Homehttp://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/26/former-brain-dead-liberal-filmmaker-pens-scathing-column-on-gun-control-a-political-appeal-to-the-ignorant/
Pensacola Discussion Forum
This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.
Message [Page 1 of 2]
2 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 9:05 am
Guest
Guest
PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/26/former-brain-dead-liberal-filmmaker-pens-scathing-column-on-gun-control-a-political-appeal-to-the-ignorant/
This administration has used this approach on several issues...
4 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:00 pm
Sal
Soooo, ... let us give public employees in schools money and guns to protect our children, but prevent other public employees from doing background checks on people who purchase guns because that would cost money ... and Marxism, ... or something?
Brilliant!
Brilliant!
5 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:05 pm
Guest
Guest
Sal wrote:Soooo, ... let us give public employees in schools money and guns to protect our children, but prevent other public employees from doing background checks on people who purchase guns because that would cost money ... and Marxism, ... or something?
Brilliant!
Is or has there been someone that came out against background checks?...
6 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:18 pm
Sal
newswatcher wrote:Sal wrote:Soooo, ... let us give public employees in schools money and guns to protect our children, but prevent other public employees from doing background checks on people who purchase guns because that would cost money ... and Marxism, ... or something?
Brilliant!
Is or has there been someone that came out against background checks?...
Yes.
The person who penned the article upon which this thread is based.
Learn to read.
7 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:22 pm
Guest
Guest
what sally and the liberals don't get is that background checks are already standard. Requiring law abiding gun owners to check the background of someone that wants to buy their guns as a resale item is unconstitutional. Criminals and such aren't getting their weapons from gun shows or private sales. They are getting them from One Eyed Mafia dude who is skirting the law.
8 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:27 pm
Guest
Guest
Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:Sal wrote:Soooo, ... let us give public employees in schools money and guns to protect our children, but prevent other public employees from doing background checks on people who purchase guns because that would cost money ... and Marxism, ... or something?
Brilliant!
Is or has there been someone that came out against background checks?...
Yes.
The person who penned the article upon which this thread is based.
Learn to read.
Where specifically does he state he's against background checks?...He makes some good points about addressing the problem...
9 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:38 pm
Floridatexan
PACEDOG#1 wrote:what sally and the liberals don't get is that background checks are already standard. Requiring law abiding gun owners to check the background of someone that wants to buy their guns as a resale item is unconstitutional. Criminals and such aren't getting their weapons from gun shows or private sales. They are getting them from One Eyed Mafia dude who is skirting the law.
No, they're not standard. My daughter in Montana recently bought a handgun at a gun show, with absolutely no waiting period and no registration. And don't be so sure criminals don't attend gun shows. There should be a background check and waiting period on every single gun purchase. There will always be a black market, but at least making the law apply to ALL legal gun purchases would improve the odds.
10 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:44 pm
Guest
Guest
Floridatexan wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:w.
but at least making the law apply to ALL legal gun purchases would improve the odds.
How? If a criminal is going to steal a gun or buy it illegally how are the odds going to be "improved"? I am not even against a background check and waiting period for those who do not have a concealed weapon permit but these little proposals do not address the core problem of criminals doing what they do. I would say dramatically increase the punishment for crimes committed using a firearm and quit letting felons loose after minimal jail time for violent crimes.
Even those measures can't control a mentally ill individual from committing a violent crime.
11 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:55 pm
Guest
Guest
nochain wrote:Floridatexan wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:w.
but at least making the law apply to ALL legal gun purchases would improve the odds.
How? If a criminal is going to steal a gun or buy it illegally how are the odds going to be "improved"? I am not even against a background check and waiting period for those who do not have a concealed weapon permit but these little proposals do not address the core problem of criminals doing what they do. I would say dramatically increase the punishment for crimes committed using a firearm and quit letting felons loose after minimal jail time for violent crimes.
Even those measures can't control a mentally ill individual from committing a violent crime.
So you admit the controls ALREADY in place suffice? Then why restrict private gun owners? What restrict people who are following the law? Why ban weapons that 99.9% of are being used lawfully for self-protection?
12 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 12:59 pm
Guest
Guest
PACEDOG#1 wrote:nochain wrote:Floridatexan wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:w.
but at least making the law apply to ALL legal gun purchases would improve the odds.
How? If a criminal is going to steal a gun or buy it illegally how are the odds going to be "improved"? I am not even against a background check and waiting period for those who do not have a concealed weapon permit but these little proposals do not address the core problem of criminals doing what they do. I would say dramatically increase the punishment for crimes committed using a firearm and quit letting felons loose after minimal jail time for violent crimes.
Even those measures can't control a mentally ill individual from committing a violent crime.
So you admit the controls ALREADY in place suffice? Then why restrict private gun owners? What restrict people who are following the law? Why ban weapons that 99.9% of are being used lawfully for self-protection?
Who said anything about all that?????
13 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 1:01 pm
Sal
newswatcher wrote:
Where specifically does he state he's against background checks?...He makes some good points about addressing the problem...
Maybe he went out of his way to express his opinion that background checks are a colossal waste of time and money because he's for them?
LOL
14 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 2:04 pm
Guest
Guest
Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Where specifically does he state he's against background checks?...He makes some good points about addressing the problem...
Maybe he went out of his way to express his opinion that background checks are a colossal waste of time and money because he's for them?
LOL
Maybe your an idiot troll.
15 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 3:59 pm
Guest
Guest
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Where specifically does he state he's against background checks?...He makes some good points about addressing the problem...
Maybe he went out of his way to express his opinion that background checks are a colossal waste of time and money because he's for them?
LOL
Maybe your an idiot troll.
...............................................................
It's you're, you idiot troll.
16 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 4:45 pm
Guest
Guest
W_T_M wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Where specifically does he state he's against background checks?...He makes some good points about addressing the problem...
Maybe he went out of his way to express his opinion that background checks are a colossal waste of time and money because he's for them?
LOL
Maybe your an idiot troll.
...............................................................
It's you're, you idiot troll.
Can't add to the debate... nice job Grammar Nazi.
17 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 4:48 pm
Guest
Guest
PACEDOG#1 wrote:W_T_M wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Where specifically does he state he's against background checks?...He makes some good points about addressing the problem...
Maybe he went out of his way to express his opinion that background checks are a colossal waste of time and money because he's for them?
LOL
Maybe your an idiot troll.
...............................................................
It's you're, you idiot troll.
Can't add to the debate... nice job Grammar Nazi.
..................................................................
What the fuck do you think you added with your idiot troll post...?
Asshole.
18 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 4:54 pm
boards of FL
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Can't add to the debate... nice job Grammar Nazi.
Seriously, though. Aren't you a school teacher? Don't you see the irony in someone confusing 'you're' and 'your' within very sentence in which they proclaim someone else to be an idiot?
It's no different than if I were to say, "Hey, PACEDOG! Yor dum and you kan't spel good!"
_________________
I approve this message.
19 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 4:58 pm
gulfbeachbandit
Maybe he's a gym teacher.
Or is it Jim?
Or is it Jim?
20 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 5:35 pm
Floridatexan
nochain wrote:Floridatexan wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:w.
but at least making the law apply to ALL legal gun purchases would improve the odds.
How? If a criminal is going to steal a gun or buy it illegally how are the odds going to be "improved"? I am not even against a background check and waiting period for those who do not have a concealed weapon permit but these little proposals do not address the core problem of criminals doing what they do. I would say dramatically increase the punishment for crimes committed using a firearm and quit letting felons loose after minimal jail time for violent crimes.
Even those measures can't control a mentally ill individual from committing a violent crime.
And I say take it one step further and release the NON-VIOLENT inmates so the violent ones can stay in jail where they belong.
21 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 8:40 pm
Guest
Guest
boards of FL wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:Can't add to the debate... nice job Grammar Nazi.
Seriously, though. Aren't you a school teacher? Don't you see the irony in someone confusing 'you're' and 'your' within very sentence in which they proclaim someone else to be an idiot?
It's no different than if I were to say, "Hey, PACEDOG! Yor dum and you kan't spel good!"
Uh, who really cares? When grammar corrections are placed on forums, it is usually a sign than the person commenting cannot hold their own within the debate. That is quite true here. There is never a response about the thread itself, just an attack on someone's post that has nothing to do with the topic.
Jeezzzzz
22 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 9:20 pm
Guest
Guest
Floridatexan wrote:nochain wrote:Floridatexan wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:w.
but at least making the law apply to ALL legal gun purchases would improve the odds.
How? If a criminal is going to steal a gun or buy it illegally how are the odds going to be "improved"? I am not even against a background check and waiting period for those who do not have a concealed weapon permit but these little proposals do not address the core problem of criminals doing what they do. I would say dramatically increase the punishment for crimes committed using a firearm and quit letting felons loose after minimal jail time for violent crimes.
Even those measures can't control a mentally ill individual from committing a violent crime.
And I say take it one step further and release the NON-VIOLENT inmates so the violent ones can stay in jail where they belong.
The Bernard Madoffs of the USA would love this.
23 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 9:22 pm
Guest
Guest
PACEDOG#1 wrote:boards of FL wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:Can't add to the debate... nice job Grammar Nazi.
Seriously, though. Aren't you a school teacher? Don't you see the irony in someone confusing 'you're' and 'your' within very sentence in which they proclaim someone else to be an idiot?
It's no different than if I were to say, "Hey, PACEDOG! Yor dum and you kan't spel good!"
Uh, who really cares? When grammar corrections are placed on forums, it is usually a sign than the person commenting cannot hold their own within the debate. That is quite true here. There is never a response about the thread itself, just an attack on someone's post that has nothing to do with the topic.
Jeezzzzz
.........................................................................
What debate...? You start an inflammatory thread using that broad brush invective you like to employ, then question the manhood or intelligence of those who respond. If you cannot recognize the delicious irony of your pathetic attack, you seriously have zero business in a classroom teaching kids.
I'm willing to bet the same tude you display on this forum is a mirror to what you bring to the classroom. The mirror may be a little foggy, but it's there, nonetheless.
Nothing funnier than watching a troll defend his stupidity and hypocrisy by not admitting the real issue....your grammar was off.
24 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/28/2013, 9:58 pm
boards of FL
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Uh, who really cares? When grammar corrections are placed on forums, it is usually a sign than the person commenting cannot hold their own within the debate. That is quite true here. There is never a response about the thread itself, just an attack on someone's post that has nothing to do with the topic.
Jeezzzzz
Debate? You call this debate?
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Maybe your an idiot troll.
Sal's comment was on point and directly addressed the question from your previous post. Rather than directly respond to the substance of his post, you gave us the above quote. Oddly enough, you are now trying to explain to all of us that you were somehow winning a debate by saying "Maybe your an idiot troll" and that it is everyone else who is trying to change the subject. I guess you don't follow threads all that well.
_________________
I approve this message.
25 Re: Liberals are gonna hate this 1/29/2013, 2:41 am
Guest
Guest
W_T_M wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:W_T_M wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:Sal wrote:newswatcher wrote:
Where specifically does he state he's against background checks?...He makes some good points about addressing the problem...
Maybe he went out of his way to express his opinion that background checks are a colossal waste of time and money because he's for them?
LOL
Maybe your an idiot troll.
...............................................................
It's you're, you idiot troll.
Can't add to the debate... nice job Grammar Nazi.
..................................................................
What the fuck do you think you added with your idiot troll post...?
Asshole.
Love you too.
Message [Page 1 of 2]
Go to page : 1, 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum