Did McCarthy admit that the Benghazi Committee was driven by a political vendetta aimed at Hillary?

Salinsky wrote:

PkrBum wrote:New information is still coming out. She has in no way cooperated... not from the first youtube lie to public records.

Cooperated??

She's been begging to testify for months.

2seaoat wrote:Hillary is done regardless.
Nobody trusts her even to be dog catcher


I have despised this woman for twenty years.  I despised the Cubs since the third grade.  I want great baseball teams to win, and the Cubs are simply amazing this year with the youngest team in baseball history going to the playoffs, and in regard to Hillary Clinton, there has NEVER been a presidential candidate with more experience and more prepared to be President.  I know all her flaws, but if America was going into surgery....I want the best doctor.....and right now she is that person.  I do not care if she cheats on Bill....I do not care if she spanks her grandchild.....I want somebody who is competent to run this nation and free us from the grips of the Oligarchy who has stole the American middle class.  

Salinsky wrote:

PkrBum wrote:until this march... and new emails were discovered two weeks ago.

Gowdy really sucks at his job.

Obamasucks wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Hillary is done regardless.
Nobody trusts her even to be dog catcher


I have despised this woman for twenty years.  I despised the Cubs since the third grade.  I want great baseball teams to win, and the Cubs are simply amazing this year with the youngest team in baseball history going to the playoffs, and in regard to Hillary Clinton, there has NEVER been a presidential candidate with more experience and more prepared to be President.  I know all her flaws, but if America was going into surgery....I want the best doctor.....and right now she is that person.  I do not care if she cheats on Bill....I do not care if she spanks her grandchild.....I want somebody who is competent to run this nation and free us from the grips of the Oligarchy who has stole the American middle class.  

Highly unqualified is more like it. What are her accomplishments in any position she has ever held?

As first lady, her man ran around on her getting BJs in the WH.

As a senator from NY, she did nothing but keep the seat warm and help Bill with their money laundering foundation.

As SOS she did accomplish killing four Americans and then lying about the cause (video), then admitting it was a lie, and feigning illness (blood clot on brain after falling quite close to after Benghazi investigation cries were frequent, and now lately lying about her emails, obstructing justice, holding classified info up to TS on her unprotected email server run by multiple companies - one of which suspected foul play as we learned two days ago.....shall I go on disturbed one?

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:He misspoke... nothing new from a politician. Hillary brought this upon herself... all of it. Lying, concealing, obstruction...

She's not suited to wield the presidency... never has been. That goes well beyond the fact she's now damaged goods.

By "Misspoke" you mean he shouldn't have told the truth?  
As for HIllary bringing it on, c'mon .... get real.  Hillary didn't claim they were going to run a non-partisan committee to find out the facts of Benghazi.  And then proceed to leak testimony of favored witnesses to the press.  Facts are, there's not a democrat in the house who didn't recognize from the start that Gowdy and his gang were only there to swiftboat Hillary.  

And now, the very worst possible thing that can happen to a conservative republican has happened.  Some shithead on the Hannity show, let the cat out of the bag!  Methinks Hillary's likable percentage just doubled.

Look, it's no big deal Pkrbum ... Since Dubya's scares that Saddam had the bomb,  your team hasn't won a single award for honesty ... or honor.  So McCarthy's on camera blunder doesn't really stand out that much.  It's just another crack in a glass that's been spilling water since 9-11.

Reality.

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

PkrBum wrote:He misspoke... nothing new from a politician. Hillary brought this upon herself... all of it. Lying, concealing, obstruction...

She's not suited to wield the presidency... never has been. That goes well beyond the fact she's now damaged goods.

By "Misspoke" you mean he shouldn't have told the truth?  
As for HIllary bringing it on, c'mon .... get real.  Hillary didn't claim they were going to run a non-partisan committee to find out the facts of Benghazi.  And then proceed to leak testimony of favored witnesses to the press.  Facts are, there's not a democrat in the house who didn't recognize from the start that Gowdy and his gang were only there to swiftboat Hillary.  

And now, the very worst possible thing that can happen to a conservative republican has happened.  Some shithead on the Hannity show, let the cat out of the bag!  Methinks Hillary's likable percentage just doubled.

Look, it's no big deal Pkrbum ... Since Dubya's scares that Saddam had the bomb,  your team hasn't won a single award for honesty ... or honor.  So McCarthy's on camera blunder doesn't really stand out that much.  It's just another crack in a glass that's been spilling water since 9-11.

Reality.

Who won the Liar of the Year Award?

Wouldn't it be easier for you to print this out and posting next to your computer rather than playing the perfect foil and asking me to re-post it on a regular basis.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”
- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003"  (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)


He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.
-  Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."
- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going?  How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President?  Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities.  Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.

Bob wrote:So if ya'll knew about this "months" ago like Sal says,  then ya'll are psychic and can see the future.  

Bob wrote:Oh bullshit,  Sal.   His admission came last week on Hannity.  Not before.
Yes you probably knew this was what he was THINKING from the time he came out of the womb because you're a genius psychic.  But that's not what this thread is about.

Salinsky wrote:

That's right, Bob.

He admitted last week what we've been trying to tell you for months.

All you have to do is go back and peruse the probably four or five dozen threads PkrBum has authored regarding the Hillary email "scandal".

Wordslinger wrote:Markle, all this crapola -- how pathetic.  America's blundering, tragic and costly attempt to take over and run Iraq is recognized as an abject failure as much by your own party as by the democrats.  Who was for the invasion doesn't matter.  It was and is a fucking disaster.  Ask Trump's followers.  LOL

Bob wrote:

Sal,  let me tell you what this is like.  Let's put it in terms of the Clinton scandal.
Markle all along would have been telling us he knew that Clinton "had sex with that woman" the whole time Clinton was denying it.  He would have been psychic just like you are.  
But it was when Clinton finally stopped denying that he got the blow jobs is when the story changed.  That's when Clinton was telling us "it depends on what the meaning of is is".  Just like if you asked McCarthy right now he'd tell you the same goddamn thing that it depends on what the meaning of the word is is.

Yes,  you can read the minds of conservatives and merkle can read the minds of liberals.  I get that.  lol

Bob wrote:Oh bullshit,  Sal.   His admission came last week on Hannity.  Not before.
Yes you probably knew this was what he was THINKING from the time he came out of the womb because you're a genius psychic.  But that's not what this thread is about.

Floridatexan wrote:

Bob wrote:Oh bullshit,  Sal.   His admission came last week on Hannity.  Not before.
Yes you probably knew this was what he was THINKING from the time he came out of the womb because you're a genius psychic.  But that's not what this thread is about.

http://correctrecord.org/benghazi-by-the-numbers/

A person would have to be brain dead not to see these "investigations" for what they are. Read the stats.