Go ahead, lay this out for all to see. I'm intrigued.
One has to stay informed where there are global supply chains, currencies, and even what I call political brain farts that emanate out of DC, London or Brussels more than any other capitals in the world.
The unipolar world from WW II to 1991 saw the USA as the lone superpower. Those days are gone and right now Russia is the most powerful in terms of sheer cash and military punch. China now produces a 6th generation fighter jet, and the new Russian Sukhoi T-50 is considered the top fighter jet in the world. The USA has nothing that can even stay in the skies against it. India has now started to co-produce the T-50 because they chose it as their air force air superiority jet.
Case in point, Afghanistan and no victory since October 7, 2001 when shock and awe did not shock or awe the Afghans. I cannot remember the name of the British viceroy of India that commented the third time the Afghans chewed up UK and spit them out but went like this: "Trying to subjugate the Afghans is about as intelligent as going tiger hunting bare handed."
The USA did not learn the lessons of the UK in the 1900's, or that Genghis Khan completely avoided them, or that Alexander the Great met his demise there, or the Russians could not beat them.
Most Americans do not know that the Bush Admin was in negotiations with the Taliban as late as August 2001 and the Taliban would not roll over for their demands. The deal has already been signed with Bridas Corporation out of Argentina. That company is owned by two Italian expats and they are major pipeline builders to this day.
Pushing them out in Afghanistan did not slow things down at all. Major pipeline north from Iran into Russia, selling the oil that way in spite of the sanctions. Major pipeline from Turkmenistan (where they won the US Court of Appeals case in Sept 9, 2003, but 2 years to late to stop Bush and the Big Lie) across Iran and Turkey into EU. Another huge pipeline from Turkmenistan to China, thus further negating even the reason the USA wanted that pipeline and the Caspian since the Carter Administration.
Another case is Iraq, March 2003 to pull out, not a victory even close to achieving.
USA put Georgia up with Israeli and Blackwater USA mercenaries and Ukraine, against tiny South Ossetia. Those are Russians that did not want to be a part of Jewish, USA, Muslim controlled Georgia. USA and EU wanted them in EU and NATO.
They started it, Russia crushed it in 3 days. The goal was to back up Russia north of the Caucasus Mountains and away from the USA pipelines across Georgia. Russia is now permanently parked 25km from those pipelines.
What was wrong with Libya? Qaddafi had mellowed into a benevolent dictator that was moving his nation ahead rapidly, including the world's largest port just to handle inflow into EU. The problem with Libya was he was creating a gold backed dinar that would have had the effect of lessening the value of the petrodollar in the Middle East and North Africa.
What is wrong with Syria? They are in the way of a pipeline from Iraq to the Med and then into Europe.
Why is Russia parked there? They are the energy supplier and natural gas company to EU, bottom line. Gazprom is by far the largest natural gas company in the world and just from that exploration is in Top 10 in oil, too. Rosneft is now the world's largest oil producer and is major supplier to EU, China and Pac Rim. Recently completed major pipeline that terminates near Vladivostok on the Pacific side.
China has major heavy airfreight operations into Prague every day, and trains coming all the way from China across Russia into Poland. What started off as 1 train per week is now 2 unit trains per day.
Under Basel 3, Russia based Sberbank is now 20th largest in the world and climbing. Their capital is hard cash, not US stock market manipulation that is keeping BoA, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup on life support.
Two largest banks in the world are now China, and they have 3 in the top 5. Deposits are not assets, Basel 3 grades on real capital base versus risks and in that regards the UK and USA banks, even Deutsche Bank are toast.
The US, UK banks and Deutsche Bank all share a common form of cancer. They bet the USA would win their strategy, hem in Russia, and control the oil and gas coming out of the Caspian Basin.
This came out the day before 9-11-2001 and is exactly what they were after:
September 10, 2001: "Those who control the oil routes out of Central Asia will impact all future direction and quantities of flow and the distribution of revenues from new production," wrote energy expert James Dorian in Oil & Gas Journal, published the day before the terrorist attacks.
That quote was not in my video presentation 9-11-2004 in NY but there was much more than just the 9 minutes on the Internet. I spoke for 22 minutes and then answered Q&A with the audience for 43 minutes.
There were 1,248 people there, over 1,000 wanted a copy of the PowerPoint that detailed it all and who benefited.
Who did not benefit are the citizens of the United States of America. Just the insiders.
When factoring in the debt, the OPIC funds out the back door to the Rep and Dem insiders, and the pretense of "Nation Building", the real cost of a gallon of gasoline in America is at least 25 times higher than at the pump.
Most Americans cannot get that economic reality straight in their head.
Many experts are saying that both the EU and Fed are manipulating the true inflation rate and interest rates have to be higher because everything is sliding backwards. The bailouts are not working.
In that scenario as early as 2017 or 2018 the USA will not be able to even pay the interest on the debt they have racked up chasing their pipeline dreams and dreams of Empire in a multipolar world.
I have written many articles exposing the lies of 9-11 and what they were really after. Just google Karl Schwarz Bridas, cannot miss some of the key articles.
This world is not as presented on US TV. That is Sheeple Food to keep the masses grazing and thinking DC is out protecting them.
Raping them is more accurate.
To say the USA has a failure of leadership is being kind. Retarded to brain damaged is the proper characterization of what DC is really up to.