Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Big Three Network Double Standard on Labeling Scandalous Politicians

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

VectorMan

VectorMan

All too often when reporters are discussing Democrats caught in scandals, they develop a peculiar speech impediment that prevents them from uttering the "D" word. However, when members of the GOP stumble, the word "Republican" cascades out of the mouths of reporters.

When news broke on February 15 that former Democratic Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. was charged with improperly spending campaign funds on (among other items) Michael Jackson and Bruce Lee memorabilia, the Big Three (ABC, CBS, NBC) network anchors and reporters struggled to get their lips to form the word "Democrat." In 15 total stories on Jackson, reporters failed to utter the "D" word in 11 of them (73 percent). On the February 21 CBS This Morning Jackson was labeled a Democrat, but only in an on-screen graphic.

When word got out that the FBI was investigating New Jersey Democratic Senator Bob Menendez's jaunts (that may have included solicitation of prostitutes) with a campaign contributor to the Dominican Republic, the Big Three networks whistled past the scandal by airing a total of just eight stories since the story broke on January 24.

The reluctance to attach the "D" label to Jackson and give limited coverage to Menendez are typical examples of the liberal media's reluctance to tarnish the Democratic Party with its more ethically- challenged members. It's a courtesy that they have not extended to scandalized members of the GOP.

Over the years, the MRC has chronicled the vast disparity in how GOP politicians embroiled in scandals are covered compared to how sullied Democrats are covered, or in some cases, not covered.

The Following Scandal is Rated R (for Republican)

A prime example of network reporters withholding the "D" label came in October 2011. On Halloween of that year, MF Global Holdings filed for bankruptcy with a shady mystery: some $1.6 billion was missing from their customers' accounts. Financial analysts blamed the company's CEO, Jon Corzine, a former Democratic U.S. Senator and Governor of New Jersey, who became the center of an FBI investigation. In 22 total stories and briefs following the news that Corzine's brokerage firm filed for bankruptcy, and his subsequent testimony before the Senate only once was Corzine's party affiliation mentioned, when Kelly O'Donnell noted it, in her December 8, 2011 NBC Nightly News report.

When former Democratic New York Governor Eliot Spitzer found himself mired in a prostitution scandal in 2008 an MRC study found that within the first week of news coverage Spitzer was only identified as a Democrat 20 percent of the time.

This is in sharp contrast to the coverage former South Carolina Republican Governor Mark Sanford received when he admitted, in 2009, to having flown to Argentina to carry on an extramarital affair. Within the first 24 hours of Sanford's confession he was identified as a Republican 100 percent of the time, during coverage on all the networks. In just the first week since Sanford admitted the tryst there were 49 stories on the Big Three network morning and evening shows.

In 2008 former Democratic Mayor of Detroit Kwame Kilpatrick was sent to jail for violating the terms of his bond after he had been indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice for lying about his affair with his chief of staff, as well as their roles in the firing of two police officers. In 40 total Big Three network stories and briefs on Kilpatrick's troubles in the entire year of 2008 he was called a Democrat on just two occasions, both times on CBS.

In 2008 Kilpatrick, and the aforementioned Spitzer, weren't the only pols caught in sex scandals. A look at the ABC, CBS, NBC morning and evening shows in the days after scandals for Senators David Vitter (for prostitution) and Larry Craig (for bathroom stall toe-tapping) their party affiliation was included on every show. The key difference separating Vitter and Craig from Spitzer and Kilpatrick being that they were Republicans.

When an intern to former Democratic Congressman Gary Condit went missing back in 2001 the networks flooded their programs with stories on the search for Chandra Levy and speculated on Condit's involvement. Curiously, most of these stories did not include the Congressman's party affiliation. An MRC study done at the time looked at the ABC, NBC and CBS's morning and evening news programs from May 14 through July 12 of that year and found that in a total of 179 stories the Democratic label was applied only 14 times or less than 8% of the stories. Six of those labels came paired with adjectives such as "conservative" or "right-wing," so as to distance Condit from other party members.

Even further back from the Condit scandal, the networks, for the most part, covered up the party label of disgraced Democratic Louisiana Governor Edwin Edwards. On May 9, 2000, the former four-term governor was convicted on 17 counts of fraud and racketeering. CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News passed on the news with no Democratic label. The late ABC World News Tonight's Peter Jennings avoided the D-word around his conviction, but later arrived at the party identification indirectly: "He got support from old line white Democrats, blacks and Cajuns. He was one of them."

Democratic Scandal? What Democratic Scandal?

It's bad enough that the Big Three networks forget to label Democrats in scandal stories, sometimes they don't bother to mention the scandals at all. In 2009 a number of Democrats were faced with various scandals that went completely unreported on ABC, CBS and NBC.

Democratic Representative Charles Rangel, the then Chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, was forced to pay $75,000 in unpaid taxes and the House ethics committee launched an investigation into whether a Carribean trip he and four other Democrats took was improper.

Network coverage of the Rangel scandals: 0 stories.

In addition to Rangel, Democratic Congressmen John Murtha, Pete Visclosky and Jim Moran were linked to a scandal involving the PMA Group, a lobbying group that was forced to close in 2009 after being raided by the FBI. According to the New York Times Its top lobbyist was suspected of funneling "bogus" campaign contributions to the aforementioned Democrats in exchange for directing more than $100 million to PMA clients.

Network coverage: Just three stories on Murtha. Visclosky and Moran were never mentioned in any network story.

In 2008 ex-Democratic Congressman William Jefferson lost a run-off election late that year after investigators found $90,000 in cash stuffed in the congressman's freezer. In January 2009 NBC made brief references to the charges against Jefferson in a profile of his successor, Republican Joseph Cao. However, Jefferson's bribery trial that began on June 9, 2009 in which prosecutors said he received $400,000 in bribes to help orchestrate business deals in Africa — was never mentioned on the networks.

The lesson seems clear. While members of both parties have had falls from grace, in the eyes of the Big Three network reporters and anchors, the GOP is the only party that deserves to be punished for the sins of a few.



Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2013/02/21/big-three-network-double-standard-labeling-scandalous-politicians#ixzz2LZ6Of7fT

Guest


Guest

Even the massive Google server farm couldn't hold all the examples of liberal media bias.

Big Three Network Double Standard on Labeling Scandalous Politicians Article-0-158CAE40000005DC-837_964x641

polecat

polecat

Fox Does It Again - Identifies A Republican As A Democrat.

Reported by Donna - October 10, 2007 -





Today on Fox and Friends they had s couple of segments on a NYC Councilman , James Oddo, who was punked by a fake foreign correspondant. Fox and Friends compared it to an interview on the Daily Show where they play tricks on politicians. In the first segment, Judge Andrew Napolitano called the Councilman a Conservative Democrat when in reality he is a Republican.

The foreign (Norway) correspondant apparently asked embarrassing questions about Hillary's chances because of President Clinton's scandal. The Councilman jumped up and the Fox and Friends crew said he threw her out of the office shouting 16 f bombs.

They then put out a call for emails on who was right - the councilman or the correspondant. Later they read two emails that said the councilman was wrong. This was when the audience thought the Councilman was a Democrat.

Comments: As an afterthought Doocy said before the Clinton question the woman correspondant said disparaging things about race in America and Barack Obama. Instead he concentrated on the Hillary question. On the second segment in the second hour they said the Councilman was a Republican but made no apology nor did they recant what Judge Andrew Napolitano said in the first segment.

Another thing is people and politicians in the U.S. know the Daily Show and what to expect. This little known Norwegian correspondant was not evident at all of representing herself like the Daily Show.

Sal

Sal

polecat wrote:Fox Does It Again - Identifies A Republican As A Democrat.

Reported by Donna - October 10, 2007 -





Today on Fox and Friends they had s couple of segments on a NYC Councilman , James Oddo, who was punked by a fake foreign correspondant. Fox and Friends compared it to an interview on the Daily Show where they play tricks on politicians. In the first segment, Judge Andrew Napolitano called the Councilman a Conservative Democrat when in reality he is a Republican.

The foreign (Norway) correspondant apparently asked embarrassing questions about Hillary's chances because of President Clinton's scandal. The Councilman jumped up and the Fox and Friends crew said he threw her out of the office shouting 16 f bombs.

They then put out a call for emails on who was right - the councilman or the correspondant. Later they read two emails that said the councilman was wrong. This was when the audience thought the Councilman was a Democrat.

Comments: As an afterthought Doocy said before the Clinton question the woman correspondant said disparaging things about race in America and Barack Obama. Instead he concentrated on the Hillary question. On the second segment in the second hour they said the Councilman was a Republican but made no apology nor did they recant what Judge Andrew Napolitano said in the first segment.

Another thing is people and politicians in the U.S. know the Daily Show and what to expect. This little known Norwegian correspondant was not evident at all of representing herself like the Daily Show.

Newsbusters will get to the bottom of this!

Big Three Network Double Standard on Labeling Scandalous Politicians Tumblr_lq25dru0rJ1qj4vj5o1_400

polecat

polecat


June 24, 2009 02:00 PM
SHOCKING: Fox News Labels Disgraced Republican Mark Sanford -- A Democrat


124 comments
By Logan Murphy



I think it's just automatic now. When a high-profile Republican gets into trouble, Fox News steps in to mislead their sheep viewers by labeling them as Democrats.

Here's a short list of Fox's chyron hackery:

John McCain - Democrat

Joe Lieberman - Democrat

Arlen Spector - Democrat (when he was still a Republican!)

Mark Foley - Democrat

Media Matters also caught Fox listing a Democratic strategist as Bush's head of FEMA -- because his name happened to be Michael Brown. Oh, and we can't forget the time they announced Rep. William Jefferson's indictment using footage of Congressman John Conyers. They apologized to their audience, but never to Conyers personally.

I'm sure it was just an oversight, just like all the rest...riiiight. Have I missed any?

Dave N:

It's almost a clockwork thing.

Whenever Fox News wants you to forget that someone is actually a Republican, they, ah, accidentally label them a Democrat on their chryon and let it go. So they did that today, as you can see, while Mark Sanford was explaining that he had been in Argentina to screw around on his wife. (They corrected it in later chryons.)

Hardly the first time this has happened.



There was the time they ID'ed Mark Foley, in the midst of another sex scandal, as a Democrat too.

At other times with sex scandals, as with Sen. Larry Craig, they simply have forgotten to identify them as Republicans.

They've also done it when someone's Republican status is inconvenient:



When Arlen Specter was attacking conservative shibboleths, he got labeled a D too.



And then there was the time John McCain was labeled a Democrat too. At the time that just seemed weird, but now, with Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh and a host of other conservatives promoting the notion that McCain was just a fake Republican anyway, it makes a certain kind of sense.

Fox sense, that is.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

As scandalous as Jesse Jackson Jr.'s behavior is, there are scandals frequently from both sides of the aisle. What I can't figure out is, why is it that Democratic scandals tend to center around money, while Republican scandals seem to revolve around sexual behavior?

Maybe it is because Democrats tend to get enough sex, but never have enough money, while Repubicans tend to have enough money, but just can't get enough sex (or...maybe the kind of of sex Republicans enjoy is scandalous by itself...).

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

VectorMan

VectorMan

polecat wrote:
June 24, 2009 02:00 PM
SHOCKING: Fox News Labels Disgraced Republican Mark Sanford -- A Democrat


124 comments
By Logan Murphy



I think it's just automatic now. When a high-profile Republican gets into trouble, Fox News steps in to mislead their sheep viewers by labeling them as Democrats.

Here's a short list of Fox's chyron hackery:

John McCain - Democrat

Joe Lieberman - Democrat

Arlen Spector - Democrat (when he was still a Republican!)

Mark Foley - Democrat

Media Matters also caught Fox listing a Democratic strategist as Bush's head of FEMA -- because his name happened to be Michael Brown. Oh, and we can't forget the time they announced Rep. William Jefferson's indictment using footage of Congressman John Conyers. They apologized to their audience, but never to Conyers personally.

I'm sure it was just an oversight, just like all the rest...riiiight. Have I missed any?

Dave N:

It's almost a clockwork thing.

Whenever Fox News wants you to forget that someone is actually a Republican, they, ah, accidentally label them a Democrat on their chryon and let it go. So they did that today, as you can see, while Mark Sanford was explaining that he had been in Argentina to screw around on his wife. (They corrected it in later chryons.)

Hardly the first time this has happened.



There was the time they ID'ed Mark Foley, in the midst of another sex scandal, as a Democrat too.

At other times with sex scandals, as with Sen. Larry Craig, they simply have forgotten to identify them as Republicans.

They've also done it when someone's Republican status is inconvenient:



When Arlen Specter was attacking conservative shibboleths, he got labeled a D too.



And then there was the time John McCain was labeled a Democrat too. At the time that just seemed weird, but now, with Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh and a host of other conservatives promoting the notion that McCain was just a fake Republican anyway, it makes a certain kind of sense.

Fox sense, that is.

I understand what you're saying. They're idiots too. But, they're only one channel among sooooo many other liberal ones.

Guest


Guest

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:As scandalous as Jesse Jackson Jr.'s behavior is, there are scandals frequently from both sides of the aisle. What I can't figure out is, why is it that Democratic scandals tend to center around money, while Republican scandals seem to revolve around sexual behavior?

Maybe it is because Democrats tend to get enough sex, but never have enough money, while Repubicans tend to have enough money, but just can't get enough sex (or...maybe the kind of of sex Republicans enjoy is scandalous by itself...).

.......................................

Hmmm...

Abramoff and DeLay were having sex...?

Damn. That had to have a money angle.

Wait a minute. I thought Jack was paying Tom to screw America.

I'm confused and it's all your fault.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum