Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Hilary Clinton testifies before Foreign Senate Relations committee about Benghazi attack

Hilary Clinton testifies before Foreign Senate Relations committee about Benghazi attack

+9
Joanimaroni
no stress
othershoe1030
surfnrg
VectorMan
Floridatexan
Sal
knothead
boards of FL
13 posters

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 3]

boards of FL

boards of FL

Watch it live.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:Watch it live.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1

Several minutes into this testimony and not one word mentioned about the internet video that the public was told by several administration as being the cause....explains what sending out all those officials was really about...

knothead

knothead

newswatcher wrote:
boards of FL wrote:Watch it live.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1

Several minutes into this testimony and not one word mentioned about the internet video that the public was told by several administration as being the cause....explains what sending out all those officials was really about...

*********************************************************

Patience grasshopper . . . . . .

Guest


Guest

knothead wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
boards of FL wrote:Watch it live.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1

Several minutes into this testimony and not one word mentioned about the internet video that the public was told by several administration as being the cause....explains what sending out all those officials was really about...

*********************************************************

Patience grasshopper . . . . . .

If the video was sold as the cause and the individual that did the film was arrested then certainly should have been the center of the testimony...

Guest


Guest

She's doing a great job... there are simply going to be classified intel and political decisions that won't get answers.

She would have been a much better prez than obama is or mccain would've been... very sharp. You dems are dumb.

boards of FL

boards of FL

newswatcher wrote:
boards of FL wrote:Watch it live.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1

Several minutes into this testimony and not one word mentioned about the internet video that the public was told by several administration as being the cause....explains what sending out all those officials was really about...

There's a guy getting his soundbites on that right now.


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

boards of FL wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
boards of FL wrote:Watch it live.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1

Several minutes into this testimony and not one word mentioned about the internet video that the public was told by several administration as being the cause....explains what sending out all those officials was really about...

There's a guy getting his soundbites on that right now.

Wow. He messed with the bull and got the horns! That backfired!


_________________
I approve this message.

knothead

knothead

newswatcher wrote:
knothead wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
boards of FL wrote:Watch it live.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1

Several minutes into this testimony and not one word mentioned about the internet video that the public was told by several administration as being the cause....explains what sending out all those officials was really about...

*********************************************************

Patience grasshopper . . . . . .

If the video was sold as the cause and the individual that did the film was arrested then certainly should have been the center of the testimony...

*******************************************************

It's early, I have confidence in the Committee and Sec. Clinton to get to the bottom so as I said patience grasshopper . . . . . .

Sal

Sal

Rand Paul is a blathering imbecile.

Guest


Guest

Clinton's a master of obfuscation and innuedo spread so thick that the truth shall never be seen. She learned from the best, her husband, who is another mendacious prevaricator that lied under oath while POTUS until he was caught.

Lies, lies, lies...and most of America is too stupid to understand the ramifications of what occured or the consequences that will occur if people like herself continue to remain in power.

Guest


Guest

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Clinton's a master of obfuscation and innuedo spread so thick that the truth shall never be seen. She learned from the best, her husband, who is another mendacious prevaricator that lied under oath while POTUS until he was caught.

Lies, lies, lies...and most of America is too stupid to understand the ramifications of what occured or the consequences that will occur if people like herself continue to remain in power.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

And you, the master fool, have all of the truth....so much so that you advocate an armed insurrection if your side doesn't get their way.

Your pesky little resentments are your downfall. You call it as you see it, but you're too myopic to make that assessment.

You really should resign from the military since your goals and objectives are 180 from your CIC.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:She's doing a great job... there are simply going to be classified intel and political decisions that won't get answers.

She would have been a much better prez than obama is or mccain would've been... very sharp. You dems are dumb.

Right...and Republicans are so freakin' brilliant...managing to insult huge swaths of people...putting up a candidate even THEY didn't like, who, might I add....

LOST

Dolt.

VectorMan

VectorMan

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hit back against claims the administration misled Americans on the nature of the deadly Benghazi terror attack during a Senate hearing asking: 'We have four dead Americans......What difference, at this point, does it make?'

That bitch has lost her damn mind. I can hardly believe her mouth was able to form that question.

Here we go again. Lie upon lie upon lie filled with lies. They should have fired her ass months ago.

WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE? Indeed.

You lied Hillary. Along with your boss and God knows who else. It's a long list. They should all have to pay as harsh a punishment as possible. Idiots!



Last edited by VectorMan on 1/23/2013, 4:50 pm; edited 1 time in total

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

W_T_M wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:Clinton's a master of obfuscation and innuedo spread so thick that the truth shall never be seen. She learned from the best, her husband, who is another mendacious prevaricator that lied under oath while POTUS until he was caught.

Lies, lies, lies...and most of America is too stupid to understand the ramifications of what occured or the consequences that will occur if people like herself continue to remain in power.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

And you, the master fool, have all of the truth....so much so that you advocate an armed insurrection if your side doesn't get their way.

Your pesky little resentments are your downfall. You call it as you see it, but you're too myopic to make that assessment.

You really should resign from the military since your goals and objectives are 180 from your CIC.

Not to mention getting the hell out of any classroom.

Sal

Sal

Rand Paul ripped Hillary over security measures even though he proposed slashing the State Department's budget IN HALF.

Asshat extraordinaire.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:Rand Paul ripped Hillary over security measures even though he proposed slashing the State Department's budget IN HALF.

Asshat extraordinaire.

What difference at this point does it make.....WOW!....Budget debate aside...not paying attention or ignoring security requests is unaccephtable and Hillary only confirms that she as the leader of the State Department was negligent in her sworn duties...If there is enough money in the budget to have personnel and run an Embassy then there is no excuse why there was minimal to no protection...It's always strange to me that this woman is and has been portrayed as the smartest person in the room and yet she didn't know?...Now whether Rand Paul and/or others are right/wrong....at some point HRC has to accept the responsibility of being in charge and failing in her duties as Sec of State....

Sal

Sal

newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Rand Paul ripped Hillary over security measures even though he proposed slashing the State Department's budget IN HALF.

Asshat extraordinaire.

What difference at this point does it make.....WOW!....Budget debate aside...not paying attention or ignoring security requests is unaccephtable and Hillary only confirms that she as the leader of the State Department was negligent in her sworn duties...If there is enough money in the budget to have personnel and run an Embassy then there is no excuse why there was minimal to no protection...It's always strange to me that this woman is and has been portrayed as the smartest person in the room and yet she didn't know?...Now whether Rand Paul and/or others are right/wrong....at some point HRC has to accept the responsibility of being in charge and failing in her duties as Sec of State....

You better save some of that invective, because in four years she'll be starting her first term as POTUS.

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:She's doing a great job... there are simply going to be classified intel and political decisions that won't get answers.

She would have been a much better prez than obama is or mccain would've been... very sharp. You dems are dumb.

Right...and Republicans are so freakin' brilliant...managing to insult huge swaths of people...putting up a candidate even THEY didn't like, who, might I add....

LOST

Dolt.

Kinda funny... coming from you. You back a rookie nobody you know next to nothing about in 08... then can back him again after he kept nearly no campaign promises. Are you pro gitmo now? Like warrantless wiretaps today? How about the patriot act? The NDAA is ok w you? Did you like capturing enemy combatants and wakeboarding them less than or more than killing them instantly where they stand by remote control drones? How'd ya like him having an american assassinated half a world away? How many more muslim countries do you think he'll bomb this term? Is gun control for us while supplying mexican cartels and muslim extremists with heavy weaponry a good idea?

dolt indeed.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Sal wrote:Rand Paul is a blathering imbecile.

You're just noticing?

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Rand Paul ripped Hillary over security measures even though he proposed slashing the State Department's budget IN HALF.

Asshat extraordinaire.

What difference at this point does it make.....WOW!....Budget debate aside...not paying attention or ignoring security requests is unaccephtable and Hillary only confirms that she as the leader of the State Department was negligent in her sworn duties...If there is enough money in the budget to have personnel and run an Embassy then there is no excuse why there was minimal to no protection...It's always strange to me that this woman is and has been portrayed as the smartest person in the room and yet she didn't know?...Now whether Rand Paul and/or others are right/wrong....at some point HRC has to accept the responsibility of being in charge and failing in her duties as Sec of State....

You better save some of that invective, because in four years she'll be starting her first term as POTUS.



Riiiiiiight....

boards of FL

boards of FL

PACEDOG#1 wrote:
Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Rand Paul ripped Hillary over security measures even though he proposed slashing the State Department's budget IN HALF.

Asshat extraordinaire.

What difference at this point does it make.....WOW!....Budget debate aside...not paying attention or ignoring security requests is unaccephtable and Hillary only confirms that she as the leader of the State Department was negligent in her sworn duties...If there is enough money in the budget to have personnel and run an Embassy then there is no excuse why there was minimal to no protection...It's always strange to me that this woman is and has been portrayed as the smartest person in the room and yet she didn't know?...Now whether Rand Paul and/or others are right/wrong....at some point HRC has to accept the responsibility of being in charge and failing in her duties as Sec of State....

You better save some of that invective, because in four years she'll be starting her first term as POTUS.



Riiiiiiight....

May as well lock my bet in now. With PACEDOG's unparalleled forecasting ability, this is as close to a sure thing as anything gets.

Hillary wins in 2016.


_________________
I approve this message.

22Hilary Clinton testifies before Foreign Senate Relations committee about Benghazi attack Empty I'm embarrassed 1/23/2013, 8:24 pm

surfnrg

surfnrg

Unbelievable what these congressmen said.

They should be run off the hill.

Sec of state Clinton was well briefed spoken

Rand Paul needs to go home and stfu.

To accuse our sec of state of murder was appalling

This was a sad day for congress.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

surfnrg wrote:Unbelievable what these congressmen said.

They should be run off the hill.

Sec of state Clinton was well briefed spoken

Rand Paul needs to go home and stfu.

To accuse our sec of state of murder was appalling

This was a sad day for congress.

Nice pic, Surf. I agree. Rand Paul is a complete and total jerk. I already knew that, but apparently there are some here who didn't.

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

Sal wrote:Rand Paul ripped Hillary over security measures even though he proposed slashing the State Department's budget IN HALF.

Asshat extraordinaire.

Enough with the details already!

no stress

no stress

boards of FL wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:
Sal wrote:
newswatcher wrote:
Sal wrote:Rand Paul ripped Hillary over security measures even though he proposed slashing the State Department's budget IN HALF.

Asshat extraordinaire.

What difference at this point does it make.....WOW!....Budget debate aside...not paying attention or ignoring security requests is unaccephtable and Hillary only confirms that she as the leader of the State Department was negligent in her sworn duties...If there is enough money in the budget to have personnel and run an Embassy then there is no excuse why there was minimal to no protection...It's always strange to me that this woman is and has been portrayed as the smartest person in the room and yet she didn't know?...Now whether Rand Paul and/or others are right/wrong....at some point HRC has to accept the responsibility of being in charge and failing in her duties as Sec of State....

You better save some of that invective, because in four years she'll be starting her first term as POTUS.



Riiiiiiight....

May as well lock my bet in now. With PACEDOG's unparalleled forecasting ability, this is as close to a sure thing as anything gets.

Hillary wins in 2016.

Someone forgot a small detail...

There are initiatives to change winner take all in Michigan, Wisconsin, and PA.....this would have changed the election results for president in 2012.....this is entirely constitutional, and the 2016 election cannot be won by the Democrats if these three key states change their format. It would take a near landslide, or another candidate like Romney. The Democrats are getting caught with their pants down in the constant battle for gerrymandering districts and this end of the winner take all........folks may have celebrated yesterday....but they are going to get their butts kicked in 2016. Not a chance in hell that Al, Ms, Ak, Ga, or Tx is going to go from winner take all, therefore the Republicans can gain 40-60 electoral votes without getting any more voters....pretty clever.

Hilary Clinton testifies before Foreign Senate Relations committee about Benghazi attack Crybab11

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Hilary Clinton testifies before Foreign Senate Relations committee about Benghazi attack

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum