HomePkrBum wrote:Mueller speaks in 15 minutes. Try to pay attention comrades.
He means YOU PkrBum.
Pensacola Discussion Forum
This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.
Bob Mueller's own summary is public
+5
Telstar
PkrBum
RealLindaL
Floridatexan
bigdog
9 posters
Go to page : 
1, 2, 3, 4
Message [Page 2 of 4]
26 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/29/2019, 11:22 am
Telstar
He means YOU PkrBum.
27 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/29/2019, 11:31 am
Sal
PkrBum wrote:Mueller speaks in 15 minutes. Try to pay attention comrades.
Hmmm ....
.... he basically said, "PkrDum is full of shit." ....
.... but, we already knew that.
28 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/29/2019, 11:35 am
PkrBum
Sal wrote:PkrBum wrote:Mueller speaks in 15 minutes. Try to pay attention comrades.
Hmmm ....
.... he basically said, "PkrDum is full of shit." ....
.... but, we already knew that.
How's it feel to have been wrong for 2+ straight years? Learn anything? Lmao... just kidding... obviously not.
29 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/29/2019, 12:02 pm
zsomething
https://www.yahoo.com/news/special-counsel-mueller-speak-russia-probe-11-m-134812954.html
Basically, Mueller's saying the president is not in the clear, but he never felt like he had the authority to charge him with a crime. That was never on the table for him.
It is, however, on the table for Congress, and that's why he gave them the report with the advisement that it "does not exonerate."
Congress should proceed with that.
Mueller, in his first public comments since starting the investigation in May 2017, also addressed whether there were efforts to obstruct his investigation, saying, "After that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime."
"Charging the president with a crime was ... not an option we could consider," Mueller told reporters as he announced his resignation from the Justice Department. "We concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime."
Basically, Mueller's saying the president is not in the clear, but he never felt like he had the authority to charge him with a crime. That was never on the table for him.
It is, however, on the table for Congress, and that's why he gave them the report with the advisement that it "does not exonerate."
Congress should proceed with that.
30 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/29/2019, 12:03 pm
Telstar
PkrBum wrote:Sal wrote:PkrBum wrote:Mueller speaks in 15 minutes. Try to pay attention comrades.
Hmmm ....
.... he basically said, "PkrDum is full of shit." ....
.... but, we already knew that.
How's it feel to have been wrong for 2+ straight years? Learn anything? Lmao... just kidding... obviously not.
31 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/29/2019, 8:13 pm
bigdog
Bob Mueller said outright that the Russians attacked our 2016 election for the benefit of "one candidate." That candidate was not Hillary Clinton.
Pkr still hasn't changed his Logo.
The stupid is just way, way too deep to even comprehend.
It's even deeper than a "Bless Your Heart" stupid.
Previously, I did not know that such a thing could exist in the atmosphere of our planet.
Pkr still hasn't changed his Logo.
The stupid is just way, way too deep to even comprehend.
It's even deeper than a "Bless Your Heart" stupid.
Previously, I did not know that such a thing could exist in the atmosphere of our planet.
32 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 1:06 am
PkrBum
https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/f190529.pdf
33 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 2:13 am
RealLindaL
Pkr's PDF link "not found on this server." Likely not worth reading anyway.
So how much do you suppose he's earning from the Russkies?
So how much do you suppose he's earning from the Russkies?
34 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 8:44 am
zsomething
RealLindaL wrote:Pkr's PDF link "not found on this server." Likely not worth reading anyway.
So how much do you suppose he's earning from the Russkies?
If they're paying him what he's worth, he owes them money.
35 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 10:17 am
PkrBum
Mueller botched the "standard of innocence". That still doesn't lead to trump having anything to do w Russian collusion. Proving double negatives is just dumb... but i do hope that there's impeachment in the house. The leftists will get their noses rubbed in the lack of facts. All while the base of this FISA fraud is exposed. Y'all won't like how this turns out... lol.
36 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 12:34 pm
PkrBum
DOJ, special counsel say there is 'no conflict' on Mueller, Barr statements about obstruction inquiry
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/446077-doj-special-counsel-say-there-is-no-conflict-on-mueller-barr
Barr and special counsel Robert Mueller about the role that Justice Department guidelines stating not to indict a sitting president played in Mueller’s obstruction inquiry.
“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement issued Wednesday evening.
“The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,” they said.
The remarks appeared to be directed at commentators and others who suggested earlier Wednesday that Mueller’s public remarks undercut or contradicted earlier statements by Barr on the role the Justice Department policy played in Mueller’s failure to reach a conclusion on whether President Trump obstructed justice.
Mueller said Wednesday that charging Trump with criminal wrongdoing was “not an option we could consider” as a result of the Office of Legal Counsel opinion that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
“The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy,” Mueller said. “Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.”
Mueller did not say explicitly that he would have accused Trump of a crime had it not been for the standing policy, but he reiterated that his investigation did not exonerate Trump.
“If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that,” Mueller said.
Some analysts have pointed to Barr’s earlier statements as downplaying the role of the Justice Department guidelines in Mueller’s calculus.
Barr said repeatedly in April that Mueller told him that it was not the case that he would have charged Trump with a crime had it not been for the policy.
“He reiterated several times in a group meeting that he was not saying that but for the OLC opinion he would have found obstruction,” Barr told senators during public testimony in April.
While Mueller did not reach a conclusion on obstruction, Barr said in March that he and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein reviewed the evidence laid out in Mueller’s report and found it insufficient to accuse Trump of obstructing the investigation.
Democrats have scrutinized Barr over his handling of Mueller’s findings, accusing him of misrepresenting the special counsel’s report in a way that helped Trump. Barr has defended his handling of the investigation's conclusions.
Mueller’s public remarks Wednesday represented his first since he was tapped as special counsel to lead the investigation into Russian interference.
Mueller addressed his mandate as well as his investigation’s conclusions in a hastily announced news conference Wednesday morning, which lasted about nine minutes. He described Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election as “systematic” and said the evidence collected his office was “insufficient” to charge members of Trump’s campaign in a broader conspiracy with the Kremlin.
Mueller declined to take questions and made clear he does not want to testify before Congress on the investigation, saying that his 448-page report speaks for itself.
Mueller also did not criticize Barr for his handling of the report, despite earlier correspondence showing he objected to Barr’s March memo as failing to capture the “context, nature, and substance” of his findings.
“At one point in time I requested that certain portions of the report be released. The attorney general preferred to make the entire report public all at once,” Mueller said Wednesday. “We appreciate that the attorney general made the report largely public. I do not question the attorney general’s good faith in that decision.”
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/446077-doj-special-counsel-say-there-is-no-conflict-on-mueller-barr
Barr and special counsel Robert Mueller about the role that Justice Department guidelines stating not to indict a sitting president played in Mueller’s obstruction inquiry.
“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement issued Wednesday evening.
“The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,” they said.
The remarks appeared to be directed at commentators and others who suggested earlier Wednesday that Mueller’s public remarks undercut or contradicted earlier statements by Barr on the role the Justice Department policy played in Mueller’s failure to reach a conclusion on whether President Trump obstructed justice.
Mueller said Wednesday that charging Trump with criminal wrongdoing was “not an option we could consider” as a result of the Office of Legal Counsel opinion that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
“The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy,” Mueller said. “Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.”
Mueller did not say explicitly that he would have accused Trump of a crime had it not been for the standing policy, but he reiterated that his investigation did not exonerate Trump.
“If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that,” Mueller said.
Some analysts have pointed to Barr’s earlier statements as downplaying the role of the Justice Department guidelines in Mueller’s calculus.
Barr said repeatedly in April that Mueller told him that it was not the case that he would have charged Trump with a crime had it not been for the policy.
“He reiterated several times in a group meeting that he was not saying that but for the OLC opinion he would have found obstruction,” Barr told senators during public testimony in April.
While Mueller did not reach a conclusion on obstruction, Barr said in March that he and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein reviewed the evidence laid out in Mueller’s report and found it insufficient to accuse Trump of obstructing the investigation.
Democrats have scrutinized Barr over his handling of Mueller’s findings, accusing him of misrepresenting the special counsel’s report in a way that helped Trump. Barr has defended his handling of the investigation's conclusions.
Mueller’s public remarks Wednesday represented his first since he was tapped as special counsel to lead the investigation into Russian interference.
Mueller addressed his mandate as well as his investigation’s conclusions in a hastily announced news conference Wednesday morning, which lasted about nine minutes. He described Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election as “systematic” and said the evidence collected his office was “insufficient” to charge members of Trump’s campaign in a broader conspiracy with the Kremlin.
Mueller declined to take questions and made clear he does not want to testify before Congress on the investigation, saying that his 448-page report speaks for itself.
Mueller also did not criticize Barr for his handling of the report, despite earlier correspondence showing he objected to Barr’s March memo as failing to capture the “context, nature, and substance” of his findings.
“At one point in time I requested that certain portions of the report be released. The attorney general preferred to make the entire report public all at once,” Mueller said Wednesday. “We appreciate that the attorney general made the report largely public. I do not question the attorney general’s good faith in that decision.”
37 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 2:22 pm
Floridatexan
Another day, another 2-bit "journalist".
38 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 3:41 pm
PkrBum
Floridatexan wrote:
Another day, another 2-bit "journalist".
The following statement is independent no matter where printed:
“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement issued Wednesday evening.
“The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,” they said.
Maybe read that a couple of times. Then try to remember it when you're reading kos, slate, soros, msnbc, cnn... etc.
39 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 4:52 pm
Telstar
PkrBum wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
Another day, another 2-bit "journalist".
The following statement is independent no matter where printed:
“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement issued Wednesday evening.
“The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,” they said.
Maybe read that a couple of times. Then try to remember it when you're reading kos, slate, soros, msnbc, cnn... etc.
40 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 5:22 pm
RealLindaL
zsomething wrote:RealLindaL wrote:Pkr's PDF link "not found on this server." Likely not worth reading anyway.
So how much do you suppose he's earning from the Russkies?
If they're paying him what he's worth, he owes them money.
41 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 5:25 pm
RealLindaL
I DARE Pkr to read this IN FULL (he never will, of course):
Fact-checking Trump's flurry of lies and falsehoods Thursday morning about the Mueller probe
Fact-checking Trump's flurry of lies and falsehoods Thursday morning about the Mueller probe
42 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/30/2019, 8:29 pm
bigdog
PkrBum wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
Another day, another 2-bit "journalist".
The following statement is independent no matter where printed:
“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement issued Wednesday evening.
“The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,” they said.
Maybe read that a couple of times. Then try to remember it when you're reading kos, slate, soros, msnbc, cnn... etc.
Pkr, Honey child, Mama needs to explain something to you. The Attorney General is a LIAR. He said for over a month that Mueller did not even take into consideration the Justice Department's opinion on whether a sitting president can be indicted.
And yet, it is said directly in the Mueller report, which not only Barr had, but WE had, that Mueller did not make a decision on guilt or innocence EXACTLY because of his belief that he could not indict. He stated directly, that if he said in his report that the POTUS was guilty, and the POTUS could not be indicted and face a trial, the POTUS would have no way to defend himself. That is EXACTLY why he did not say Trump was guilty, but he also made very clear that he was also not exonerating Trump. Barr has lied for over a month now, and his words are all that have been reported on Fox News, which is the only news station you watch.
If you watch CNN or MSNBC or ABC or CBS, your eyeballs will not be pierced by laser beams coming out of your TV screen. It is actually fairly safe to tune into those stations on your TV. You can do it with your remote. Do you know what a remote is? Ask one of your children-I'm pretty sure Ms Pkr has never seen or been allowed to touch the remote in your house, so she doesn't know how to use it. The children always know these things. Good Luck. Where there is life, there is hope.
43 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/31/2019, 1:22 am
PkrBum
bigdog wrote:PkrBum wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
Another day, another 2-bit "journalist".
The following statement is independent no matter where printed:
“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the [Office of Legal Counsel] opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement issued Wednesday evening.
“The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,” they said.
Maybe read that a couple of times. Then try to remember it when you're reading kos, slate, soros, msnbc, cnn... etc.
Pkr, Honey child, Mama needs to explain something to you. The Attorney General is a LIAR. He said for over a month that Mueller did not even take into consideration the Justice Department's opinion on whether a sitting president can be indicted.
And yet, it is said directly in the Mueller report, which not only Barr had, but WE had, that Mueller did not make a decision on guilt or innocence EXACTLY because of his belief that he could not indict. He stated directly, that if he said in his report that the POTUS was guilty, and the POTUS could not be indicted and face a trial, the POTUS would have no way to defend himself. That is EXACTLY why he did not say Trump was guilty, but he also made very clear that he was also not exonerating Trump. Barr has lied for over a month now, and his words are all that have been reported on Fox News, which is the only news station you watch.
If you watch CNN or MSNBC or ABC or CBS, your eyeballs will not be pierced by laser beams coming out of your TV screen. It is actually fairly safe to tune into those stations on your TV. You can do it with your remote. Do you know what a remote is? Ask one of your children-I'm pretty sure Ms Pkr has never seen or been allowed to touch the remote in your house, so she doesn't know how to use it. The children always know these things. Good Luck. Where there is life, there is hope.
Do you know what it's called in this country when an investigator/prosecutor is unable to reach a determination as to whether a person has committed a crime? Think all the way back to Comey's statement about Hillary's case... and he actually did have evidence... but do you consider her guilty of anything? Mueller did not find evidence. Not for collusion... not for obstruction. So where will that leave the house during impeachment? The collusion was just a political stunt... to put it mildly. That'll have its own reckoning. You won't like how it ends.
Oh... and please support impeachment. It'd be a shame to miss that circus... lol.
44 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/31/2019, 2:30 am
Telstar
PkrBum wrote:bigdog wrote:PkrBum wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
Another day, another 2-bit "journalist".
Pkr, Honey child, Mama needs to explain something to you. The Attorney General is a LIAR. He said for over a month that Mueller did not even take into consideration the Justice Department's opinion on whether a sitting president can be indicted.
And yet, it is said directly in the Mueller report, which not only Barr had, but WE had, that Mueller did not make a decision on guilt or innocence EXACTLY because of his belief that he could not indict. He stated directly, that if he said in his report that the POTUS was guilty, and the POTUS could not be indicted and face a trial, the POTUS would have no way to defend himself. That is EXACTLY why he did not say Trump was guilty, but he also made very clear that he was also not exonerating Trump. Barr has lied for over a month now, and his words are all that have been reported on Fox News, which is the only news station you watch.
If you watch CNN or MSNBC or ABC or CBS, your eyeballs will not be pierced by laser beams coming out of your TV screen. It is actually fairly safe to tune into those stations on your TV. You can do it with your remote. Do you know what a remote is? Ask one of your children-I'm pretty sure Ms Pkr has never seen or been allowed to touch the remote in your house, so she doesn't know how to use it. The children always know these things. Good Luck. Where there is life, there is hope.
46 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/31/2019, 9:18 am
PkrBum
The special council found no direct evidence that bigfoot is real or not real.
Leftists: So bigfoot is real..!!
Leftists: So bigfoot is real..!!
47 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/31/2019, 10:31 am
RealLindaL
PkrBum wrote:The special council found no direct evidence that bigfoot is real or not real.
Leftists: So bigfoot is real..!!
UN-BLANKING-BELIEVABLE.
I would say this man's intellect is seriously challenged, but that would be the understatement of the modern era.
48 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/31/2019, 12:44 pm
Telstar
RealLindaL wrote:PkrBum wrote:The special council found no direct evidence that bigfoot is real or not real.
Leftists: So bigfoot is real..!!
UN-BLANKING-BELIEVABLE.
I would say this man's intellect is seriously challenged, but that would be the understatement of the modern era.
49 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 5/31/2019, 1:18 pm
Floridatexan
PkrBum wrote:The special council found no direct evidence that bigfoot is real or not real.
Leftists: So bigfoot is real..!!
TRUMP’S RUSSIA COVER-UP BY THE NUMBERS – 251 CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA-LINKED OPERATIVES
Last Updated April 30, 2019
"On April 18, 2019, a redacted copy of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s “Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election” (Mueller Report) was released to the public. The Mueller report builds on the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that there were two campaigns to elect Donald Trump— one run by Trump and one run by the Russian government. The Mueller report clearly identified collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, despite repeated denials from Trump and many of his senior advisers and close associates that there were any connections between the two campaigns.
A total of 251 contacts between Trump’s team and Russia-linked operatives have been identified, including at least 37 meetings. And we know that at least 33 high-ranking campaign officials and Trump advisers were aware of contacts with Russia-linked operatives during the campaign and transition, including Trump himself. None of these contacts were ever reported to the proper authorities. Instead, the Trump team tried to cover up every single one of them.
Beyond the many lies the Trump team told to the American people, Mueller himself repeatedly remarked on how far the Trump team was willing to go to hide their Russian contacts, stating, “the investigation established that several individuals affiliated with the Trump Campaign lied to the Office, and to Congress, about their interactions with Russian-affiliated individuals and related matters. Those lies materially impaired the investigation of Russian election interference.”
Below is a comprehensive chronological list of the contacts that have been discovered to date and some of the many lies Trump’s campaign, transition team, and White House told to hide them.
Extensive reporting, subsequent admissions, and special counsel Mueller’s indictments and report have revealed at least 251 contacts between the Trump team and Russia-linked operatives, despite repeated denials. Among these contacts were 37 meetings (which include Skype calls), which are highlighted below..."
https://themoscowproject.org/explainers/trumps-russia-cover-up-by-the-numbers-70-contacts-with-russia-linked-operatives/
*********
Please explain why the Trump campaign, after being briefed on August 17, 2016, about the probability of election interference by the Russians, did and said nothing to the FBI. Also explain why several Trump team members lied about their contacts with Russians before, during and after the election.
50 Re: Bob Mueller's own summary is public 6/1/2019, 10:59 am
PkrBum
Obama knew about Russian interference in early 2014. What did he do?
I'll help... used it to weaponize federal agencies for spying on the opposition campaign. Tick tock.
I'll help... used it to weaponize federal agencies for spying on the opposition campaign. Tick tock.
Message [Page 2 of 4]
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
|