Dodd-Frank and the big kiss to wall street

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:

Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:

Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Of course, you don't. In your mind, you've very intelligent while everybody else is laughing their ass off. You want to answer Margin Call's question rather than posting links of someone else's answer? I think not.

im sorry. are you now answering for margin call?

I already answered it on the first page

look how low margin call has gone, you are now speaking for him LMAO

Asking you why you didn't answer Margin Call's question is not speaking for him. Did you know that? This is I have such a poor opinion of your intelligence.

his question was why did i call it blatant communism... and i told him like ill tell you. its all on the 1st page. ive already answered it.

The only thing I see is you copied an excerpt from an article. I must have missed your answer somewhere?

this is what I said on the front page of this thread:

The best way for me to explain this bill is pretty much like i veiw the obamacare bill. Its a complex take over of just about everything in our society that has any significance to do with the economy. Its blatant communism at heart really. To have so many regulations even to the smallest of things being held hostage by a bunch of government beurocrats who would sell their souls for a vote. What it does is create more leverage for our politicians to sell thier votes with each election. Thus nothing but constance changing cluster fucks could possibly ever be seen from such a monsterous bunch of regulations and laws.

Its just more transfer of power from the private sector to the Gov

I beleive my point was clear about my views on that it is blatant communism, which was the question from MC.

perhaps I should define communism for you:

a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/communism

and I have tired of the useless bickering with you on this thread about a pointless question. Youve offered nothing to the topic of dodd-frank other than harrasing me. even those in your own party have started coming out against this monster bill. < and Ive already shown that too.

soooooo

[img][/img]

Margin Call wrote:The Federal Reserve, the SEC, the Treasury Department, FDIC, etc have always regulated the financial system. Guess where their offices have always been located?

I keep looking, but I don't see where the lawsuit says the bill is "communist".

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:The Federal Reserve, the SEC, the Treasury Department, FDIC, etc have always regulated the financial system. Guess where their offices have always been located?

I keep looking, but I don't see where the lawsuit says the bill is "communist".

I never said the lawsuit said it was communist.

Those were my words. My very own conclusion.

I dont care where its located.
Do you have anything to say about the dodd-frank bill?

do you support this 2300 monstrosity?

----------
Does Dodd-Frank end bailouts? No, it writes them into law. Title II of Dodd-Frank authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to borrow up to 100 percent of the book value of a failed firm’s total consolidated assets a month after the FDIC’s appointment as receiver. In practice, this money would be used to pay off the firm’s creditors and counterparties in the name of containing “systemic risk.” This effectively shifts the risk of failure from the firm’s lenders to taxpayers and promotes the practice of privatizing profits and socializing losses that is the hallmark of “too big to fail.” Can you say taxpayer guarantee?
Read more: BACHUS: Grim Reaper's name is Dodd-Frank - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/11/bachus-grim-reapers-name-dodd-frank/#ixzz2A4aiPZ14
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:The Federal Reserve, the SEC, the Treasury Department, FDIC, etc have always regulated the financial system. Guess where their offices have always been located?

I keep looking, but I don't see where the lawsuit says the bill is "communist".

I never said the lawsuit said it was communist.

Those were my words. My very own conclusion.

I dont care where its located.
Do you have anything to say about the dodd-frank bill?

do you support this 2300 monstrosity?

----------
Does Dodd-Frank end bailouts? No, it writes them into law. Title II of Dodd-Frank authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to borrow up to 100 percent of the book value of a failed firm’s total consolidated assets a month after the FDIC’s appointment as receiver. In practice, this money would be used to pay off the firm’s creditors and counterparties in the name of containing “systemic risk.” This effectively shifts the risk of failure from the firm’s lenders to taxpayers and promotes the practice of privatizing profits and socializing losses that is the hallmark of “too big to fail.” Can you say taxpayer guarantee?
Read more: BACHUS: Grim Reaper's name is Dodd-Frank - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/11/bachus-grim-reapers-name-dodd-frank/#ixzz2A4aiPZ14
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:The Federal Reserve, the SEC, the Treasury Department, FDIC, etc have always regulated the financial system. Guess where their offices have always been located?

I keep looking, but I don't see where the lawsuit says the bill is "communist".

I never said the lawsuit said it was communist.

Those were my words. My very own conclusion.

I dont care where its located.
Do you have anything to say about the dodd-frank bill?

do you support this 2300 monstrosity?

----------
Does Dodd-Frank end bailouts? No, it writes them into law. Title II of Dodd-Frank authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to borrow up to 100 percent of the book value of a failed firm’s total consolidated assets a month after the FDIC’s appointment as receiver. In practice, this money would be used to pay off the firm’s creditors and counterparties in the name of containing “systemic risk.” This effectively shifts the risk of failure from the firm’s lenders to taxpayers and promotes the practice of privatizing profits and socializing losses that is the hallmark of “too big to fail.” Can you say taxpayer guarantee?
Read more: BACHUS: Grim Reaper's name is Dodd-Frank - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/11/bachus-grim-reapers-name-dodd-frank/#ixzz2A4aiPZ14
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

A conclusion you can't support just like the rest of your bullshit. You need to be run out of this country on a rail.

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:The Federal Reserve, the SEC, the Treasury Department, FDIC, etc have always regulated the financial system. Guess where their offices have always been located?

I keep looking, but I don't see where the lawsuit says the bill is "communist".

I never said the lawsuit said it was communist.

Those were my words. My very own conclusion.

I dont care where its located.
Do you have anything to say about the dodd-frank bill?

do you support this 2300 monstrosity?

----------
Does Dodd-Frank end bailouts? No, it writes them into law. Title II of Dodd-Frank authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to borrow up to 100 percent of the book value of a failed firm’s total consolidated assets a month after the FDIC’s appointment as receiver. In practice, this money would be used to pay off the firm’s creditors and counterparties in the name of containing “systemic risk.” This effectively shifts the risk of failure from the firm’s lenders to taxpayers and promotes the practice of privatizing profits and socializing losses that is the hallmark of “too big to fail.” Can you say taxpayer guarantee?
Read more: BACHUS: Grim Reaper's name is Dodd-Frank - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/11/bachus-grim-reapers-name-dodd-frank/#ixzz2A4aiPZ14
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

A conclusion you can't support just like the rest of your bullshit. You need to be run out of this country on a rail.

oh shut the hell up. ive provided plenty of data here. and all you got is one liners that are completly irrelevant to the subject. so you shut th hell up and stuff your ass full of fist

Margin Call wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:The Federal Reserve, the SEC, the Treasury Department, FDIC, etc have always regulated the financial system. Guess where their offices have always been located?

I keep looking, but I don't see where the lawsuit says the bill is "communist".

I never said the lawsuit said it was communist.

Those were my words. My very own conclusion.

I dont care where its located.
Do you have anything to say about the dodd-frank bill?

do you support this 2300 monstrosity?

----------
Does Dodd-Frank end bailouts? No, it writes them into law. Title II of Dodd-Frank authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to borrow up to 100 percent of the book value of a failed firm’s total consolidated assets a month after the FDIC’s appointment as receiver. In practice, this money would be used to pay off the firm’s creditors and counterparties in the name of containing “systemic risk.” This effectively shifts the risk of failure from the firm’s lenders to taxpayers and promotes the practice of privatizing profits and socializing losses that is the hallmark of “too big to fail.” Can you say taxpayer guarantee?
Read more: BACHUS: Grim Reaper's name is Dodd-Frank - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/11/bachus-grim-reapers-name-dodd-frank/#ixzz2A4aiPZ14
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

A conclusion you can't support just like the rest of your bullshit. You need to be run out of this country on a rail.

oh shut the hell up. ive provided plenty of data here. and all you got is one liners that are completly irrelevant to the subject. so you shut th hell up and stuff your ass full of fist

Data? Communist data?

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Margin Call wrote:The Federal Reserve, the SEC, the Treasury Department, FDIC, etc have always regulated the financial system. Guess where their offices have always been located?

I keep looking, but I don't see where the lawsuit says the bill is "communist".

I never said the lawsuit said it was communist.

Those were my words. My very own conclusion.

I dont care where its located.
Do you have anything to say about the dodd-frank bill?

do you support this 2300 monstrosity?

----------
Does Dodd-Frank end bailouts? No, it writes them into law. Title II of Dodd-Frank authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to borrow up to 100 percent of the book value of a failed firm’s total consolidated assets a month after the FDIC’s appointment as receiver. In practice, this money would be used to pay off the firm’s creditors and counterparties in the name of containing “systemic risk.” This effectively shifts the risk of failure from the firm’s lenders to taxpayers and promotes the practice of privatizing profits and socializing losses that is the hallmark of “too big to fail.” Can you say taxpayer guarantee?
Read more: BACHUS: Grim Reaper's name is Dodd-Frank - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/11/bachus-grim-reapers-name-dodd-frank/#ixzz2A4aiPZ14
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

A conclusion you can't support just like the rest of your bullshit. You need to be run out of this country on a rail.

oh shut the hell up. ive provided plenty of data here. and all you got is one liners that are completly irrelevant to the subject. so you shut th hell up and stuff your ass full of fist

Data? Communist data?

You havnt answered my question. Ive answered yours.

I declare victory on this thread.

now you guys can continue on with your one liners and personal attacks. Its all you got.

Floridatexan wrote:
Forget it, Margin. She has no clue whatsoever.

We need a new version of Glass-Steagall and a revision of the CFMA. And some prosecutions. We should probably start with the Republican candidate for president. I understand that Bain delivered 178% return on investment. Even Madoff could only do a consistent 10%. There's also some speculation out there about events in 2009 and UBS...is it possible that Romney was one of the 5,000 people granted amnesty for paying back taxes due? You know, the whistleblower on that case served 18 months in prison, but received a huge reward when he was released.

PkrBum wrote:MC... I was wondering the other day. Is there a way to bet against student loans?

Margin Call wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
Forget it, Margin. She has no clue whatsoever.

We need a new version of Glass-Steagall and a revision of the CFMA. And some prosecutions. We should probably start with the Republican candidate for president. I understand that Bain delivered 178% return on investment. Even Madoff could only do a consistent 10%. There's also some speculation out there about events in 2009 and UBS...is it possible that Romney was one of the 5,000 people granted amnesty for paying back taxes due? You know, the whistleblower on that case served 18 months in prison, but received a huge reward when he was released.

We need transparency and proper margin posted on all transactions to reduce counter party risk. Wall Street needs to be the most boring place in the world.

Rogue wrote:a little one liner here, another there.

nothing of substance even still. sort of like your president.

I WIN!!!

Floridatexan wrote:
Forget it, Margin. She has no clue whatsoever.

We need a new version of Glass-Steagall and a revision of the CFMA. And some prosecutions. We should probably start with the Republican candidate for president. I understand that Bain delivered 178% return on investment. Even Madoff could only do a consistent 10%. There's also some speculation out there about events in 2009 and UBS...is it possible that Romney was one of the 5,000 people granted amnesty for paying back taxes due? You know, the whistleblower on that case served 18 months in prison, but received a huge reward when he was released.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
Forget it, Margin. She has no clue whatsoever.

We need a new version of Glass-Steagall and a revision of the CFMA. And some prosecutions. We should probably start with the Republican candidate for president. I understand that Bain delivered 178% return on investment. Even Madoff could only do a consistent 10%. There's also some speculation out there about events in 2009 and UBS...is it possible that Romney was one of the 5,000 people granted amnesty for paying back taxes due? You know, the whistleblower on that case served 18 months in prison, but received a huge reward when he was released.

Madoff's consistent 10% is what got him caught. Did you know it took ten years to get the SEC to look into Madoff?

Margin Call wrote:

Rogue wrote:a little one liner here, another there.

nothing of substance even still. sort of like your president.

I WIN!!!

Who owns the banks? Who receives their bond payments and dividends? If Frank-Dodd is "communist", then there is only one answer.