RealLindaL wrote: VectorMan wrote:When there are scientists that tell lies about the data collected proving global warming - they no longer have credibility and aren't believed.
Speaking of credibility -- how about your own? How about EDUCATING yourself on your own DEBUNKED conspiracy theories for a change, so you don't sound so totally ignorant?? Here's just a start. If you refuse to read it, don't bother posting your "lies" crap from your right wing rags any more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_conspiracy_theory
Aside from the consensus of all the world's best and greatest scientists, just try using common sense for a change. Picture the world spewing crapola into the atmosphere from the time you were old enough to recognize a smokestack or an exhaust pipe, multiply it umpteen, untold times by every vehicle and industry in the world, day after day, year after year, decade after decade - picture China's huge and murky skies, more recently thrown in -- and do you truly believe that mankind could get away with spewing such pollution for centuries and not see the planet suffer any ill effects whatsoever? Do you think the Earth has some type of automatic atmospheric washing machine? Well, it just doesn't! The future of this planet is in mortal danger and those who bury heads in the sand, not wanting to accept the facts, are making a very grave mistake for which their progeny will rightfully vilify them, if they're still alive to do so.
COMMON SENSE SHOULD dictates to the vast majority of people that saying ALL THE BEST AND GREATEST SCIENTISTS have a consensus on ANYTHING is simply foolish!
EVEN YOU would agree that getting 100 people of ANY description could agree on the color of the sky.
Below there is an article addressing the credibility of the Global Warming sham.
This information and more has been confirmed six ways to Sunday. So if you're going to dispute the information, you'll have to do it without disputing the FACTS. GOOD LUCK!
If you refuse to read the entire article, and follow it up yourself, please don't continue to cry ignorance. You can lead a horse to water....
As you know, Professor Phil Jones was the center of the Global Warming Scam at East Anglia University. Their program was considered the epitome of Global Warming Information. The disclosure of thousands of e-mails proving their efforts to conceal information discredit and even prevent opposing views from being published has wrecked the scam, hopefully forever. Data used by the United Nations IPCC and NASA findings came from EAU.
14th February, 2010
Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing (it has now been disclosed that all the “raw data” was DUMPED!
There has been no global warming since 1995
Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is 'not as good as it should be.
WHAT????
[…]
Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
Phil Jones has said that he considered suicide for his part in this worldwide scam.
Let us also recall: The e-mails leaked in the fall of 2009 allow us to trace the machinations of a small but influential band of British and US climate scientists who played the lead role in the IPCC reports. It appears that this group, which controlled access to basic temperature data, was able to produce a "warming" by manipulating the analysis of the data, but refused to share information on the basic data or details of their analysis with independent scientists who requested them -- in violation of Freedom of Information laws. In fact, they went so far as to keep any dissenting views from being published -- by monopolizing the peer-review process, aided by ideologically cooperative editors of prestigious journals, like Science and Nature.
We learn from the e-mails that the ClimateGate gang was able to "hide the decline" [of global temperature] by applying what they termed as "tricks," and that they intimidated editors and forced out those judged to be "uncooperative." No doubt, thorough investigations, now in progress or planned, will disclose the full range of their nefarious activities. But it is clear that this small cabal was able to convince much of the world that climate disasters were impending -- unless drastic steps were taken. Not only were most of the media, public, and politicians misled, but so were many scientists, national academies of science, and professional organizations -- and even the Norwegian committee that awarded the 2007 Peace Prize to the IPCC and Al Gore, the chief apostle of climate alarmism.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0fa67A02t
Home
