Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Dodd-Frank and the big kiss to wall street

4 posters

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Guest


Guest

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/10/12/the_coming_romney_boom_115754.html

As a whole, Dodd-Frank aggregates the power of all three branches of government in one unelected, unsupervised and unaccountable bureaucrat,\" explained former White House Counsel C. Boyden Gray, who is challenging the constitutionality of the law.

Dodd/Frank weighs in at more than 1600 pages, and has already spawned more than 8000 pages of regulations -- about 30 percent of the estimated total. Many small banks believe Dodd/Frank is putting them out of business. The Wall Street giants can afford to hire compliance officers, but smaller banks are crippled by the regulations. Compliance costs are cutting into banks\' profit margins and limiting the capital available for lending.

Beyond compliance costs, banks and other institutions are stymied by the uncertainty about the 70 percent of Dodd/Frank regulations that have yet to be issued.

Even without tax reform, Mitt Romney and the Republicans could jumpstart an economic resurgence if they did just three things: 1) repeal Obamacare, 2) repeal Dodd/Frank and 3) and reverse the Obama policy of hindering domestic energy production.

As Walter Russell Mead documents in a fascinating series in the American Interest, the United States stands poised to become the world\'s largest producer of fossil fuels. \"The energy abundance that helped propel the United States to global leadership ... is back; if the energy revolution now taking shape lives up to its full potential, we are headed into a new century in which the location of the world\'s energy resources and the structure of the world\'s energy trade support American affluence at home and power abroad.\"

But it will require a president not ideologically blinkered by a ruinous commitment to \"green energy.\"

U.S. businesses are sitting on an estimated $2 trillion in liquid assets.

They\'ve been frightened into inaction, waiting for a better climate. It may be at hand

The rest of the story is at the link.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


What a complete and total load of horse manure. Oh, we can't have regulation of the markets! Oh, no. That would kill the economy! The economy fell due to lack of regulation, but in some parallel universe, removing Dodd-Frank would instantly revive everything. Put down the crack pipe.

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
What a complete and total load of horse manure. Oh, we can't have regulation of the markets! Oh, no. That would kill the economy! The economy fell due to lack of regulation, but in some parallel universe, removing Dodd-Frank would instantly revive everything. Put down the crack pipe.

Do you even know how to read? Oh that's right, you never fail to chime in with blithering drivel with only a headline deep knowledge of a subject. You sure started shooting heroin early today. Calm down.

Guest


Guest

nochain wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
What a complete and total load of horse manure. Oh, we can't have regulation of the markets! Oh, no. That would kill the economy! The economy fell due to lack of regulation, but in some parallel universe, removing Dodd-Frank would instantly revive everything. Put down the crack pipe.

Do you even know how to read? Oh that's right, you never fail to chime in with blithering drivel with only a headline deep knowledge of a subject. You sure started shooting heroin early today. Calm down.

WOW....'FT'...the slide downward continues....Can't wait for Jan 2013 for the three steps to begin and turn the nation around...But immediately after Romney wins in November the economic healing will begin...

Guest


Guest

I dont really want to allow FT the honor of distracting from a rather important subject. This is a law we need to be aware of, just like obamacare it has many hidden little agendas and caustic implications.

The American people deserve to know whats coming at them.

Read this if you care about the economy at all.

Margin Call

Margin Call

Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street's best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.

Guest


Guest

[quote=\"Margin Call\"]Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street\'s best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.[/quote]

I used to expect more out of you.

I dont care about labels.

This is an explanation of some of the things we have hurting our economy. and its also an example of what can be done to help our economy. Those things are important to me right now.

Margin Call

Margin Call

Rogue wrote:[quote=\"Margin Call\"]Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street\'s best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.

I used to expect more out of you.

I dont care about labels.

This is an explanation of some of the things we have hurting our economy. and its also an example of what can be done to help our economy. Those things are important to me right now. [/quote]

The article is garbage....and you absolutely care about labels, because I see you using them incessantly on this forum.

Guest


Guest

Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:[quote=\"Margin Call\"]Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street\'s best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.

I used to expect more out of you.

I dont care about labels.

This is an explanation of some of the things we have hurting our economy. and its also an example of what can be done to help our economy. Those things are important to me right now.

The article is garbage....and you absolutely care about labels, because I see you using them incessantly on this forum.[/quote]

Ill try to put this as simply as I can. The article isnt garbage and you need to change your nic name if you cant understand the massive implications of this monster bill.

The best way for me to explain this bill is pretty much like i veiw the obamacare bill. Its a complex take over of just about everything in our society that has any significance to do with the economy. Its blatant communism at heart really. To have so many regulations even to the smallest of things being held hostage by a bunch of government beurocrats who would sell their souls for a vote. What it does is create more leverage for our politicians to sell thier votes with each election. Thus nothing but constance changing cluster fucks could possibly ever be seen from such a monsterous bunch of regulations and laws.

Its just more transfer of power from the private sector to the Gov.

This bill is so massive like obamacare is I hardly know where to begin. We could talk about how this is why we have no more free checking, or why the ATM fees went up(these are tiny things). We could talk about that this is the real reason banks arnt lending money and hence another reason our economy hasnt bounced back. This monster was a 2010 organism too. Its a wonder we are still afloat in this country at all. This administration has literally tried to strangle the economy to death as best it could and done it right under our very own eyes.

NOW THAT IVE HAD MY RANT ABOUT IT.

Heres' what some even in your party are saying since you want to play party politics.
-------------------
President Obama’s all-or-nothing defense of the 2,600-page Dodd-Frank financial-“reform” law rammed through Congress in 2010, just after Obamacare. Yet almost by the day, even members of the president’s own party are coming to realize Dodd-Frank is actually too tough on smaller financial institutions while institutionalizing too-big-to-fail protections for large ones

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/330927/more-democrats-diss-dodd-frank-john-berlau

Even Democrats are recognizing that until Dodd-Frank is reined in, the American economy will never be restored to its full potential

commies

Guest


Guest

Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:[quote=\"Margin Call\"]Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street\'s best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.

I used to expect more out of you.

I dont care about labels.

This is an explanation of some of the things we have hurting our economy. and its also an example of what can be done to help our economy. Those things are important to me right now.

The article is garbage....and you absolutely care about labels, because I see you using them incessantly on this forum.

Ill try to put this as simply as I can. The article isnt garbage and you need to change your nic name if you cant understand the massive implications of this monster bill.

The best way for me to explain this bill is pretty much like i veiw the obamacare bill. Its a complex take over of just about everything in our society that has any significance to do with the economy. Its blatant communism at heart really. To have so many regulations even to the smallest of things being held hostage by a bunch of government beurocrats who would sell their souls for a vote. What it does is create more leverage for our politicians to sell thier votes with each election. Thus nothing but constance changing cluster fucks could possibly ever be seen from such a monsterous bunch of regulations and laws.

Its just more transfer of power from the private sector to the Gov.

This bill is so massive like obamacare is I hardly know where to begin. We could talk about how this is why we have no more free checking, or why the ATM fees went up(these are tiny things). We could talk about that this is the real reason banks arnt lending money and hence another reason our economy hasnt bounced back. This monster was a 2010 organism too. Its a wonder we are still afloat in this country at all. This administration has literally tried to strangle the economy to death as best it could and done it right under our very own eyes.

NOW THAT IVE HAD MY RANT ABOUT IT.

Heres' what some even in your party are saying since you want to play party politics.
-------------------
President Obama’s all-or-nothing defense of the 2,600-page Dodd-Frank financial-“reform” law rammed through Congress in 2010, just after Obamacare. Yet almost by the day, even members of the president’s own party are coming to realize Dodd-Frank is actually too tough on smaller financial institutions while institutionalizing too-big-to-fail protections for large ones

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/330927/more-democrats-diss-dodd-frank-john-berlau

Even Democrats are recognizing that until Dodd-Frank is reined in, the American economy will never be restored to its full potential

commies[/quote]

I have free checking.Don't know why you don't. I'm also refinancing my house so the banks are lending money. You need to stop reading these garbage articles and taking them as facts.

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:[quote=\"Margin Call\"]Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street\'s best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.

I used to expect more out of you.

I dont care about labels.

This is an explanation of some of the things we have hurting our economy. and its also an example of what can be done to help our economy. Those things are important to me right now.

The article is garbage....and you absolutely care about labels, because I see you using them incessantly on this forum.

Ill try to put this as simply as I can. The article isnt garbage and you need to change your nic name if you cant understand the massive implications of this monster bill.

The best way for me to explain this bill is pretty much like i veiw the obamacare bill. Its a complex take over of just about everything in our society that has any significance to do with the economy. Its blatant communism at heart really. To have so many regulations even to the smallest of things being held hostage by a bunch of government beurocrats who would sell their souls for a vote. What it does is create more leverage for our politicians to sell thier votes with each election. Thus nothing but constance changing cluster fucks could possibly ever be seen from such a monsterous bunch of regulations and laws.

Its just more transfer of power from the private sector to the Gov.

This bill is so massive like obamacare is I hardly know where to begin. We could talk about how this is why we have no more free checking, or why the ATM fees went up(these are tiny things). We could talk about that this is the real reason banks arnt lending money and hence another reason our economy hasnt bounced back. This monster was a 2010 organism too. Its a wonder we are still afloat in this country at all. This administration has literally tried to strangle the economy to death as best it could and done it right under our very own eyes.

NOW THAT IVE HAD MY RANT ABOUT IT.

Heres' what some even in your party are saying since you want to play party politics.
-------------------
President Obama’s all-or-nothing defense of the 2,600-page Dodd-Frank financial-“reform” law rammed through Congress in 2010, just after Obamacare. Yet almost by the day, even members of the president’s own party are coming to realize Dodd-Frank is actually too tough on smaller financial institutions while institutionalizing too-big-to-fail protections for large ones

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/330927/more-democrats-diss-dodd-frank-john-berlau

Even Democrats are recognizing that until Dodd-Frank is reined in, the American economy will never be restored to its full potential

commies
[quote]
Dreamsglore wrote:[
I have free checking.Don't know why you don't. I'm also refinancing my house so the banks are lending money. You need to stop reading these garbage articles and taking them as facts.
]

dreams. do you know how to do a proper quote? Im getting tired of having to fix your quotes when replying.

also, you want me to stop reading garbage? well tell your comandors to stop writing it.

I dont expect you to be aware of dodd-frank. your mind only works with short little bumper sticker like talking point memos.

also:
Here's some more garbage about free checking stats.
Just a few years ago, free checking accounts were abundant. In fact, banks were basically paying for customers by offering free gifts and sometimes even cash bonuses for signing up and referring new customers. Those days are gone. According to a recent survey from Bankrate.com, only 39% of banks offer a completely free checking account, one that doesn’t have a minimum balance requirement. Last year, the number was 45% and in 2009, it was 75%. Free checking accounts are an endangered species and may soon be extinct.
http://www.financeglobe.com/FN/content.php?879-Free-Checking-Accounts-Are-Slowly-Going-Away

and heres some about loans: Read it for yourself.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-26/biggest-u-s-banks-curb-loans-as-regional-firms-fill-gap.html

I know being a liberal commie and all requires you to ignore stuff like this. so just ignore it. It doesnt effect you so all must be well and good. I understand that mentality, children and liberals have always had it.

Guest


Guest

This bill is so massive like obamacare is I hardly know where to begin. We could talk about how this is why we have no more free checking, or why the ATM fees went up(these are tiny things).


Look here, you complete moron. This was your comment and I responded I have free checking. Posting an article saying only 39% have free checking has nothing to do w/ your comment. When you stop making outrageously false comments and posting garbage then we can talk. I don't ever foresee that happening because you are way out there. Oh, I know... you call it thinking for yourself. I see where that's gotten you.

Margin Call

Margin Call

[quote="Rogue"]
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:[quote=\"Margin Call\"]Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street\'s best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.

I used to expect more out of you.

I dont care about labels.

This is an explanation of some of the things we have hurting our economy. and its also an example of what can be done to help our economy. Those things are important to me right now.

The article is garbage....and you absolutely care about labels, because I see you using them incessantly on this forum.

Ill try to put this as simply as I can. The article isnt garbage and you need to change your nic name if you cant understand the massive implications of this monster bill.



So, the Federal Reserve is now the ultimate watchdog over the financial sector? Great...they were supposed to be all along. Stop trying to keep it simple...you have no idea. I'd love to hear your opinion on leverage, VaR, POMO...whatever...... lol!

Markle

Markle

Floridatexan wrote:
What a complete and total load of horse manure. Oh, we can't have regulation of the markets! Oh, no. That would kill the economy! The economy fell due to lack of regulation, but in some parallel universe, removing Dodd-Frank would instantly revive everything. Put down the crack pipe.

As you know, a major part of our problems were created by Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. To put them in charge of "fixing" what they had destroyed was one of the most outrageous happenings in the past four years. Talk about the fox guarding the hen house. Here we had the FOXES DESIGNING AND BUILDING the hen house.

Guest


Guest

[quote="Margin Call"]
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:[quote=\"Margin Call\"]Barney Frank has always been labeled as an extreme social liberal. Nope, he was Wall Street\'s best friend. He used his powers in Congress to help out the fat cats, not the little guy like so many nutties claim.

I used to expect more out of you.

I dont care about labels.

This is an explanation of some of the things we have hurting our economy. and its also an example of what can be done to help our economy. Those things are important to me right now.

The article is garbage....and you absolutely care about labels, because I see you using them incessantly on this forum.

Ill try to put this as simply as I can. The article isnt garbage and you need to change your nic name if you cant understand the massive implications of this monster bill.



So, the Federal Reserve is now the ultimate watchdog over the financial sector? Great...they were supposed to be all along. Stop trying to keep it simple...you have no idea. I'd love to hear your opinion on leverage, VaR, POMO...whatever...... lol!

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

Margin Call

Margin Call

Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

Guest


Guest

Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

Guest


Guest

Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Guest


Guest

Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Of course, you don't. In your mind, you've very intelligent while everybody else is laughing their ass off. You want to answer Margin Call's question rather than posting links of someone else's answer? I think not.

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Of course, you don't. In your mind, you've very intelligent while everybody else is laughing their ass off. You want to answer Margin Call's question rather than posting links of someone else's answer? I think not.

im sorry. are you now answering for margin call? lol!

I already answered it on the first page Smile

look how low margin call has gone, you are now speaking for him LMAO lol! lol! lol!

Guest


Guest

Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Of course, you don't. In your mind, you've very intelligent while everybody else is laughing their ass off. You want to answer Margin Call's question rather than posting links of someone else's answer? I think not.

im sorry. are you now answering for margin call? lol!

I already answered it on the first page Smile

look how low margin call has gone, you are now speaking for him LMAO lol! lol! lol!

Asking you why you didn't answer Margin Call's question is not speaking for him. Did you know that? This is I have such a poor opinion of your intelligence.

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Of course, you don't. In your mind, you've very intelligent while everybody else is laughing their ass off. You want to answer Margin Call's question rather than posting links of someone else's answer? I think not.

im sorry. are you now answering for margin call? lol!

I already answered it on the first page Smile

look how low margin call has gone, you are now speaking for him LMAO lol! lol! lol!

Asking you why you didn't answer Margin Call's question is not speaking for him. Did you know that? This is I have such a poor opinion of your intelligence.

his question was why did i call it blatant communism... and i told him like ill tell you. its all on the 1st page. ive already answered it.

Guest


Guest

Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Of course, you don't. In your mind, you've very intelligent while everybody else is laughing their ass off. You want to answer Margin Call's question rather than posting links of someone else's answer? I think not.

im sorry. are you now answering for margin call? lol!

I already answered it on the first page Smile

look how low margin call has gone, you are now speaking for him LMAO lol! lol! lol!

Asking you why you didn't answer Margin Call's question is not speaking for him. Did you know that? This is I have such a poor opinion of your intelligence.

his question was why did i call it blatant communism... and i told him like ill tell you. its all on the 1st page. ive already answered it.

The only thing I see is you copied an excerpt from an article. I must have missed your answer somewhere?

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Dreamsglore wrote:
Rogue wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Rogue wrote:

so far not much from you on this complex issue. I can see you are trying to fake your way out of having to address it any other way than hee hee haa haa Rolling Eyes

I'm happy to offer as much as you like on the subject. However, I really can't get past your description of Dodd-Frank as "blatant communism". Could you explain what you mean?

I beleive I was very clear in how I made my statement.

Youve had two pages now to make yours

Im not sure even at this point if you are defending the dodd-frank bill or just attacking me the poster for posting it. Either one makes you foolish Rolling Eyes

You really stuck your foot in it now. Prime example of why you are considered an idiot.

really?

I see no foot in my mouth. all i see is diversion and hee hee haw haw tactics.

I made my case, I gave facts, I gave links to facts to even where your side was against this.

no foot in mouth retard woman.

go pack up your desperate vagina with some cotton and hush it.

Of course, you don't. In your mind, you've very intelligent while everybody else is laughing their ass off. You want to answer Margin Call's question rather than posting links of someone else's answer? I think not.

im sorry. are you now answering for margin call? lol!

I already answered it on the first page Smile

look how low margin call has gone, you are now speaking for him LMAO lol! lol! lol!

Asking you why you didn't answer Margin Call's question is not speaking for him. Did you know that? This is I have such a poor opinion of your intelligence.

his question was why did i call it blatant communism... and i told him like ill tell you. its all on the 1st page. ive already answered it.

The only thing I see is you copied an excerpt from an article. I must have missed your answer somewhere?

this is what I said on the front page of this thread:

The best way for me to explain this bill is pretty much like i veiw the obamacare bill. Its a complex take over of just about everything in our society that has any significance to do with the economy. Its blatant communism at heart really. To have so many regulations even to the smallest of things being held hostage by a bunch of government beurocrats who would sell their souls for a vote. What it does is create more leverage for our politicians to sell thier votes with each election. Thus nothing but constance changing cluster fucks could possibly ever be seen from such a monsterous bunch of regulations and laws.

Its just more transfer of power from the private sector to the Gov

I beleive my point was clear about my views on that it is blatant communism, which was the question from MC.

perhaps I should define communism for you:

a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/communism

and I have tired of the useless bickering with you on this thread about a pointless question. Youve offered nothing to the topic of dodd-frank other than harrasing me. even those in your own party have started coming out against this monster bill. < and Ive already shown that too.

soooooo

[img]Dodd-Frank and the big kiss to wall street Sfun_d10[/img]

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum