[img][/img]
Pensacola Discussion Forum
othershoe1030 wrote:
Rogue wrote:With that in mind, we looked at unemployment rates and found that Obama’s numbers are still worse than those of his predecessor. Bush’s average monthly unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, compared to 9.2 percent for the current president.
Let’s see what happens when we credit Bush with the entire period of the Great Recession, which ended in June 2009. He still fares better, averaging an unemployment rate of 5.4 percent, compared to Obama’s 9.3 percent after the economic downturn
Margin Call wrote:Rogue wrote:With that in mind, we looked at unemployment rates and found that Obama’s numbers are still worse than those of his predecessor. Bush’s average monthly unemployment rate was 5.2 percent, compared to 9.2 percent for the current president.
Let’s see what happens when we credit Bush with the entire period of the Great Recession, which ended in June 2009. He still fares better, averaging an unemployment rate of 5.4 percent, compared to Obama’s 9.3 percent after the economic downturn
If you cut and paste something, at least give them credit!
Rogue wrote:[img][/img]
Floridatexan wrote:
Bush's Budget Blunders (in-depth review of Bush's pathetic economic record, which led directly to where we are today).
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1872229_1872230_1872231,00.html
-------------------------------
http://crooksandliars.com/jon-perr/10-epic-failures-of-the-bush-tax-cuts
Markle wrote: I take it that you realize it takes 150,000 new jobs per month, just to keep even with population growth.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|