  Hillary prior to actually getting the subpoena only needs her legal counsel to tell her she may clean her hard drive because she has complied with the law by turning over the paper copies of email which were government records .   The subpoena is served and she will deliver her server with legal counsel explaining their legal position on cleaning the drive because this is a political investigation and she has NO duty under the law to turn over her personal emails .  Hillary gets up and says on advice of counsel I have cleaned my personal emails from my server, and I complied and turned over the server pursuant to the subpoena.

What ya going to do.......say she is lying.....no....she is following the advice of counsel.   She will not face ANY consequences......None.......or she could just turn it over and have people releasing her personal emails eg. Sony to accomplish the politcal goal of these repeated investigations.   Either way she is in entire control.

Isn't that what former President Richard M. Nixon said about his tapes? How did that work out?

Why do you leave out turning over the server to the FBI, have them analyze the server and release all of those containing any government business?

2seaoat



Isn't that what former President Richard M. Nixon said about his tapes? How did that work out?

Why do you leave out turning over the server to the FBI, have them analyze the server and release all of those containing any government business?


The taping system was set up by government, in a government building, for the purpose of recording government business. The Supreme Court was clear why it allowed this government recorder and tapes to be released pursuant to the subpoena, and later the courts clearly established the precedent that even personal information on a government taping system in a government building belongs to the President and his estate. Hillary Clinton did not have a government server, but a personal server. The server was not in a government building, but in her personal home. The server set up in her home was primarily for her personal use. She turned over pursuant to Regulations copies of any government business which was on her personal property. She complied with the regulations, and could wipe her hard drive any time she pleases.

As to your second argument which is to turn the server over to the FBI, that would usually be the decision of the judge who would be doing an in camera examination of the item subpoenaed to decide which forensic experts would be utilized to determine if there was business records still remaining on a personal server, however the precedent of SOS is well established by Colin Powell whose hard drive was cleaned and had no data to turn over to the State department.........not only personal information was wiped, but State department information was forever wiped.......and not one word from anybody that either his decision was unethical or a violation of the regualtions.....they were not........it was his personal server and if the government wants to control government emails there is a very simple solution. All government emails must utilize a government server, but in the absence of this law......not regulation, government information will be on personal servers and as such that information could be lost, intentionally or by accident, which makes personal server use a very poor government policy and one which should be changed.

Markle

Markle

Bottom Line

Kelly File

Republicans demand Hillary Clinton turn over her server

Published March 23, 2015
·FoxNews.com

http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2015/03/23/republicans-demand-hillary-clinton-turn-over-her-server/

2seaoat



Republicans demand

that is the funniest line.......the proper term should be whine. The whine is what somebody does when they are powerless. No legislation passed. No hope for the presidency. Nothing but serial whine committees where Gomer continues to cut the cheese.

Markle

Markle

She has government top secret, classified on her home server.

Even a former president who wishes to research in the national archive cannot remove anything from the facility. That's where all these records should have been two years ago.

You won't answer what you would do if it had been Dick Cheney who had classified, top secret information on a private server. Me, I'd be screaming bloody murder to have them released.

Of course, you would not.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum