Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Guantanamo’s Tab: $2.7 Million Per Prisoner

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

I don't have an easy answer what to do with these clowns but someone in authority needs to make a decision and get these cretins on their way to someplace else. I would suggest loading a C-17 up with them, strap them to a parachute and push them out over the most desolate area of Afghanistan available.

"Report says prison far costlier than previously disclosed"

By Carol Rosenberg
New number-crunching by Democrats campaigning for Guantánamo’s closure says the Pentagon spends nearly a half-billion dollars a year — a whopping $2.7 million per prisoner — to operate its offshore prison complex in southeast Cuba.

The figure is by far the largest per-prisoner cost ever calculated and apparently, for the first time, includes troop costs. The ostensibly temporary Pentagon prison has, since it opened in 2002, been staffed largely by troops who received additional training for the assignment. The rotations typically last nine months to a year.

The cost for this year — $454.1 million to operate, staff and build at the prison complex — comes from a report by the Defense Department’s Office of the Comptroller.

It was first provided to Congress on June 27 by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and made public last week.

The report says the Pentagon will have spent $5.242 billion by the end of 2014.

The total costs, however, are likely higher. The accounting does not appear to include the prison camps’ state-of-the-art headquarters, built in 2004 for $13.5 million, or a secret lockup for ex-CIA prisoners, called Camp 7, whose price tag is considered classified.

In addition, the Justice Department and FBI have devoted staff to detainee operations, and probably the CIA.

Still, at Guantánamo, the prison camps spokesman, Navy Capt. Robert Durand said the $2.7 million per prisoner figure apparently represents “fully loaded costs” of maintaining what is today a 2,000-strong staff at the sprawling detention center zone where 166 captives are confined to seven different lockups — including the hospital and psychiatric wards.

One way to reach that figure, said Durand, would be a “soup to nuts” accounting, including contractor costs as well as possibly the salaries and benefits of the National Guard and Reserve forces who make up about half of the 1,700 uniformed troops working at the prison — mostly U.S. Army military police and infantry troops.

In 2011, a Miami Herald report estimated per-prisoner costs at $800,000 a year, dubbing the detention center “arguably the most expensive prison on Earth.” That figure was based on an accounting by the U.S. Southern Command that totaled $138.8 million in operating costs. Southcom said then it was not possible to account for all costs of staffing the prison. At the time it had 171 captives and a staff of 1,850 troops and contractors.

The Pentagon comptroller’s report to Congress shows that the actual cost in 2011 was $521.9 million.

Army Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale said the Department of Defense now estimates the detention center’s operating budget at about $150 million a year — and considers military construction and troop salaries an entirely different matter. Guantánamo’s mobilized reservists would likely be serving anyway, perhaps in Afghanistan, he said.
“The cost of the various salaries of service members and contractors who would be paid the same regardless of where they’re assigned is not a cost we include in our total Guantánamo detention facility cost approximation,” he said.

“To be sure,” Breasseale said, “$150 million a year is hardly a reasonable cost to the American taxpayer and, as the president has stated, it is terrifically inefficient.”

The comptroller figures, dated June 2013 and marked “For Official Use Only,” first surfaced last week at a subcommittee hearing at the Senate Judiciary Committee called by Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., a longtime advocate of closure.

“Do the math: 166 prisoners, $454 million. We are spending $2.7 million per year for each detainee held at Guantánamo Bay,” he said last Wednesday. “What does it cost to put a prisoner and keep them in the safest and most secure prison in America in Florence, Colo.? $78,000 a year against $2.7 million that we’re spending in Guantánamo.”

More math shows Dur-bin’s $78,000 estimate of Colorado SuperMax confinement means Guantánamo is about 35 times as expensive in a prison that doesn’t maintain a court system or house, feed and entertain its guards.

Guantánamo’s troops “do a magnificent job under difficult circumstances,” said Durbin, according to a transcript of the hearing. But the costs “would be fiscally irresponsible during ordinary economic times. But it’s even worse when the Department of Defense is struggling to deal with the impact of sequestration, including the furloughs and cutbacks and training for our troops.”

The Defense Department report doesn’t specifically detail housing costs, and Durbin’s spokesman said the senator’s staff had no additional information. But the comptroller’s summary of costs provides categories that the Pentagon now acknowledges are prison-camp related.

For 2013 they include:

*$14.1 million for prisoner review boards for the 71 captives at Guantánamo who are currently not cleared for release, convicted of crimes or awaiting trial;

*$40 million, already appropriated by Congress for a not-yet-built fiber-optic cable linking the base to Florida;

*$56.9 million for contractors, including intelligence analysts, librarians and linguists;

*$65.9 million to the Navy base, which functions as a landlord to the detention center zone, and charges for use of its facilities, including prison staff housing;

*$116 million for the base’s war court complex, including security, translation and computer services as well as charter fights between Washington and Guantánamo.

At the U.S. Southern Command in Doral, Army Col. Greg Julian said the $454.1 million estimate for this year does include some one-time infrastructure expenses, such as the $40 million fiber-optic cable. But it “doesn’t take into consideration all the money we requested to replace the aging facilities” — including construction of a new Camp 7 for the alleged architect of the 9/11 attack, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, and 14 other former CIA captives.

Southcom has also sought but not yet won appropriation of funding for a new prison dining facility for both troops and captives and new barracks for the troops, who now live in a range of housing around the base.

Guest


Guest

nochain wrote:I don't have an easy answer what to do with these clowns but someone in authority needs to make a decision and get these cretins on their way to someplace else. I would suggest loading a C-17 up with them, strap them to a parachute and push them out over the most desolate area of Afghanistan available.

"Report says prison far costlier than previously disclosed"

By Carol Rosenberg
New number-crunching by Democrats campaigning for Guantánamo’s closure says the Pentagon spends nearly a half-billion dollars a year — a whopping $2.7 million per prisoner — to operate its offshore prison complex in southeast Cuba.

The figure is by far the largest per-prisoner cost ever calculated and apparently, for the first time, includes troop costs. The ostensibly temporary Pentagon prison has, since it opened in 2002, been staffed largely by troops who received additional training for the assignment. The rotations typically last nine months to a year.

The cost for this year — $454.1 million to operate, staff and build at the prison complex — comes from a report by the Defense Department’s Office of the Comptroller.

It was first provided to Congress on June 27 by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and made public last week.

The report says the Pentagon will have spent $5.242 billion by the end of 2014.

The total costs, however, are likely higher. The accounting does not appear to include the prison camps’ state-of-the-art headquarters, built in 2004 for $13.5 million, or a secret lockup for ex-CIA prisoners, called Camp 7, whose price tag is considered classified.

In addition, the Justice Department and FBI have devoted staff to detainee operations, and probably the CIA.

Still, at Guantánamo, the prison camps spokesman, Navy Capt. Robert Durand said the $2.7 million per prisoner figure apparently represents “fully loaded costs” of maintaining what is today a 2,000-strong staff at the sprawling detention center zone where 166 captives are confined to seven different lockups — including the hospital and psychiatric wards.

One way to reach that figure, said Durand, would be a “soup to nuts” accounting, including contractor costs as well as possibly the salaries and benefits of the National Guard and Reserve forces who make up about half of the 1,700 uniformed troops working at the prison — mostly U.S. Army military police and infantry troops.

In 2011, a Miami Herald report estimated per-prisoner costs at $800,000 a year, dubbing the detention center “arguably the most expensive prison on Earth.” That figure was based on an accounting by the U.S. Southern Command that totaled $138.8 million in operating costs. Southcom said then it was not possible to account for all costs of staffing the prison. At the time it had 171 captives and a staff of 1,850 troops and contractors.

The Pentagon comptroller’s report to Congress shows that the actual cost in 2011 was $521.9 million.

Army Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale said the Department of Defense now estimates the detention center’s operating budget at about $150 million a year — and considers military construction and troop salaries an entirely different matter. Guantánamo’s mobilized reservists would likely be serving anyway, perhaps in Afghanistan, he said.
“The cost of the various salaries of service members and contractors who would be paid the same regardless of where they’re assigned is not a cost we include in our total Guantánamo detention facility cost approximation,” he said.

“To be sure,” Breasseale said, “$150 million a year is hardly a reasonable cost to the American taxpayer and, as the president has stated, it is terrifically inefficient.”

The comptroller figures, dated June 2013 and marked “For Official Use Only,” first surfaced last week at a subcommittee hearing at the Senate Judiciary Committee called by Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., a longtime advocate of closure.

“Do the math: 166 prisoners, $454 million. We are spending $2.7 million per year for each detainee held at Guantánamo Bay,” he said last Wednesday. “What does it cost to put a prisoner and keep them in the safest and most secure prison in America in Florence, Colo.? $78,000 a year against $2.7 million that we’re spending in Guantánamo.”

More math shows Dur-bin’s $78,000 estimate of Colorado SuperMax confinement means Guantánamo is about 35 times as expensive in a prison that doesn’t maintain a court system or house, feed and entertain its guards.

Guantánamo’s troops “do a magnificent job under difficult circumstances,” said Durbin, according to a transcript of the hearing. But the costs “would be fiscally irresponsible during ordinary economic times. But it’s even worse when the Department of Defense is struggling to deal with the impact of sequestration, including the furloughs and cutbacks and training for our troops.”

The Defense Department report doesn’t specifically detail housing costs, and Durbin’s spokesman said the senator’s staff had no additional information. But the comptroller’s summary of costs provides categories that the Pentagon now acknowledges are prison-camp related.

For 2013 they include:

*$14.1 million for prisoner review boards for the 71 captives at Guantánamo who are currently not cleared for release, convicted of crimes or awaiting trial;

*$40 million, already appropriated by Congress for a not-yet-built fiber-optic cable linking the base to Florida;

*$56.9 million for contractors, including intelligence analysts, librarians and linguists;

*$65.9 million to the Navy base, which functions as a landlord to the detention center zone, and charges for use of its facilities, including prison staff housing;

*$116 million for the base’s war court complex, including security, translation and computer services as well as charter fights between Washington and Guantánamo.

At the U.S. Southern Command in Doral, Army Col. Greg Julian said the $454.1 million estimate for this year does include some one-time infrastructure expenses, such as the $40 million fiber-optic cable. But it “doesn’t take into consideration all the money we requested to replace the aging facilities” — including construction of a new Camp 7 for the alleged architect of the 9/11 attack, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, and 14 other former CIA captives.

Southcom has also sought but not yet won appropriation of funding for a new prison dining facility for both troops and captives and new barracks for the troops, who now live in a range of housing around the base.

         Certainly releasing them to their home countries has been a mistake...Not surprising though that this is an overpaid fiasco...

Nekochan

Nekochan

Are the inmates currently being tried? I know that Obama put a hold on most legal proceedings when he was first elected. I think the trials need to be held if they are still being held up.

Guest


Guest

Nekochan wrote:Are the inmates currently being tried?  I know that Obama put a hold on most legal proceedings when he was first elected.  I think the trials need to be held if they are still being held up.

      Didn't the cowh close that place as promised to do so in 2007/8/9/10/11/12/13?...

Nekochan

Nekochan

newswatcher wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Are the inmates currently being tried?  I know that Obama put a hold on most legal proceedings when he was first elected.  I think the trials need to be held if they are still being held up.

      Didn't the cowh close that place as promised to do so in 2007/8/9/10/11/12/13?...

LOL.

Guest


Guest

Nekochan wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Nekochan wrote:Are the inmates currently being tried?  I know that Obama put a hold on most legal proceedings when he was first elected.  I think the trials need to be held if they are still being held up.

      Didn't the cowh close that place as promised to do so in 2007/8/9/10/11/12/13?...

LOL.  

     HEY....HE REALLY MEANS IT THIS TIME!!!!....

Sal

Sal

Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

      So.....he didn't have the intestinal fortitude to follow through on one of his 'core convictions'?....It's been five years and he's still talking that this is not economically sound?...So for five years he's continued wasteful spending on a project he promised to close?...Your post is 'disingenuous' and lacking of logic...

Sal

Sal

newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

      So.....he didn't have the intestinal fortitude to follow through on one of his 'core convictions'?....It's been five years and he's still talking that this is not economically sound?...So for five years he's continued wasteful spending on a project he promised to close?...Your post is 'disingenuous' and lacking of logic...

GITMO is an enormous shit sammich created by the previous administration, and thus far Obama has been reluctant to eat it alone.

He wants Congress to take a bite.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

      So.....he didn't have the intestinal fortitude to follow through on one of his 'core convictions'?....It's been five years and he's still talking that this is not economically sound?...So for five years he's continued wasteful spending on a project he promised to close?...Your post is 'disingenuous' and lacking of logic...

GITMO is an enormous shit sammich created by the previous administration, and thus far Obama has been reluctant to eat it alone.

He wants Congress to take a bite.

   He's been reluctant to be a leader....

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

You people??? Kind of a broad brush there Sally. As usual. Your knowledge of the issue is only wikipedia deep, how about having someone read this excellent explanation of the problem and see if it helps. As I stated in the thread opening I don't have a solution and it's apparent you don't either so you resort to your fallback "it's all those idiot repubs fault". You are a joke.

"Why hasn’t Obama closed Guantanamo Bay?"

...."Obama pledged that, though he failed to close the facility after first coming into office, he would try again. “I’m going to go back at this,” he said. “I’ve asked my team to review everything that’s currently being done in Guantanamo, everything that we can do administratively, and I’m going to re-engage with Congress to try to make the case that this is not something that’s in the best interests of the American people.”
The impromptu comments were a little surprising for their rhetoric, sounding more like a 2007 campaign speech than the words of someone who has been U.S. president for four-plus years. As the New Yorker’s Amy Davidson put it, “He spoke as if he had happened upon the place, like a bystander.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/04/30/obama-just-gave-a-powerful-speech-about-the-need-to-close-gitmo-so-why-hasnt-he/

Guest


Guest

You all are either a bunch of damned liars and hypocrites, or you don't follow the national news.
Obama has tried to shut down Gitmo several times and been denied the funds to do so by the Republicans in the House of Representatives. The House controls the money.

That is a fact.

Gitmo was fine with you people when Bush established it. Now you're such hypocrites that it's an evil drag to the economy and is Obama's fault.

What a bunch of liars.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/8/congress-deals-death-blow-gitmo-closure/?page=all

And by the way, even the Democrats in the Senate won't let him do it. It has nothing at all to do with what Obama wants.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/19/guantanamo.detainees/


Now, as some other poster likes to say, STFU about Obama not wanting to shut down Gitmo.

Guest


Guest

bluemoon wrote:You all are either a bunch of damned liars and hypocrites, or you don't follow the national news.
Obama has tried to shut down Gitmo several times and been denied the funds to do so by the Republicans in the House of Representatives. The House controls the money.

That is a fact.

Gitmo was fine with you people when Bush established it. Now you're such hypocrites that it's an evil drag to the economy and is Obama's fault.

What a bunch of liars.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/8/congress-deals-death-blow-gitmo-closure/?page=all

And by the way, even the Democrats in the Senate won't let him do it. It has nothing at all to do with what Obama wants.

Funny. Who controlled the House for the first two years? Oh that's right -everyone was busy trying to SAVE AMERICA through health care reform. Hilarious. No - Obama can't do much about Gitmo on his own but he does need to do what he has promised on many occasions - engage Congress with a solution. That will require foreign diplomacy efforts in addition to dealing with the house. It's just not on his radar screen until he gets nudged like in the example given in the article - and why should he care - he knows in a few years he will turn the problem over to someone else. The "detainees" should never have been allowed to leave the country where captured alive. But that would have caused quivering bleeding heart liberals too much angst.

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

President Barack Hussein Obama made that promise before he started getting the real security briefings each morning.  Although he only attends a few a week, he seems to have found out that some of those folks really are evil and releasing or trying them is not an option.  That must have been a shock to President Obama that the policies and doctrine of President George Walker Bush we 100% right.



Last edited by Markle on 8/1/2013, 10:47 pm; edited 1 time in total

Nekochan

Nekochan

Markle wrote:
Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

President Barack Hussein Obama made that promise before he started getting the real security briefings each morning.  Although he only attends a few a week, he seems to have found out that some of those folks real are evil and releasing or trying them is not an option.  That must have been a shock to President Obama that the policies and doctrine of President George Walker Bush we 100% right.

My thoughts, exactly. GITMO, wiretapping, NSA..it was all evil when Obama was campaigning.

boards of FL

boards of FL

nochain wrote:I would suggest loading a C-17 up with them, strap them to a parachute and push them out over the most desolate area of Afghanistan available.

Good thing you have no say in this.


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
nochain wrote:I would suggest loading a C-17 up with them, strap them to a parachute and push them out over the most desolate area of Afghanistan available.

Good thing you have no say in this.

      Why spend on parachutes?.....

boards of FL

boards of FL

newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

      So.....he didn't have the intestinal fortitude to follow through on one of his 'core convictions'?....It's been five years and he's still talking that this is not economically sound?...So for five years he's continued wasteful spending on a project he promised to close?...Your post is 'disingenuous' and lacking of logic...

GITMO is an enormous shit sammich created by the previous administration, and thus far Obama has been reluctant to eat it alone.

He wants Congress to take a bite.

   He's been reluctant to be a leader....


Obama does something on his own: "He's a tyrant! He's skirting the constitution! Impeach! Impeach! He is pissing all over the constitution"

Obama wants to act with congress: "He's a reluctant leader! He's a liar!"


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Oh, for fuck's sake!

Obama tried to have these people moved to a supermax facility and tried within our borders, and you people collectively flooded your panties in terror.

Quit being so fucking disingenuous.

      So.....he didn't have the intestinal fortitude to follow through on one of his 'core convictions'?....It's been five years and he's still talking that this is not economically sound?...So for five years he's continued wasteful spending on a project he promised to close?...Your post is 'disingenuous' and lacking of logic...

GITMO is an enormous shit sammich created by the previous administration, and thus far Obama has been reluctant to eat it alone.

He wants Congress to take a bite.

   He's been reluctant to be a leader....


Obama does something on his own:  "He's a tyrant!  He's skirting the constitution!  Impeach!  Impeach!  He is pissing all over the constitution"

Obama wants to act with congress: "He's a reluctant leader!  He's a liar!"

     Not true....the one thing he's done on his own....[name] cowh healthcare...although now there's a delay on that...this was his major accomplishment?...He promised this wouldn't cost Americans "one thin dime"...true statement or not?. The co-author of this mess has called it a 'train wreck' and has decided not to run for re-election.....His anti-gun legislation backfired on him and he found out there are still MANY that support the second amendment but that doesn't stop him for using any tragedy to try and link to gun agenda...Never called for him to be impeached simply because we don't know the details of these 'phoney' scandals as he calls them...He said 'heads would roll' over the IRS Scandal and their actions were unacceptable...well what's happened to those responsible?....He campaigned/said that NO American would be subjected to surveilance without probable cause....has he lived up to that?....His Justice department under his buddy Holder Fast and Furious.... His Buddy 'mislead' Congress while testifying...what's been done?...It was his administration that mislead the American People about Benghazi...They intentionally attempted to sell the story that it was an internet movie that was responsible and a spontaneous protest...The major player in the mess (Rice) received a PROMOTION for her incompetence...This was his decision...

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
nochain wrote:I would suggest loading a C-17 up with them, strap them to a parachute and push them out over the most desolate area of Afghanistan available.

Good thing you have no say in this.

True enough wimp, good for the terrorists anyway. So what is your opinion of Obamas infamous "kill list" and his authorizing attacks on known or suspected terrorists and U.S. citizens who had the bad sense to threaten the U.S.? Personally, I have no problem with it because they gladly do worse to us.

Guantanamo’s Tab: $2.7 Million Per Prisoner AmerCasuaIED1

Guest


Guest

I suspect the high amount of funds we are spending on this facility is nothing more than a transfer of our wealth to cuba. A little favor to the fellow comrads from obama.

Im all for closing it there, but it should be open somewhere else other than on American soil because I am against these rats obtaining citizen rights and then they could end up being set free here in our country. Its already happened.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum