Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Hillary Clinton: "Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business"

Hillary Clinton: "Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business"

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

Stunning gaff...or was she being honest for a change? As everyone here knows is that only 36% trust her.

Hillary Clinton: "Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business"

Is it really a great goal of a presidential candidate to campaign on the platform that they are going to add millions to the Labor Force Participation Rate.

Clinton Hands Republicans Ready-Made Campaign Ad With Promise to Kill Coal Jobs
by Alex Griswold | 11:28 am, March 14th, 2016

When it comes to presidential elections, the cliche that honesty is the best policy is ironically false. Hillary Clinton learned that to her peril in last night’s CNN Democratic town hall, when giving an answer about poverty in white communities.

I’m the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right Tim?

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/clinton-hands-republicans-ready-made-campaign-ad-with-promise-to-kill-coal-jobs/

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

You have to admit, sometimes Hillary really does make good sense.

Burning coal's carbon footprint. The off-fall "tailings" wreckage surrounding coal mining areas, including degraded streams. Black Lung disease. Continuing the use of coal -- as well as its export to countries who make no effort whatever to control coal smoke -- qualifies that industry for fast and permanent termination. If the miners involved were mining potassium cyanide, meant to poison millions of Americans, Semi-sane Markle would still fight for the right of their bosses to poison us all. Reality.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:You have to admit, sometimes Hillary really does make good sense.

Burning coal's carbon footprint.  The off-fall "tailings" wreckage surrounding coal mining areas, including degraded streams. Black Lung disease.  Continuing the use of coal -- as well as its export to countries who make no effort whatever to control coal smoke -- qualifies that industry for fast and permanent termination.  
If the miners involved were mining potassium cyanide, meant to poison millions of Americans, Semi-sane Markle would still fight for the right of their bosses to poison us all.  Reality.

My good friend, Socialist/Communist Wordslinger tries hard to forget that this is 2016. Coal-fired power plants are very sophisticated and ultra-clean.

Communist China learned from us decades ago that cheap, plentiful energy was the secret to growing an economy and prosperity.

Communist China:
Both coal production and consumption peaked in 2013 and has dropped continuously, falling a further 3.7% in the first 11 months of 2015 compared to the same period the year before. [b]On the other hand, as of 2016, China is building or planning 144 new coal-fired power stations, and builds more coal-burning capacity each year than the whole capacity of Britain

Meanwhile, The Wordslinger, like his comrades, believe that punishing workers, especially low and middle income workers with higher and higher energy costs. In other words, forcing the United States in the exact opposite direction that made America great.

My good friend, Wordslinger will now trot out a photo of a highly poluted city in China. What he won't tell you is that the vast majority of the smog is from manufacturing companies.

He'll also tell you how he dreams of the day America will collapse and become like Greece or Venezeula.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

golly, since Semi-sane Markle knows everything I'm going to write here ... I don't need to contribute anymore.

knothead

knothead

It is a misleading comment and taken out of context. The dramatic volume of natural gas has driven the demand for coal to its lowest point in decades . . perhaps ever. That in turn has driven the cost of coal so low that mines can no longer operate safely while remaining profitable . . . . . cheap and plentiful natural gas is closing mines not HRC!

Guest


Guest

The need for all fossil fuels will naturally decline as renewable technologies advance and reserves are depleted.

That is the obvious direction... it doesn't require the force of our enormous central govt or un redistribution schemes.

knothead

knothead

PkrBum wrote:The need for all fossil fuels will naturally decline as renewable technologies advance and reserves are depleted.

That is the obvious direction... it doesn't require the force of our enormous central govt or un redistribution schemes.

You made my point it is market forces at work rather than dark forces hidden in the tree line . . . .

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Wordslinger wrote:golly, since Semi-sane Markle knows everything I'm going to write here ... I don't need to contribute anymore.  

On second thought, turning off the use of coal for fuel saves money since gas costs are less already.  So terminating coal mining ultimately will bring everyone lower fuel costs.

I don't have any photos of Chinese cities.

And finally, one thing for sure, it wasn't shutting down coal mines that damaged Greece's or Venezuela's economies.

Next Semi-sane Markle will tell us how shutting down a polluting industry is bad for America, and how Bob's second floor toilet was clogged by Mr. Obama.

LOL

Markle

Markle

knothead wrote:It is a misleading comment and taken out of context.  The dramatic volume of natural gas has driven the demand for coal to its lowest point in decades . .  perhaps ever. That in turn has driven the cost of coal so low that mines can no longer operate safely while remaining profitable . . . . . cheap and plentiful natural gas is closing mines not HRC!  

How is it taken out of context?

Please explain how this "taken out of context".

"CLINTON: I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right, Tim?

Coal mines are being shut down because of the draconian regulations Lame Duck President Obama placed on coal power plants, just as he promised to harm America.

knothead

knothead

Markle wrote:
knothead wrote:It is a misleading comment and taken out of context.  The dramatic volume of natural gas has driven the demand for coal to its lowest point in decades . .  perhaps ever. That in turn has driven the cost of coal so low that mines can no longer operate safely while remaining profitable . . . . . cheap and plentiful natural gas is closing mines not HRC!  

How is it taken out of context?

Please explain how this "taken out of context".

"CLINTON: I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right, Tim?

Coal mines are being shut down because of the draconian regulations Lame Duck President Obama placed on coal power plants, just as he promised to harm America.


That's easy but I will let you figure it out . . . . . (hint) HRC is also aware of the market forces so you take it from there . . .

2seaoat



Hillary Clinton has little to do with the technology of fracking and the growth of Peaker power plants using NG which has destroyed the coal market......this is all good, but it had nothing to do with Hillary, and Pickens five years ago gave the exact road map for where we are now.....politicians have very little to do with energy markets......but if you are afraid of Hillary.....go ahead and make her the coal boogyman.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Coal mines are being shut down because of the draconian regulations Lame Duck President Obama placed on coal power plants, just as he promised to harm America.

Hillary Clinton: "Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business" LOL_zpsrc5py0ql[/quote]

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

knothead wrote:
Markle wrote:
knothead wrote:It is a misleading comment and taken out of context.  The dramatic volume of natural gas has driven the demand for coal to its lowest point in decades . .  perhaps ever. That in turn has driven the cost of coal so low that mines can no longer operate safely while remaining profitable . . . . . cheap and plentiful natural gas is closing mines not HRC!  

How is it taken out of context?

Please explain how this "taken out of context".

"CLINTON: I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right, Tim?

Coal mines are being shut down because of the draconian regulations Lame Duck President Obama placed on coal power plants, just as he promised to harm America.

That's easy but I will let you figure it out . . . . . (hint) HRC is also aware of the market forces so you take it from there . . .

Thank you!!


Hillary Clinton: "Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business" Your%20request_zpsckeibnex

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Fact: We don't need coal mines or coal miners. Coal is too dirty an energy source, and too expensive also. Reality.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:Fact:  We don't need coal mines or coal miners.  Coal is too dirty an energy source, and too expensive also.  Reality.

Hundreds of millions, if not billions of people's lives and health have been vastly improved by having cheap coal powered energy now available.

Sad to know you are opposed to poor people having a better life.

Why did former President Clinton close one of the largest sources of ultra-clean low sulfur coal from being mined?

You have yet to explain to us all how, in Lame Duck President Obama's words, energy prices will "NECESSARILY SKYROCKET", will help low and moderate income Americans?

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Fact:  We don't need coal mines or coal miners.  Coal is too dirty an energy source, and too expensive also.  Reality.

Hundreds of millions, if not billions of people's lives and health have been vastly improved by having cheap coal powered energy now available.

Sad to know you are opposed to poor people having a better life.

Why did former President Clinton close one of the largest sources of ultra-clean low sulfur coal from being mined?

You have yet to explain to us all how, in Lame Duck President Obama's words, energy prices will "NECESSARILY SKYROCKET", will help low and moderate income Americans?

Keeping them healthy and alive is better than improving their living conditions. Right?

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Fact:  We don't need coal mines or coal miners.  Coal is too dirty an energy source, and too expensive also.  Reality.

Hundreds of millions, if not billions of people's lives and health have been vastly improved by having cheap coal powered energy now available.

Sad to know you are opposed to poor people having a better life.

Why did former President Clinton close one of the largest sources of ultra-clean low sulfur coal from being mined?

You have yet to explain to us all how, in Lame Duck President Obama's words, energy prices will "NECESSARILY SKYROCKET", will help low and moderate income Americans?

Keeping them healthy and alive is better than improving their living conditions.  Right?

Keeping them healthy and alive is done by providing them with electricity so they can have clean running water, able to cook. You prefer they live in mud, squalor and disease.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Fact:  We don't need coal mines or coal miners.  Coal is too dirty an energy source, and too expensive also.  Reality.

Hundreds of millions, if not billions of people's lives and health have been vastly improved by having cheap coal powered energy now available.

Sad to know you are opposed to poor people having a better life.

Why did former President Clinton close one of the largest sources of ultra-clean low sulfur coal from being mined?



Keeping them healthy and alive is better than improving their living conditions.  Right?


You have yet to explain to us all how, in Lame Duck President Obama's words, energy prices will "NECESSARILY SKYROCKET", will help low and moderate income Americans?

Truly, I have never seen you this desperate.  Do you expect us to believe that the plight of low and moderate income Americans, will be helped by selling them energy from coal, when energy from natural gas costs and pollutes less? Your argument is crippled.  Your evil objective here is obvious: You are a shill for the folks who own and get rich off of black lung, polluted streams, tailings, and poisoned air. You have nothing but disdain for America's low and moderate income folks.

Listen up fellow forum members:  It's good to know your enemies!

Down with Amerika Inc., corporate control of our government through corrupt campaign financing.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Hillary Clinton: "Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business"

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum