http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/john-kerrys-moment-96111.html
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
Then today, President Barack Hussein torpedoed Secretary of State John Kerry and the rest of his advisors adding more to the typical chaos of this administration.PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/john-kerrys-moment-96111.html
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
Of course you think John Kerry is more Presidential than Barack Obama.PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/john-kerrys-moment-96111.html
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
Last edited by CarlSagan on 9/1/2013, 2:07 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo)
CarlSagan wrote:Of course you think John Kerry is more Presidential than Barack Obama.PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/john-kerrys-moment-96111.html
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
John Kerry is white.
That was not difficult to figure out.
"You can tell a bigot; but not much."
Again, more insults to deflect the issue being discussed.Markle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:Of course you think John Kerry is more Presidential than Barack Obama.PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/john-kerrys-moment-96111.html
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
John Kerry is white.
That was not difficult to figure out.
"You can tell a bigot; but not much."
LOL, 90% of the content of your posts are pure insults.CarlSagan wrote:Again, more insults to deflect the issue being discussed.Markle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:Of course you think John Kerry is more Presidential than Barack Obama.PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/john-kerrys-moment-96111.html
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
John Kerry is white.
That was not difficult to figure out.
"You can tell a bigot; but not much."
Prove me wrong, I challenge you.
Prove that yours are p-dog's pure, unadulterated, unabashed, contemptuous hatred for Obama is ONLY BECAUSE OF HIS POLITICS. Be specific, and prove what the mostly moderate Obama has done to create such a culture of disdain which causes you and p-dog, etal, to insult him and his wife so personally.
Could it be that the mere fact that he is POTUS is so insulting to you and p-dog, that your anger has poisoned your minds toward such hatred??
Please answer with specifics and without insults.
CarlSagan wrote:Again, more insults to deflect the issue being discussed.Markle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:Of course you think John Kerry is more Presidential than Barack Obama.PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/john-kerrys-moment-96111.html
Yep. Just my humble opinion though.
John Kerry is white.
That was not difficult to figure out.
"You can tell a bigot; but not much."
Prove me wrong, I challenge you.
Prove that yours are p-dog's pure, unadulterated, unabashed, contemptuous hatred for Obama is ONLY BECAUSE OF HIS POLITICS. Be specific, and prove what the mostly moderate Obama has done to create such a culture of disdain which causes you and p-dog, etal, to insult him and his wife so personally.
Could it be that the mere fact that he is POTUS is so insulting to you and p-dog, that your anger has poisoned your minds toward such hatred??
Please answer with specifics and without insults.
****************************************************PACEDOG#1 wrote:Yep, ANYTHING negative about Obama always has to be RACISM. It has nothing to do with facts or perception. My perception is that John Kerry has already been more of the POTUS without the title than Obama with.
Carl errrrrrrrrrrrr WTM can't add anything to the discussion so OUT comes the race card. LOL Hilarious.
I challenge you to post facts, figures, diagrams, video, etal, that proves how you can hold such utter contempt for someone you have never met and do not really know only because of his politics. What has he and his wife done to deserve such personal attacks on their character and even her body habitus. (If you think the First Lady is fat which is exactly what you have typed on this forum recently, you must get turned on by looking at a pencil)PACEDOG#1 wrote:Yep, ANYTHING negative about Obama always has to be RACISM. It has nothing to do with facts or perception. My perception is that John Kerry has already been more of the POTUS without the title than Obama with.
Carl errrrrrrrrrrrr WTM can't add anything to the discussion so OUT comes the race card. LOL Hilarious.
CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB. You simply cannot have this much hatred only because of his politics. Prove to me that it is more than the color of his skin, and I will stop.
“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”CarlSagan wrote:I challenge you to post facts, figures, diagrams, video, etal, that proves how you can hold such utter contempt for someone you have never met and do not really know only because of his politics. What has he and his wife done to deserve such personal attacks on their character and even her body habitus. (If you think the First Lady is fat which is exactly what you have typed on this forum recently, you must get turned on by looking at a pencil)PACEDOG#1 wrote:Yep, ANYTHING negative about Obama always has to be RACISM. It has nothing to do with facts or perception. My perception is that John Kerry has already been more of the POTUS without the title than Obama with.
Carl errrrrrrrrrrrr WTM can't add anything to the discussion so OUT comes the race card. LOL Hilarious.
In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB. You simply cannot have this much hatred only because of his politics. Prove to me that it is more than the color of his skin, and I will stop. As long as you keep posting your hate/filth/crap and do not justify with specific actions (such as lying to the world about WMDs so they can send American soldiers to their death) then you will continue to be called on it by me.
So sorry that we all do not appreciate your bigoted hatred the way your bubble comrades do.
Some of us have class and decorum.
I wonder, are they the ones calling for unity, compromise and to help the poor?
Or the ones who enjoy insulting the President and the First Lady every chance they get?
You decide.
"What you reap is what you sow."
Damaged Eagle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB. You simply cannot have this much hatred only because of his politics. Prove to me that it is more than the color of his skin, and I will stop.
George W. Bush didn't carpet bomb countries that we weren't officially at war with and do it without Congressional approval.
Yep! That's really moderate and bridging the gap with that Nobel Peace Prize.
Can you say Obama the war criminal?
*****SMILE*****
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXP4tRUuqUY
There was a declaration of war with Afghanistan? There was a declaration of war with Iraq? What are you talking about? We haven't been officially at war since WW II. Bombs were flying but they called it a Police Action or some other contrived label.Damaged Eagle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB. You simply cannot have this much hatred only because of his politics. Prove to me that it is more than the color of his skin, and I will stop.
George W. Bush didn't carpet bomb countries that we weren't officially at war with and do it without Congressional approval.
Yep! That's really moderate and bridging the gap with that Nobel Peace Prize.
Can you say Obama the war criminal?
*****SMILE*****
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXP4tRUuqUY
Yes there was. There was also Security Council Resolution 1441 from the United Nations authorizing the use of force.othershoe1030 wrote:There was a declaration of war with Afghanistan? There was a declaration of war with Iraq? What are you talking about? We haven't been officially at war since WW II. Bombs were flying but they called it a Police Action or some other contrived label.Damaged Eagle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB. You simply cannot have this much hatred only because of his politics. Prove to me that it is more than the color of his skin, and I will stop.
George W. Bush didn't carpet bomb countries that we weren't officially at war with and do it without Congressional approval.
Yep! That's really moderate and bridging the gap with that Nobel Peace Prize.
Can you say Obama the war criminal?
*****SMILE*****
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXP4tRUuqUY
No, there was not. UNSCR 1441 was 'an authorization to use force.' It was not a declaration of war. You are confused, again, Mr. Markle. That revised history you're constantly fed from WorldNetDaily and Fox News really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.Markle wrote:Yes there was. There was also Security Council Resolution 1441 from the United Nations authorizing the use of force.othershoe1030 wrote:There was a declaration of war with Afghanistan? There was a declaration of war with Iraq? What are you talking about? We haven't been officially at war since WW II. Bombs were flying but they called it a Police Action or some other contrived label.Damaged Eagle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB. You simply cannot have this much hatred only because of his politics. Prove to me that it is more than the color of his skin, and I will stop.
That revised history you're constantly fed from the DailyKOS and The Nation really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.
CarlSagan wrote:No, there was not. UNSCR 1441 was 'an authorization to use force.' It was not a declaration of war. You are confused, again, Mr. Markle. That revised history you're constantly fed from WorldNetDaily and Fox News really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.Markle wrote:Yes there was. There was also Security Council Resolution 1441 from the United Nations authorizing the use of force.othershoe1030 wrote:There was a declaration of war with Afghanistan? There was a declaration of war with Iraq? What are you talking about? We haven't been officially at war since WW II. Bombs were flying but they called it a Police Action or some other contrived label.Damaged Eagle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB. You simply cannot have this much hatred only because of his politics. Prove to me that it is more than the color of his skin, and I will stop.
That revised history you're constantly fed from the DailyKOS and The Nation really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.
Markle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:Markle wrote:One is an authorization to use force.othershoe1030 wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:No, there was not. UNSCR 1441 was 'an authorization to use force.' It was not a declaration of war. You are confused, again, Mr. Markle. That revised history you're constantly fed from WorldNetDaily and Fox News really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB.
That revised history you're constantly fed from the DailyKOS and The Nation really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.
PLEASE explain in detail the difference between an authorization to use FORCE against another nation and a Declaration of War.
The other is a declaration of war.
Quite simple, even for a conservative. Wait, perhaps more explanation is needed, I forgot who I am dealing with....
au·thor·i·za·tion
[aw-ther-uh-zey-shuhn]
noun
1.the act of authorizing.
2.permission or power granted by an authority; sanction.
3.a legislative act authorizing money to be spent for government programs that specifies a maximum spending level without provision for actual funds.
dec·la·ra·tion
[dek-luh-rey-shuhn]
noun
1.the act of declaring; announcement: a declaration of a dividend.
2.a positive, explicit, or formal statement; proclamation: a declaration of war.
3.something that is announced, avowed, or proclaimed.
I hope this helps you with your confusion, Mr. Markle.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Last edited by CarlSagan on 9/2/2013, 6:20 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo)
Not surprising you missed the point of the exercise. When asked a question, President Barack Hussein Obama answers a different question as well.CarlSagan wrote:Markle wrote:CarlSagan wrote:Markle wrote:One is an authorization to use force.othershoe1030 wrote:Damaged Eagle wrote:No, there was not. UNSCR 1441 was 'an authorization to use force.' It was not a declaration of war. You are confused, again, Mr. Markle. That revised history you're constantly fed from WorldNetDaily and Fox News really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.CarlSagan wrote:In reality, Obama has been a more moderate GWB.
That revised history you're constantly fed from the DailyKOS and The Nation really has you convinced. That's a shame. Try doing some of your own research for a change.
PLEASE explain in detail the difference between an authorization to use FORCE against another nation and a Declaration of War.
The other is a declaration of war.
Quite simple, even for a conservative. Wait, perhaps more explanation is needed, I forgot who I am dealing with....
au·thor·i·za·tion
[aw-ther-uh-zey-shuhn]
noun
1.the act of authorizing.
2.permission or power granted by an authority; sanction.
3.a legislative act authorizing money to be spent for government programs that specifies a maximum spending level without provision for actual funds.
dec·la·ra·tion
[dek-luh-rey-shuhn]
noun
1.the act of declaring; announcement: a declaration of a dividend.
2.a positive, explicit, or formal statement; proclamation: a declaration of war.
3.something that is announced, avowed, or proclaimed.
I hope this helps you with your confusion, Mr. Markle.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » I will admit that Kerry was more Presidential in his speech yesterday for 3 minutes than Obama has been for 5 years.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum