Which republican candidate will be the next to get flushed?

Floridatexan wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Salinsky wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:Hilarity regarding a Trisomy 18 child?

You are really sick.

I had no idea that the girl had Trisomy 18, you bitter old scold.

I'd never even heard of Trisomy 18 before I read your post.

I just think the expressions on all of their faces are hilarious.

The boy standing behind her is every bit as funny.

Stick a sock in it.

But you never once considered something could be wrong with a preteen carrying a doll.

Think before you critize and make fun.  There are many special needs children that look perfectly normal but they are not.

Yeah, it's a real shame that little girl's father is using her disability to advance his political career.  

Joanimaroni wrote:

Biden was worse using his dead wife and child to campaign while lying through his teeth about the accudent....then attempted to use his dead son to run for president.....what a scum bag.

But you seem to  think disabled children should be hidden in a closet instead of standing on stage.

Bob wrote:Did you know this,  tex?

from wiki...

In the early 1980s, "Another One Bites the Dust" was one of many popular rock songs that Christian evangelists alleged contained subliminal messages through a technique called backmasking. It was claimed that the chorus, when played in reverse, can be heard as "Decide to smoke marijuana",^[15] "It's fun to smoke marijuana",^[16] or "Start to smoke marijuana".^[17] A spokeswoman for Hollywood Records (Queen's current US label) has denied that the song contains such a message.^[18]

lol

Salinsky wrote:

Bob wrote:Walker and Jindal will get flushed first.  Some of the others should get flushed too but won't because they're "message" candidates and their message can collect enough donors to keep the message going.  

Walker already got flushed.

Have you been on a bender?

Salinsky wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:Hilarity regarding a Trisomy 18 child?

You are really sick.

I had no idea that the girl had Trisomy 18, you bitter old scold.

I'd never even heard of Trisomy 18 before I read your post.

I just think the expressions on all of their faces are hilarious.

The boy standing behind her is every bit as funny.

Stick a sock in it.

Salinsky wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Biden was worse using his dead wife and child to campaign while lying through his teeth about the accudent....then attempted to use his dead son to run for president.....what a scum bag.

But you seem to  think disabled children should be hidden in a closet instead of standing on stage.

You really are despicable.

Markle wrote:plus we have numerous other, highly qualified candidates to step in if Trump stumbles

Markle wrote:Seems that the Democrats should be far more concerned about who is getting flushed from their bench before the election.  After all, they only have one candidate, under investigation by the FBI, the State Department, a house committee, the NSA and who knows how many others.

Hillary Clinton gets flushed and where do you go?

Donald Trump is already being shown as leading Hillary Clinton plus we have numerous other, highly qualified candidates to step in if Trump stumbles.

Hillary Clinton claimed she owned the actions in Libya so now that has turned to a major SNAFU, where does she go from here?

Salinsky wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Biden was worse using his dead wife and child to campaign while lying through his teeth about the accudent....then attempted to use his dead son to run for president.....what a scum bag.

But you seem to  think disabled children should be hidden in a closet instead of standing on stage.

You really are despicable.

Bob wrote:Don't worry,  luckily we have the spouse of a former President and she'll be able to save us all and make the country great again.  She'll make quick work of  Putin and the middle east while she gives us all middle class jobs again.  I feel it in my bones.  Good times are a comin.

boards of FL wrote:

Bob wrote:Don't worry,  luckily we have the spouse of a former President and she'll be able to save us all and make the country great again.  She'll make quick work of  Putin and the middle east while she gives us all middle class jobs again.  I feel it in my bones.  Good times are a comin.

Highly unlikely.  

As long as we can continue to reduce the deficit, avoid another war in the middle east, continue to expand and protect rights of the LGBT community, listen to the scientific community with respect to our climate, protect the open internet, and protect access to health insurance for the roughly 16 million Americans who gained it by way of the ACA, that should be good enough for the time being.  Unfortunately, we won't be able to address the middle class until house district gerrymandering is corrected.  

It's better to live in reality and assess things as they actually are than to sit on the fence and incorrectly frame everything as extreme.

Bob wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

Bob wrote:Don't worry,  luckily we have the spouse of a former President and she'll be able to save us all and make the country great again.  She'll make quick work of  Putin and the middle east while she gives us all middle class jobs again.  I feel it in my bones.  Good times are a comin.

Highly unlikely.  

As long as we can continue to reduce the deficit, avoid another war in the middle east, continue to expand and protect rights of the LGBT community, listen to the scientific community with respect to our climate, protect the open internet, and protect access to health insurance for the roughly 16 million Americans who gained it by way of the ACA, that should be good enough for the time being.  Unfortunately, we won't be able to address the middle class until house district gerrymandering is corrected.  

It's better to live in reality and assess things as they actually are than to sit on the fence and incorrectly frame everything as extreme.

bds,

You're now starting to take your candidate as seriously as the Trump'ites do. 
Chill out.  They're just politicians.  Any and all of them.

boards of FL wrote:Great commentary, Bob.  As usual.

2seaoat wrote:You can't really expect much better from someone who has declared that he'll cast his vote for Trump solely for the entertainment value.


It says it all.

2seaoat wrote:No Bob, it is a matter of intelligence.   Intelligent folks realize that government in order to run competently need competent folks running government.  Policies and platforms matter.   Generic propaganda is not a substitute for substantive policy.  This continual concept of a wrassling match as if it is about personalities and not policy is bone chilling stupid.   Is it being an elitist to expect policy alternatives and intelligent conversation about the same?   Yep, when we have allowed this country to be dumbed down and manipulated that government is bad and that somehow America is bad.   Sorry, bone chilling stupid.