PkrBum wrote:There was already more "documentation" than any previous nominee. So no... that's irrelevant.
Just how much "credence" does a person deserve that has an unblemished record?
These aren't goalposts that you should want to move for political purposes.
The process has denigrated both the Senate and the court nominees. There was not full disclosure. Important documents were kept secret and will only come out later. I've also seen R's on camera making the same claim you've stated here but whereas there might have been a lot of information some of the potentially most damaging was kept under wraps. New details have emerged about potentially thousands of Brett Kavanaugh’s White House emails and other records related to the Senate hacking scandal from early in the George W. Bush administration and other controversial subjects that have not been disclosed to the Senate, according to Democratic senators on the Judiciary Committee.
The undisclosed documents, which date from Kavanaugh’s time in the Bush White House, are set to be produced in coming weeks as a result of two Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, one pursued by Democratic senators on the Judiciary Committee and another by an outside privacy group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC). Release of the documents is still subject to White House approval and other consultations.
The Senate hacking scandal involved a Republican Judiciary Committee aide, Manny Miranda, who, according to an official investigation, infiltrated the electronic files of Democrats on the committee with the help of a co-conspirator, James Lundell, and passed the intelligence on to other senators, the White House, and friendly opinion columnists over a period of years. The pilfered material contained, among other things, Democrats’ research and prepared questions for judicial nominees.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/lawsuits-point-large-trove-unreleased-kavanaugh-white-house-documents-202543065.html