Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’ How does Trump always know?

Markle wrote:I post facts...and the Progressives here live in denial.

Markle wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

Markle wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Meanwhile, while Lame Dork poster Markle crafts cheap propaganda threads denigrating a gold-star Muslim family, former soldiers who actually KNEW slain Captain Humayun Khan (unlike the Lame Dork…) have gone public with their praise about how the late Captain Khan was an excellent leader who was ready to give his all for his soldiers.

Slain Cpt. Khan Praised as "Amazing Man" by Soldier
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/03/politics/captain-khan-sergeant-walker-praise/index.html

Excerpts:

(CNN) — "Amazing leader." "The best." "My friend."

Those were some of the words Sgt. Lacy Walker used to describe Cpt. Humayun Khan, the slain Muslim American solider whose parents became embroiled in a controversial feud with Donald Trump following Khizr Khan's emotional speech at the Democratic National Convention.

"If you worked for Captain Khan, then you knew you were taken care of. You knew that everything was going to be ok. You knew you were safe," she said. "I know as the human being he was, as the soldier he was, every day he would always look out for us. He would always make sure we were safe."

"He didn't wear his heritage on his shoulder. He wore the American flag like all of us did. He was a soldier. He was a man. He died honorably. He didn't die because he's a Muslim. He didn't even -- he didn't shout out that he was a Muslim. He was just proud to serve his country and proud to serve with his troops."

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The story by this woman characterizes the Khans in a different light from the false narratives parroted in the Brietbart article used by Lame Dork poster Markle to craft this thread.

Breitbart is to wingnuts what DailyKos is to the far-left.

Nice try at deflection...again.  Please share with us what is false in the article I posted.

If you cannot, Please simply post that in a moment of weakness, you lied.

I read said article. The author spins a bunch of BS because back in 1983, Mr. Kahn wrote a positive review on a book about religious rights and Islam. The false narratives in that article grow exponentially from there. You based an entire thread on a Breitbart article based on a whole lot of nothing. Here, allow me to give this back to you:



Breitbart is no better than DailyKos, but those kind of articles suit Lame Dork poster Markle well, because he can use them in his sophomoric propaganda pieces.

Thanks for your spin.  Does he, or does he not believe that Sharia Law takes precidence over the U.S. Constitution?  It is a simple yes or no answer.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Wait a minute, Wordslinger.... He's still claiming its a fact, even though both you and I disproved it. Perhaps he should go back and finally read the article for the first time, and all associated links (like you and I did) to see that his assertion was full of baloney.

I think he just proved to us that he never reads the articles he uses for his cheap propaganda pieces. HAHAHAHA!

Markle wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Wait a minute, Wordslinger.... He's still claiming its a fact, even though both you and I disproved it. Perhaps he should go back and finally read the article for the first time, and all associated links (like you and I did) to see that his assertion was full of baloney.

I think he just proved to us that he never reads the articles he uses for his cheap propaganda pieces. HAHAHAHA!

Cute try.

Neither of you proved anything  Again, I posted FACTS, you and Wordslinger, again, simply denigrated me, which, as you should know by now, fazes me not in the least.  I take nothing personal.

BUT, don't let that stop you and your Socialist bud from looking childish and foolish.  

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:I think he just proved to us that he never reads the articles he uses for his cheap propaganda pieces. HAHAHAHA!

Wordslinger wrote:And if you can't we'll just go on thinking of you as a liar.

Markle wrote:My Progressive good friends work hard to make me look great!

Keep up the good work guys, and keep the childish name calling and profanities coming.  They prove you have nothing and I've really gotten under your skin.  Life is good.

Khizr Khan Has Written Extensively On Sharia Law

Photo of Alex Pfeiffer
ALEX PFEIFFER
Reporter

Khizr Khan, the Muslim father of a slain American soldier, is an attorney who has previously written in a law journal about Islamic law. He specifically wrote about the purity of the Quran and the Sunnah over all other texts and interpretations.

Khan rose to fame after speaking at the Democratic National Convention Thursday and pulling out a pocket U.S. Constitution imploring if Donald Trump had even read it.

Khan wrote “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law” in the Houston Journal of International Law in 1983. In it he breaks down different levels of Islamic law. Khan writes that the Quran and the Sunnah which were both directly created by the Muslim prophet Muhammad were the only sources in Muhammad’s lifetime that “were recognized as binding.”

“The Shari’ah-was completed during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited,” Khan continues to write. “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr-khan-has-previously-written-extensively-on-sharia-law/#ixzz4Gld4ngWW

Wordslinger wrote:The reference "U.S. Constitution" does not appear in either source.  

Markle wrote:Does he, or does he not believe that Sharia Law takes precedence over the U.S. Constitution?  It is a simple yes or no answer.