Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

The Final Version of the G.O.P. Tax Bill Is a Corrupt, Cruel, Budget-Busting Hairball

+2
2seaoat
Floridatexan
6 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Grant the Republican Party leaders one thing: their tactics in passing their hugely unpopular tax bill have been consistent—consistently evasive. A few weeks ago, the Senate version of the bill was passed in the middle of the night. This weekend, the final iteration of the legislation was made public on Friday evening—a traditional dumping ground for bad news. The Republicans intend to hold votes on the bill early next week in both houses of Congress, and it seems certain to pass.

It is hardly surprising that Republicans don’t want to give anyone too much time to look closely at their latest handiwork. The final tax bill is the product of a conference committee that was tasked with reconciling the different bills passed in the House and the Senate. Almost eleven hundred pages long, the final bill is just as regressive and fiscally irresponsible as either of the two earlier bills, and it is arguably more so. At its center is a huge tax cut for corporations and unincorporated business partnerships—such as the ones that Donald Trump owns—while arrayed around the edges are all sorts of carve-outs and giveaways to favored industries and interest groups.

For individual households, the bill contains some tax cuts and expanded family credits. But these provisions are temporary, and they are also partially offset by changes to the rules about deductions. Because the deduction for state and local taxes will be limited to ten thousand dollars a year, for instance, some upper-middle-class households in states like California and New York could end up paying more to the federal government.

Nowhere to be found in the bill are three elements that House Speaker Paul Ryan, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and their colleagues originally promised to deliver when they urged the American public to embrace tax reform: revenue neutrality, simplicity, and fairness. The final bill is a corrupt, budget-busting hairball.

According to its authors, the bill will increase the budget deficit by about $1.5 trillion over ten years. That’s a lot of money, obviously, but it’s an underestimate. If you adjust the numbers for a series of accounting gimmicks, such as expiration provisions that are unlikely to go into effect, the real cost seems likely to come out at more than two trillion dollars.

To insure that the final bill would have enough votes in both chambers, the conference committee larded the bill with various additional handouts. They reduced the top rate of income tax to thirty-seven per cent, compared to 38.5 per cent in the Senate bill. (Currently, the effective top rate is close to forty-one per cent.) And they did a big favor to large businesses by getting rid of the corporate Alternative Minimum Tax, which many of them could have ended up paying because their tax rates under the new system will be so low.

The principle of simplifying the tax code met the same fate as the principle of fiscal responsibility: it was jettisoned. Originally, the White House proposed reducing the number of tax brackets from seven to three. The final bill contains seven brackets: ten per cent, twelve per cent, twenty-two per cent, twenty-four per cent, thirty-two per cent, thirty-five per cent, and thirty-seven per cent. On the business side, the revised treatment of pass-through income is so complicated that most tax experts don’t yet fully understand it. One thing we do know is that it will create big incentives for highly paid employees to turn themselves into independent contractors or L.L.C.s, which qualify for the new low business tax rates.

As for fairness, that principle was junked a long time ago. The final bill reflects the same principle as the previous two G.O.P. bills: Dom Perignon for the plutocrats, cheap swill for the masses. The bill is also cruel. In abolishing the Affordable Care Act’s mandate to purchase health insurance, it will make individual plans even more costly and more difficult to obtain, especially for sick people. This isn’t just a tax bill. It is a backdoor effort to overturn the principle of universal access to health care.

As reporters went through the bill on Friday evening, they discovered various quirks, giveaways, and clawbacks, which appeared to reflect last-minute lobbying and rushed rewriting. Businesses owned by trusts were given a break, and so were architectural and engineering firms. On the personal side, the bill was found to contain a substantial marriage penalty: the maximum deduction of ten thousand dollars for state and local taxes is the same for individual filers and couples. That’s bad news for people who are wed—though the blow will be cushioned for those married couples who own sports franchises. The Wall Street Journalreported on Friday night that the bill “preserves the ability to use tax-exempt bonds for professional sports stadium bonds—a priority for Mr. Trump, a GOP aide said.”

Another provision, which wasn’t in the House or Senate bills, allows real-estate developers who own buildings through L.L.C.s, as Trump does, to deduct twenty per cent of the income that these properties generate. To qualify for the break, the properties have to be newish ones that haven’t been fully depreciated. “This helps people who have held property for a while, like Donald Trump,” David Kamin, a law professor at New York University, told David Sirota and Josh Keefe, of the International Business Times.

Another beneficiary of this provision may well be Senator Bob Corker, of Tennessee, who is also a real-estate investor. Corker had been the only Republican to vote against the Senate version of the tax bill, but on Friday he announced that he’d changed his mind, and that “after great thought and consideration, I believe this once-in-a-generation opportunity to make U.S. businesses domestically more productive and internationally more competitive is one we should not miss.” Corker didn’t mention his personal interests, but Sirota and Keefe did. “Federal records reviewed by IBT show that Corker has millions of dollars of ownership stakes in real-estate-related LLCs that could also benefit” from the final bill, they reported.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-final-version-of-the-gop-tax-bill-is-a-corrupt-cruel-budget-busting-hairball?mbid=nl_Daily%20121817%20Nonsubs&CNDID=14244234&spMailingID=12587770&spUserID=MTMzMTc5NTk4NDA0S0&spJobID=1301705613&spReportId=MTMwMTcwNTYxMwS2

2seaoat



The tax bill is no surprise. It is the reduction of taxes on the wealthy. There will be no trickle down. There will be electoral changes. Americans are not fooled by who will benefit.

RealLindaL



2seaoat wrote:There will be electoral changes.  Americans are not fooled by who will benefit.  

From your lips, etc. And the polls would seem to back you up -- this legislation is highly unpopular. But it will pass anyway because Trump knows best. RIGHT.

Things just keep going from bad to worse under this administration. Terribly depressing.

2seaoat



I quit being depressed when Alabama elected a democrat. Texas can do the same. Nevada can do the same. Trump is evil. Evil will always be defeated by good. Sometimes it is only a matter of time. Hate and racism being sold as populism rings too true to historical facts. I only hope to live long enough to see him out of office, and America no longer at war.

zsomething



2seaoat wrote:I quit being depressed when Alabama elected a democrat.  Texas can do the same.  Nevada can do the same.  Trump is evil.  Evil will always be defeated by good.  Sometimes it is only a matter of time.  Hate and racism being sold as populism rings too true to historical facts.  I only hope to live long enough to see him out of office, and America no longer at war.

So far, signs for 2018 are very encouraging.   I'm not stocking too much in the defeat of Roy Moore as a harbinger, because he's a uniquely horrible candidate (boy can Bannon pick 'em!) and we can't count on getting an off-the-rails child-molesting theocratic lunatic Yosemite Sam clone in every race... but, Republicans are definitely falling out of favor, and Trump -- and their own cowardly refusal to reject him -- is dragging them down like an anchor.    

And even though Obamacare wasn't nearly as bad as some people got trained to believe, it did drag down Democrats' popularity a bit.  And the Repubs are just about to pass a tax bill that's going to be far more unpopular than Obamacare.  Most of the pain of that will start being felt in 2020, when it stalls out the momentum of the great economy Trump inherited, but it'll still be a factor in 2018.

Check out this chart:

The Final Version of the G.O.P. Tax Bill Is a Corrupt, Cruel, Budget-Busting Hairball 28-house-challengers.nocrop.w710.h2147483647

Back in 2010, Republicans swept national and state level elections in a big wave. The president's party almost always loses seats, anyway, but you can see the factor in 2009, the build-up of Republican candidates. That's what helped give them that good year. They had nearly twice as many challengers as the Dems did.

Now, look at that 2017 number. Ho-lee shazbot. Dems have damn near eight times as many challengers lined up already.

I ain't countin' chickens, because you never know in politics, but looking at that chart has got to be bringing Republicans a lot of cold sweat when they plan for next year. We already have a few announcing retirement rather than face it. I won't be surprised if that number doesn't go up. And, yep, Texas could go blue. They've flirted with it for years now. It's trending away from the Republicans, in an erosion process.

Republican support has been ebbing away generationally for a long time now, but Trump's obnoxious overreach is likely to speed that process up from slow erosion to earthquake. And that's even if nothing comes of the Mueller investigation... and I wouldn't count on that much, if I were Republican.

2seaoat



In the end with this tax bill you can see the one common denominator for all Republicans is giving money to the 1%. This is the uniting cry of this band of mercenaries for hire. The backlash will be historic. Nobody is confused any longer as to what their mission is. I pray that the top rate can be increased to 45% in 2020, and nobody is fooled any more by racism in the guise of populism and economic reform which creates Santa claus fantasy about trickle down.

EmeraldGhost

EmeraldGhost

Most Americans in flyover land will get a bit more back on their taxes than they otherwise would have.   For some it will be in the low hundreds, for others it may be a couple  of thousand.  

And that's all they'll remember.   So long as they got their little bump, they'll be happy & continue to vote against abortion, socialism, Black Lives Matter, the gays, ObamaCare, 'Murca, Jeesus  ... or whatever it is they think they're against (or for.)   Republicans in the Congress know this.    The people railing against this tax bill are people who aren't going to vote Republican anyway.  Republicans in the Congress know that too.

Besides ... many Americans envy & idolize the wealthy  & want to be like them.   Many secretly think there is a very real off-chance they too just might become a bazillionaire someday (via lottery, lawsuit, Vegas, American Idol, or whatever.), so they won't begrudge them their tax cut.  

And deficits?  Who cares about deficits?  That's just a word people use when they want to slam Democrats.

Telstar

Telstar

EmeraldGhost wrote:Most Americans in flyover land will get a bit more back on their taxes than they otherwise would have.   For some it will be in the low hundreds, for others it may be a couple  of thousand.  

And that's all they'll remember.   So long as they got their little bump, they'll be happy & continue to vote against abortion, socialism, Black Lives Matter, the gays, ObamaCare, 'Murca, Jeesus  ... or whatever it is they think they're against (or for.)   Republicans in the Congress know this.    The people railing against this tax bill are people who aren't going to vote Republican anyway.  Republicans in the Congress know that too.

Besides ... many Americans envy & idolize the wealthy  & want to be like them.   Many secretly think there is a very real off-chance they too just might become a bazillionaire someday (via lottery, lawsuit, Vegas, American Idol, or whatever.), so they won't begrudge them their tax cut.  

And deficits?  Who cares about deficits?  That's just a word people use when they want to slam Democrats.







Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum