Ferguson Prosecutor May Face Ethics Complaint

Huzzah!

After facing criticism for his handling of the Ferguson grand jury investigation, St. Louis County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch may have his law license threatened.

A group headed by Dr. Christi Griffin with the Ethics Project will meet tonight to determine whether it will file an ethics complaint against McCulloch with the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, an agency of the Missouri Supreme Court.

Griffin says initial reports from the Ferguson police chief that Darren Wilson did not know that Michael Brown was suspected in an earlier convenience store robbery were changed in testimony before the grand jury, and she believes that represents perjury.

“He is the one that is allowing that perjured testimony to be presented to the grand jury, and that is a direct violation of the Code of Professional Ethics,” she says.

Griffin also contends McCulloch did not give the grand jury proper instructions – another ethics violation.

http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2014/12/03/group-threatens-filing-ethics-complaint-against-mcculloch/

They should run the ethics hearing just like he ran the grand jury.

Just throw all the evidence out there with no guidance, selectively leak info to the press, let only people who think he behaved inappropriately testify uncontested, misinform the panel on rules governing a grand jury, and smear his and his family's character.

Seems fair.

" They should run the ethics hearing just like he ran the grand jury."

Do you mean presenting ALL of the evidence in an impartial way?

Oh the horror... cue the racial/class/social justice angst.

I've already agreed that it was unusual... wtf do you want?

You leftist wussy hand wringers are pathetic.

The moral vacuum is strong in this one.

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuDtHrgXp4U

Do you mean presenting ALL of the evidence in an impartial way?


You claim you recognize how corrupt presenting all the evidence without cross examination is, but then above you claim this was done with the intent to be impartial.......you are smarter than what you wrote. It has nothing to do with politics, it has everything to do with justice.

The prosecutor should lose his law license certainly for a year or more, but they will only censure him at best. The system does not work when somebody intentionally sabotages it.

2seaoat wrote:Do you mean presenting ALL of the evidence in an impartial way?


You claim you recognize how corrupt presenting all the evidence without cross examination is, but then above you claim this was done with the intent to be impartial.......you are smarter than what you wrote.   It has nothing to do with politics, it has everything to do with justice.

The prosecutor should lose his law license certainly for a year or more, but they will only censure him at best.   The system does not work when somebody intentionally sabotages it.

Wow! Is that sort of like sabotaging the health care industry with mountains of paperwork to fill out because you needed people forced to purchase health care through government mandates so your stock options would increase in your retirement?

*****CHUCKLE*****

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAD6Obi7Cag

I think Sal's comments on this subject are 100% correct. The Ferguson prosecutor managed his presentation to the Grand Jury to make sure Wilson would not be indicted.

Is it race, or is it his need to protect any accused cop?

Either way, he deserves to be tarred and feathered and run out of town.

Methinks the Feds will do exactly that.

Screw Amerika Inc.! Corporate control of our government through campaign financing.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yeah they said Brown was the one on trial.....

They prolly didn't use that picture since it's not Michael Brown

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/realmikebrown.asp

If Michael Brown had a picture it would prolly look like that...