HRC criticizes BHOs foreign policy

PACEDOG#1 wrote:NOt one liberal comment about HRC tossing Obama under the bus.....lol

PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-obama-foreign-policy-isis-gaza-failure-141410915.html

A major rat jumping ship.....

Ahead of a possible presidential run, Hillary Clinton appears to be distancing herself from what she called President Barack Obama's foreign policy "failure": the decision not to intervene during the early stages of the Syrian civil war.


In an interview with The Atlantic published on Sunday, the former secretary of state says the "failure" of the United States to those protesting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad led to the rise of al-Qaida-inspired groups like ISIS, the militants currently creating havoc in Syria and Iraq.

“The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad — there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle — that failure left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled,” Clinton said.

Looks like she was against all the red lines BHO was drawing in the sand...or was she for them before she was against them????

PACEDOG#1 wrote:And here we go finally a participant. The issue is this Sal. She was SOS and that is sort of your go to person for foreign policy....

Nuf said

Dead meat

Sal wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-obama-foreign-policy-isis-gaza-failure-141410915.html

A major rat jumping ship.....

Ahead of a possible presidential run, Hillary Clinton appears to be distancing herself from what she called President Barack Obama's foreign policy "failure": the decision not to intervene during the early stages of the Syrian civil war.


In an interview with The Atlantic published on Sunday, the former secretary of state says the "failure" of the United States to those protesting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad led to the rise of al-Qaida-inspired groups like ISIS, the militants currently creating havoc in Syria and Iraq.

“The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad — there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle — that failure left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled,” Clinton said.

Looks like she was against all the red lines BHO was drawing in the sand...or was she for them before she was against them????

This is not rocket science.

HRC is running for POTUS.

She would like to put a little distance between herself and an unpopular conflict, that's all.

She knows we had no good options in Syria.

We don't like Assad, the opposition to Assad were overwhelmingly jihadists financed and armed by our allies in the region, and the "moderate" forces were shadowy and weak.

The "big vacuum" that allowed the militias to grow was the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

And, there's no putting that genie back in the bottle.

Our interests would be best served if the Assad regime and its opposition battled on to a stalemate for decades.

The "red line" was an effort to prevent the wholesale slaughter of civilians, and it resulted in the removal of chemical weapons from Syria to be destroyed at sea.

Remember that?

Yeah, me neither.

Markle wrote:

Sal wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-obama-foreign-policy-isis-gaza-failure-141410915.html

A major rat jumping ship.....

Ahead of a possible presidential run, Hillary Clinton appears to be distancing herself from what she called President Barack Obama's foreign policy "failure": the decision not to intervene during the early stages of the Syrian civil war.


In an interview with The Atlantic published on Sunday, the former secretary of state says the "failure" of the United States to those protesting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad led to the rise of al-Qaida-inspired groups like ISIS, the militants currently creating havoc in Syria and Iraq.

“The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad — there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle — that failure left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled,” Clinton said.

Looks like she was against all the red lines BHO was drawing in the sand...or was she for them before she was against them????

This is not rocket science.

HRC is running for POTUS.

She would like to put a little distance between herself and an unpopular conflict, that's all.

She knows we had no good options in Syria.

We don't like Assad, the opposition to Assad were overwhelmingly jihadists financed and armed by our allies in the region, and the "moderate" forces were shadowy and weak.

The "big vacuum" that allowed the militias to grow was the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

And, there's no putting that genie back in the bottle.

Our interests would be best served if the Assad regime and its opposition battled on to a stalemate for decades.

The "red line" was an effort to prevent the wholesale slaughter of civilians, and it resulted in the removal of chemical weapons from Syria to be destroyed at sea.

Remember that?

Yeah, me neither.

Obviously it IS rocket science for you.

Sal wrote:

Markle wrote:

Sal wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-obama-foreign-policy-isis-gaza-failure-141410915.html

A major rat jumping ship.....

Ahead of a possible presidential run, Hillary Clinton appears to be distancing herself from what she called President Barack Obama's foreign policy "failure": the decision not to intervene during the early stages of the Syrian civil war.

In an interview with The Atlantic published on Sunday, the former secretary of state says the "failure" of the United States to those protesting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad led to the rise of al-Qaida-inspired groups like ISIS, the militants currently creating havoc in Syria and Iraq.

“The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad — there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle — that failure left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled,” Clinton said.

Looks like she was against all the red lines BHO was drawing in the sand...or was she for them before she was against them????

This is not rocket science.

HRC is running for POTUS.

She would like to put a little distance between herself and an unpopular conflict, that's all.

She knows we had no good options in Syria.

We don't like Assad, the opposition to Assad were overwhelmingly jihadists financed and armed by our allies in the region, and the "moderate" forces were shadowy and weak.

The "big vacuum" that allowed the militias to grow was the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

And, there's no putting that genie back in the bottle.

Our interests would be best served if the Assad regime and its opposition battled on to a stalemate for decades.

The "red line" was an effort to prevent the wholesale slaughter of civilians, and it resulted in the removal of chemical weapons from Syria to be destroyed at sea.

Remember that?

Yeah, me neither.

Obviously it IS rocket science for you.

And, I see like your good friend PeeDawg, you have NOTHING.

Keep up the good work!

2seaoat wrote:Your girl won't be POTUS


What possible reason would lead you to that conclusion.

PkrBum wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Your girl won't be POTUS


What possible reason would lead you to that conclusion.

She actually has a record and history. I think she would be better than obama... but that's not saying much.

Different rodeo clown... same results. That goes for whatever asshat the pubs throw out there too. Yea team..!!