Your say so doesn't make any of the figures in my post any less credible.
Show us they are wrong.
It was a great read.....bottom line is that they took a 15 week window and noted an increase in burglaries of 1.7 per 1000 reported.......do you understand that this .17, or not even a 1% increase in burglaries from this publication by zip code.......and do you realize that there were great discrepancies in other crimes which would be deterred by a knowledgeable public knowing guns existed in a higher proportion within a given zip code.
The statistics were not bogus, but were statistically insignificant and fall within any common sense margin of error, and the contradictions in other crimes which SHOULD have been deterred by the same criminal class who read the paper make this entire use of the conclusion that burglaries go up when you publish gun ownership by zip code......well......laughable.
Now if instead of 15 week windows of comparison, instead of just one sample in Memphis, and perhaps 10 cities where this was studied......maybe 12-25 per thousand increase across the spectrum of cities, I would agree that the stats would indicate the conclusion which has been cherry picked, but a 13 week study in one city(by the way they did not really account for Arkansas suburbs, or Mississippi suburbs), and less than a 1% increase is bone chilling stupid to think this study explains anything....yes....there was a .17 increase in burglaries where gun ownership was reported to be sparse compared to SELECT suburbs of Memphis.