If abortion is not murder,

Wordslinger wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yeah and SHE should pay for it and the money used to finance orphanages.

No doubt women everywhere tremble at the sound of your name.  You should write rules for their conduct, lift out selected lines from your holy book.  Maybe direct public stonings of girls who dare to direct their own lives.  Go for it, it's your God-given right!!  He did make them a secondary class -- Adam's rib and all that, right?  LOL  

SheWrites wrote:

If it is a woman's choice, if it is her body (it is), then she needs to be responsible in all areas of life - not just the choice to have an abortion.  Someone who has shown a lack of planning and protection - not only to prevent pregnancy but also to prevent being infected with sexually transmitted disease - is not making wise choices and is not responsible.  But suddenly when she has  repercussion to her poor choices she suddenly gets a choice to abort and someone else pays for it.


But she is RESPONSIBLE FOR HER CHOICE AND NEEDS TO PAY.  This is not on the tab of others.  Let the damn boy/man who had his quick flip of joy foot the bill.  

That is my objection to abortion...lack of responsibility.  And this spills over into many areas of life and affects the nation as a whole.  

No one is down on women, Wordslinger.  Just sick of the lack of responsibility and then the outcry for someone else to pay.

Floridatexan wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Salinsky wrote:Convenience?

I personally know a woman who was pregnant with a fetus with zero viability, and it posed a significant health risk to the woman if carried to term.

I cannot imagine her and her husband facing that with no options because the government controlled the woman's body.

But, that unthinkable dilemma is just what the GOP is proposing.

The majority of those pregnancies end in spontaneous abortions.

But not ALL...and mine was followed by a D&C.  In fact, I just read about a woman who had suffered a spontaneous abortion, aka miscarriage, for the uninformed, was following up at Planned Parenthood, and had to go through a crowd jeering and screaming at her on the way in.  Need I remind you of the local clinic bombing?  The murdered doctor?  The anti-abortion activist who was sleeping with his charges?

You are a little confused, a spontaneous abortion can be complete or incomplete. An incomplete spontaneous abortion may require a D&C but will depend how much POC  (product of conception) is retained.  A complete spontaneous abortion does not require a D&C. I have had both.

No, I'm not confused.  I understand what happened to me.  I also understand that without the law as it is written I would have no rights over my own body...that is what at least 3...if not more...GOP candidates for president are advocating...no exceptions.  And that is bullshit.

Joanimaroni wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Salinsky wrote:Convenience?

I personally know a woman who was pregnant with a fetus with zero viability, and it posed a significant health risk to the woman if carried to term.

I cannot imagine her and her husband facing that with no options because the government controlled the woman's body.

But, that unthinkable dilemma is just what the GOP is proposing.

The majority of those pregnancies end in spontaneous abortions.

But not ALL...and mine was followed by a D&C.  In fact, I just read about a woman who had suffered a spontaneous abortion, aka miscarriage, for the uninformed, was following up at Planned Parenthood, and had to go through a crowd jeering and screaming at her on the way in.  Need I remind you of the local clinic bombing?  The murdered doctor?  The anti-abortion activist who was sleeping with his charges?

You are a little confused, a spontaneous abortion can be complete or incomplete. An incomplete spontaneous abortion may require a D&C but will depend how much POC  (product of conception) is retained.  A complete spontaneous abortion does not require a D&C. I have had both.

No, I'm not confused.  I understand what happened to me.  I also understand that without the law as it is written I would have no rights over my own body...that is what at least 3...if not more...GOP candidates for president are advocating...no exceptions.  And that is bullshit.

Yes you were....not all spontaneous abortions are followed by a D&C.


Some abortions are necessary.

SheWrites wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yeah and SHE should pay for it and the money used to finance orphanages.

No doubt women everywhere tremble at the sound of your name.  You should write rules for their conduct, lift out selected lines from your holy book.  Maybe direct public stonings of girls who dare to direct their own lives.  Go for it, it's your God-given right!!  He did make them a secondary class -- Adam's rib and all that, right?  LOL  

If it is a woman's choice, if it is her body (it is), then she needs to be responsible in all areas of life - not just the choice to have an abortion.  Someone who has shown a lack of planning and protection - not only to prevent pregnancy but also to prevent being infected with sexually transmitted disease - is not making wise choices and is not responsible.  But suddenly when she has  repercussion to her poor choices she suddenly gets a choice to abort and someone else pays for it.


But she is RESPONSIBLE FOR HER CHOICE AND NEEDS TO PAY.  This is not on the tab of others.  Let the damn boy/man who had his quick flip of joy foot the bill.  

That is my objection to abortion...lack of responsibility.  And this spills over into many areas of life and affects the nation as a whole.  

No one is down on women, Wordslinger.  Just sick of the lack of responsibility and then the outcry for someone else to pay.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Enlighten me.  Tell me exactly how she got pregnant should have anything to do with her right to abort the fetus if she so desires. The truth is, except in the case of a minor, all pregnant women have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  You want to force your insane biblical interpretations on everyone, using the U.S. government to enforce such laws were they enacted.  Fuck you and your insane, vain, abusive and cruel anti-feminist god!

Obamasucks wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Enlighten me.  Tell me exactly how she got pregnant should have anything to do with her right to abort the fetus if she so desires. The truth is, except in the case of a minor, all pregnant women have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  You want to force your insane biblical interpretations on everyone, using the U.S. government to enforce such laws were they enacted.  Fuck you and your insane, vain, abusive and cruel anti-feminist god!

How about we are PAYING FOR IT?

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Enlighten me.  Tell me exactly how she got pregnant should have anything to do with her right to abort the fetus if she so desires. The truth is, except in the case of a minor, all pregnant women have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  You want to force your insane biblical interpretations on everyone, using the U.S. government to enforce such laws were they enacted.  F*** you and your insane, vain, abusive and cruel anti-feminist god!

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Enlighten me.  Tell me exactly how she got pregnant should have anything to do with her right to abort the fetus if she so desires. The truth is, except in the case of a minor, all pregnant women have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  You want to force your insane biblical interpretations on everyone, using the U.S. government to enforce such laws were they enacted.  F*** you and your insane, vain, abusive and cruel anti-feminist god!

Again, you are uninformed.  Also your desperation is obvious rendering a reply to your "comment" futile.

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Enlighten me.  Tell me exactly how she got pregnant should have anything to do with her right to abort the fetus if she so desires. The truth is, except in the case of a minor, all pregnant women have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  You want to force your insane biblical interpretations on everyone, using the U.S. government to enforce such laws were they enacted.  F*** you and your insane, vain, abusive and cruel anti-feminist god!

Again, you are uninformed.  Also your desperation is obvious rendering a reply to your "comment" futile.

Your answer totally avoids responding to the points I made.  All women in America do have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  Clearly, your and your anti-choice brethren want to have the government enforce your biblical interpretations on everyone else.  Obviously you are unable to deny this, we -- all of us, including most women -- understand how you want to change our government to a theocracy.  Just who will you put up as our American Ayatollah?

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Enlighten me.  Tell me exactly how she got pregnant should have anything to do with her right to abort the fetus if she so desires. The truth is, except in the case of a minor, all pregnant women have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  You want to force your insane biblical interpretations on everyone, using the U.S. government to enforce such laws were they enacted.  F*** you and your insane, vain, abusive and cruel anti-feminist god!

Again, you are uninformed.  Also your desperation is obvious rendering a reply to your "comment" futile.

Your answer totally avoids responding to the points I made.  All women in America do have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  Clearly, your and your anti-choice brethren want to have the government enforce your biblical interpretations on everyone else.  Obviously you are unable to deny this, we -- all of us, including most women -- understand how you want to change our government to a theocracy.  Just who will you put up as our American Ayatollah?

Obamasucks wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Markle wrote:

knothead wrote:It is the MOTHER'S decision to have control over her body NOT the government . . . . . . . not complicated.

Didn't she have the opportunity to "control her body" BEFORE she got pregnant?

How she got pregnant doesn't really matter.  If she doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, that's her business.

Yes, it really does matter.

I would have guessed that by now, you would know how she got pregnant.

Enlighten me.  Tell me exactly how she got pregnant should have anything to do with her right to abort the fetus if she so desires. The truth is, except in the case of a minor, all pregnant women have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  You want to force your insane biblical interpretations on everyone, using the U.S. government to enforce such laws were they enacted.  F*** you and your insane, vain, abusive and cruel anti-feminist god!

Again, you are uninformed.  Also your desperation is obvious rendering a reply to your "comment" futile.

Your answer totally avoids responding to the points I made.  All women in America do have a right to abort within the time limits prescribed by law.  Clearly, your and your anti-choice brethren want to have the government enforce your biblical interpretations on everyone else.  Obviously you are unable to deny this, we -- all of us, including most women -- understand how you want to change our government to a theocracy.  Just who will you put up as our American Ayatollah?

What are the prescribed limits for a bald eagle egg? Hmmmm...in the shell and forming makes destroying one a 2 year prison sentence and 250k fine.

Obamasucks wrote:Funny, the government controls the fertilized egg of the
Bald eagle but not a human.
What the hell is wrong with us?

Obamasucks wrote:Does anyone know why wordslinger must yell( type in caps)
For all of his posts?
It just makes him look like a jackass

Obamasucks wrote:by Salinsky on 8/10/2015, 4:58 pm
Convenience?

I personally know a woman who was pregnant with a fetus with zero viability, and it posed a significant health risk to the woman if carried to term.

I cannot imagine her and her husband facing that with no options because the government controlled the woman's body.

But, that unthinkable dilemma is just what the GOP is proposing.
-----
Less than 1/10 of one percent

SheWrites wrote:Heard my grand baby's heart beat today!  15 weeks 5 days.  Strong!