Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying.

+4
Floridatexan
Markle
2seaoat
Wordslinger
8 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

It turns out the prosecutor's most effective witness in defense of Darryl Wilson who shot down unarmed Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., was nowhere near the shooting and the prosecutor knew it.

Darryl Wilson should be tried for murder.

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/4-things-should-happen-now-we-know-truth-about-witness-40-white-supremacist?page=0%2C1

Trying Wilson might help defuse the growing explosive conflict between the people and the police in Amerika Inc.

But such reasonableness is not part of the police MO. What they need, they believe 100% is to be feared by their enemies ... we the people.

And they're losing it. Brooklyn is just the first cop assassination. It surely won't be the last.

2seaoat



The prosecutor should lose their law license....to start with......

Guest


Guest

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTb7tE0Tv3Mnk-FlQ1vinnygk-uSzjOAIhE9ARFi4UaksMzcOim

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkD_kYkRk3c

Smile

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Damaged Eagle wrote:The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTb7tE0Tv3Mnk-FlQ1vinnygk-uSzjOAIhE9ARFi4UaksMzcOim

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkD_kYkRk3c

Smile

What in hell has Julie London's record got to do with the subject?

Guest


Guest

Wordslinger wrote:
Damaged Eagle wrote:

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkD_kYkRk3c

Smile

What in hell has Julie London's record got to do with the subject?

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTTgs9y5NGSFjR0w-Oj1-eh9z-aOVFVBwc9luRZp_GrVBQ3bWgW

Everything.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diOuUYcenW0

Smile

2seaoat



Nothing.....that is why he talks to himself.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:Nothing.....that is why he talks to himself.

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRnOpS2ot5J2nAKPDG6Pv18P0JhDS0HM088Pi2aFeLa6vCmQ2j3Gw

Is that the best you've got?

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA

Smile

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:It turns out the prosecutor's most effective witness in defense of Darryl Wilson who shot down unarmed Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., was nowhere near the shooting and the prosecutor knew it.  

Darryl Wilson should be tried for murder.

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/4-things-should-happen-now-we-know-truth-about-witness-40-white-supremacist?page=0%2C1

Trying Wilson might help defuse the growing explosive conflict between the people and the police in Amerika Inc.  

But such reasonableness is not part of the police MO.  What they need, they believe 100% is to be feared by their enemies ... we the people.

And they're losing it.  Brooklyn is just the first cop assassination.  It surely won't be the last.

Wordslinger is slinging it again from one of his beloved far left progressive sites which never allows the truth to get in way of their prejudice.

Poor Wordslinger's misinformation relies not on fact but on wishful thinking.  Numerous witnesses testified to the facts of the case, that Mr. Brown first ran from, then toward Darren Wilson.  Yes, there is evidence that one or more of the witnesses perjured themselves.  Their testimony was easily discounted by the Grand Jury as it aligned perfectly with the newspaper accounts which, in the end, proved false.

Do not forget that it was my good friend Wordslinger who repeatedly stated that Mr. Brown fell dead FIFTY FEET (50') from Darren Wilson.  That, as we all now know, was ANOTHER LIE perpetrated by our dear Wordslinger.

Why is Wordslinger so desperate to cause the collapse of this great country?

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. ClowardPiven

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/some-witnesses-lied-to-michael-brown-grand-jury-mcculloch-says/article_fd6effff-fc82-5df2-a248-cb93587847c7.html

2seaoat



to cause the collapse of this great country?


A bit over dramatic don't you think?

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote: to cause the collapse of this great country?


A bit over dramatic don't you think?

Not considering the goals of the far left Progressives here and in the administration.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


What does the fact that the prosecutor allowed a witness to testify that he knew was lying have to do with "the goals of progressives". You're really a sad little troll, aren't you, Markle?

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
What does the fact that the prosecutor allowed a witness to testify that he knew was lying have to do with "the goals of progressives".  You're really a sad little troll, aren't you, Markle?  

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1u0nO-KWA08Aq2RMXpXjLPD_3GJO2CQ69j02OUqgD1_uO0Nqp

Seems to me that quite a few witnesses perjured themselves when testifying. It was the job of the grand jury to determine falsehood and whether an indictment was necessary. They found that there was no need for an indictment.

Yet progressives like Wordslinger, Seaoat, Sal, Boards, and yourself, can't let it go. This in turn has lead to people like yourself screaming for blood and violence... or condoning those screams with your silence. Which is exactly what you got in the recent assassinations of two policemen in New York City.

The deaths of the two policemen who had nothing to do with the Brown or Garner incidents are on your heads.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cgh6V-kXnv4

Smile

My thoughts and prayers are with the two officers and families who died for no reason other than you relentless need to seek scapegoats and moral justification for your progressive beliefs.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Damaged Eagle wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
What does the fact that the prosecutor allowed a witness to testify that he knew was lying have to do with "the goals of progressives".  You're really a sad little troll, aren't you, Markle?  

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1u0nO-KWA08Aq2RMXpXjLPD_3GJO2CQ69j02OUqgD1_uO0Nqp

Seems to me that quite a few witnesses perjured themselves when testifying. It was the job of the grand jury to determine falsehood and whether an indictment was necessary. They found that there was no need for an indictment.

Yet progressives like Wordslinger, Seaoat, Sal, Boards, and yourself, can't let it go. This in turn has lead to people like yourself screaming for blood and violence... or condoning those screams with your silence. Which is exactly what you got in the recent assassinations of two policemen in New York City.

The deaths of the two policemen who had nothing to do with the Brown or Garner incidents are on your heads.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cgh6V-kXnv4

Smile

My thoughts and prayers are with the two officers and families who died for no reason other than you relentless need to seek scapegoats and moral justification for your progressive beliefs.


I can only speak for myself as a Progressive here, but thank you for according me and the others in this forum with the responsibility of the execution of the two NY cops. I never really understood the powers we evidently have.

And by the way, the thousands upon thousands of NY protestors who have flooded the streets of New York city the past few weeks, were made up of old people, young people, blacks and whites and browns. And I'd bet that not one of them ever read this forum's discussions.

It's interesting how you express such sorrow over the murder of these two cops, but have never expressed any concern whatever for the unarmed, blacks whose unnecessary deaths at the hands of violent cops were no less a murder.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:It turns out the prosecutor's most effective witness in defense of Darryl Wilson who shot down unarmed Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., was nowhere near the shooting and the prosecutor knew it.  

Darryl Wilson should be tried for murder.

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/4-things-should-happen-now-we-know-truth-about-witness-40-white-supremacist?page=0%2C1

Trying Wilson might help defuse the growing explosive conflict between the people and the police in Amerika Inc.  

But such reasonableness is not part of the police MO.  What they need, they believe 100% is to be feared by their enemies ... we the people.

And they're losing it.  Brooklyn is just the first cop assassination.  It surely won't be the last.

Wordslinger is slinging it again from one of his beloved far left progressive sites which never allows the truth to get in way of their prejudice.

Poor Wordslinger's misinformation relies not on fact but on wishful thinking.  Numerous witnesses testified to the facts of the case, that Mr. Brown first ran from, then toward Darren Wilson.  Yes, there is evidence that one or more of the witnesses perjured themselves.  Their testimony was easily discounted by the Grand Jury as it aligned perfectly with the newspaper accounts which, in the end, proved false.

Do not forget that it was my good friend Wordslinger who repeatedly stated that Mr. Brown fell dead FIFTY FEET (50') from Darren Wilson.  That, as we all now know, was ANOTHER LIE perpetrated by our dear Wordslinger.

Why is Wordslinger so desperate to cause the collapse of this great country?

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. ClowardPiven

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/some-witnesses-lied-to-michael-brown-grand-jury-mcculloch-says/article_fd6effff-fc82-5df2-a248-cb93587847c7.html


Strange but true: Until you brought up the names Cloward and Piven, I'd never heard of them. Reality.

But if you are accusing me of wanting to rip our government from the hands of the bloodsucking corporations who now own it lock, stock and barrel, you're absolutely correct!

Screw Amerika Inc.! Corporate control of our government through campaign financing.

nadalfan



Damaged Eagle wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
What does the fact that the prosecutor allowed a witness to testify that he knew was lying have to do with "the goals of progressives".  You're really a sad little troll, aren't you, Markle?  

The prosecutor at Ferguson knew witness 40, his best witness for Wilson's defense, was lying. Images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1u0nO-KWA08Aq2RMXpXjLPD_3GJO2CQ69j02OUqgD1_uO0Nqp

Seems to me that quite a few witnesses perjured themselves when testifying. It was the job of the grand jury to determine falsehood and whether an indictment was necessary. They found that there was no need for an indictment.

Yet progressives like Wordslinger, Seaoat, Sal, Boards, and yourself, can't let it go. This in turn has lead to people like yourself screaming for blood and violence... or condoning those screams with your silence. Which is exactly what you got in the recent assassinations of two policemen in New York City.

The deaths of the two policemen who had nothing to do with the Brown or Garner incidents are on your heads.

*****SMILE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cgh6V-kXnv4

Smile

My thoughts and prayers are with the two officers and families who died for no reason other than you relentless need to seek scapegoats and moral justification for your progressive beliefs.

No reasonable person has been screaming for blood and violence; people have been seeking justice. I would assume that is something everyone can get behind. The guy was a criminal with mental health issues, and although the murder of these two cops is brutal and senseless, it does not negate the need for reform in our police departments and justice system.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

The thousands of men, women and children of all colors who have been protesting from NY to Los Angeles over police brutality and a justice system designed to protect cops from prosecution were not out in the streets because of progressive propaganda.

They were protesting the state of police militarization and police brutality that now exists in America Inc. The events they are protesting were real, tragic, bloody acts by murderous cops. The people protesting include rich and poor, male and female, young and old.

From this forum's comments on these matters, it seems very clear that the conservatives here are pro-police and anti-citizen -- particularly if the victims of such deadly police-citizen confrontations are black.

Reality.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

Well we are all potential terrorists and terrorists fall into the category of people that have no rights and can be tortured and killed without any repercussions....America is now Fallujah


Excerpt :

Consider all that is acceptable today that was unheard of in civilized western society two hundred years ago.  Torture; armed government agents killing unarmed civilians with no fear of punishment or retribution; threats of war bordering on global Armageddon; sanctions and blockades causing mass starvations; money from nothing; the monitoring by the state of every single aspect of the lives of every single individual.

nadalfan



http://time.com/3643462/kareem-abdul-jabbar-nypd-shootings-police/

Abdul-Jabbar is a six-time NBA champion and league Most Valuable Player. He is also a celebrated author, filmmaker and education ambassador.

The way to honor those who defend our liberties with their lives — as did my father and grandfather — is not to curtail liberty, but to exercise it fully in pursuit of a just and peaceful society

The recent brutal murder of two Brooklyn police officers, Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu, is a national tragedy that should inspire nationwide mourning. Both my grandfather and father were police officers, so I appreciate what a difficult and dangerous profession law enforcement is. We need to value and celebrate the many officers dedicated to protecting the public and nourishing our justice system. It’s a job most of us don’t have the courage to do.

At the same time, however, we need to understand that their deaths are in no way related to the massive protests against systemic abuses of the justice system as symbolized by the recent deaths—also national tragedies—of Eric Garner, Akai Gurley, and Michael Brown. Ismaaiyl Brinsley, the suicidal killer, wasn’t an impassioned activist expressing political frustration, he was a troubled man who had shot his girlfriend earlier that same day. He even Instagrammed warnings of his violent intentions. None of this is the behavior of a sane man or rational activist. The protests are no more to blame for his actions than The Catcher in the Rye was for the murder of John Lennon or the movie Taxi Driver for the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan. Crazy has its own twisted logic and it is in no way related to the rational cause-and-effect world the rest of us attempt to create.

Those who are trying to connect the murders of the officers with the thousands of articulate and peaceful protestors across America are being deliberately misleading in a cynical and selfish effort to turn public sentiment against the protestors. This is the same strategy used when trying to lump in the violence and looting with the legitimate protestors, who have disavowed that behavior. They hope to misdirect public attention and emotion in order to stop the protests and the progressive changes that have already resulted. Shaming and blaming is a lot easier than addressing legitimate claims

Some police unions are especially heinous perpetrators. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s previous public support of protestors has created friction with these unions. The Patrolman’s Benevolent Association responded with a petition asking that the mayor not attend the funerals of officers killed in the line of duty. Following the murders of Ramos and Liu, an account appearing to represent the Sergeants Benevolent Association tweeted: “The blood of 2 executed police officers is on the hands of Mayor de Blasio.” Former New York governor George Pataki tweeted: “Sickened by these barbaric acts, which sadly are a predictable outcome of divisive anti-cop rhetoric of #ericholder and #mayordeblasio. #NYPD.”

This phony and logically baffling indignation is similar to that expressed by the St. Louis County Police Association when it demanded an apology from the NFL when several Rams players entered the field with their hands held high in the iconic Michael Brown gesture of surrender. Or when LeBron James and W.R. Allen wore his “I Can’t Breathe” shirts echoing Eric Gardner’s final plea before dying. Such outrage by police unions and politicians implies that there is no problem, which is the erroneous perception that the protestors are trying to change.

This shrill cry of “policism” (a form of reverse racism) by Pataki and the police unions is a hollow and false whine born of financial self-interest (unions) or party politics (Republican Pataki besmirching Democrat de Blasio) rather than social justice. These tragic murders now become a bargaining chip in whatever contract negotiations or political aspirations they have.

What prompted a mentally unstable man to shoot two officers? Protestors? The mayor? Or the unjust killings of unarmed black men? Probably none of them. He was a ticking bomb that anything might have set off. What’s most likely to prevent future incidents like this? Stopping the protests which had sparked real and positive changes through a national dialogue? Changes that can only increase faith in and respect for the police? No, because the killer was mentally unfit. Most likely protecting the police from future incidents will come from better mental health care to identify, treat, and monitor violent persons. Where are those impassioned tweets demanding that?

In a Dec. 21, 2014 article about the shooting, the Los Angeles Times referred to the New York City protests as “anti-police marches,” which is grossly inaccurate and illustrates the problem of perception the protestors are battling. The marches are meant to raise awareness of double standards, lack of adequate police candidate screening, and insufficient training that have resulted in unnecessary killings. Police are not under attack, institutionalized racism is. Trying to remove sexually abusive priests is not an attack on Catholicism, nor is removing ineffective teachers an attack on education. Bad apples, bad training, and bad officials who blindly protect them, are the enemy. And any institution worth saving should want to eliminate them, too.

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose.” This is the season and time when we should be resolved to continue seeking justice together and not let those with blind biases distract, diminish, or divide us. The way to honor those who defend our liberties with their lives—as did my father and grandfather—is not to curtail liberty, but to exercise it fully in pursuit of a just and peaceful society.

Sal

Sal

"[T]his lady clearly wasn’t present when this occurred,” McCulloch said. “She recounted a statement that was right out of the newspaper about Wilson’s actions, and right down the line with Wilson’s actions. Even though I’m sure she was nowhere near the place.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mikehayes/st-louis-prosecutor-says-he-knew-witnesses-lied#.cigMMOz0G2

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

Her statement is as unjust as the witnesses that said Brown had his hands up, saying don't shoot. They said Brown was shot in the back while surrendering.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


She was lying. There were completely disinterested contractors in the vicinity who said that Brown was surrendering when he was repeatedly shot. Why try to muddy the waters?

Sal

Sal

Joanimaroni wrote:Her statement is as unjust as the witnesses that said Brown had his hands up,

The MAJORITY of the eyewitnesses, by a sizable margin, said he had his hands up.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

They also said he was shot in the back.

Sal

Sal

A reasonable assumption considering Wilson was shooting as Brown ran away.

ALL of the witnesses agree that Brown was facing Wilson when the fatal shots were fired.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


http://www.nationofchange.org/2014/12/22/startling-admission-ferguson-prosecutor-restart-case-darren-wilson/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum