Donald Trump bounces into the lead

2seaoat wrote:.   Right now the feeling that white people have is that he will put blacks, Muslims, and hispanics back into their place.  

Bob wrote:

2seaoat wrote:.   Right now the feeling that white people have is that he will put blacks, Muslims, and hispanics back into their place.  

Ben Carson supports Trump.  Ben Carson must want black people to be put back in their place.  lol

RealLindaL wrote:It's my understanding that poll number always bounce right after a candidate's convention.   Would hope that will hold true for Hillary as well, but the Wikileaks thing is a distraction.

Just wish someone would hack into the RNC because there would almost surely be very similar emailed machinations revealed in their attempts to quash Trump.  

None of it should be a shocker to anyone.  

Floridatexan wrote:


British artist James Ostrer poses next to a photo portrait depicting Donald Trump made of a pig's snout, sheep eyes, raw fish, crude oil and gold-leaf-plated rubble at the art fair "Art Central" in Hong Kong, Wednesday, March 23, 2016. The photo portrait is part of his installation called The Ego System, which also includes depictions of other celebrities such as Miley Cyrus and Tiger Woods, on display at Art Central, a satellite art show held the same week as the Art Basel Hong Kong fair.
Photo by Kin Cheung

Saul Alinsky wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:It's my understanding that poll number always bounce right after a candidate's convention.   Would hope that will hold true for Hillary as well, but the Wikileaks thing is a distraction.

Just wish someone would hack into the RNC because there would almost surely be very similar emailed machinations revealed in their attempts to quash Trump.  

None of it should be a shocker to anyone.  

The DNC showed a slight bias in favor of the loyal, long-time establishment candidate over an insurgent who publicly stated that he was only running as a Democrat to make use of their resources??

Remind me again what the "D" in DNC stands for ...

Spare me the fainting couch.

2seaoat wrote:If anybody chooses not to vote, or vote for a third candidate, they are voting for Donald Trump.  It really is that simple.

RealLindaL wrote:

Saul Alinsky wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:It's my understanding that poll number always bounce right after a candidate's convention.   Would hope that will hold true for Hillary as well, but the Wikileaks thing is a distraction.

Just wish someone would hack into the RNC because there would almost surely be very similar emailed machinations revealed in their attempts to quash Trump.  

None of it should be a shocker to anyone.  

The DNC showed a slight bias in favor of the loyal, long-time establishment candidate over an insurgent who publicly stated that he was only running as a Democrat to make use of their resources??

Remind me again what the "D" in DNC stands for ...

Spare me the fainting couch.

I presume you're not addressing me here.

Saul Alinsky wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:

Saul Alinsky wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:It's my understanding that poll number always bounce right after a candidate's convention.   Would hope that will hold true for Hillary as well, but the Wikileaks thing is a distraction.

Just wish someone would hack into the RNC because there would almost surely be very similar emailed machinations revealed in their attempts to quash Trump.  

None of it should be a shocker to anyone.  

The DNC showed a slight bias in favor of the loyal, long-time establishment candidate over an insurgent who publicly stated that he was only running as a Democrat to make use of their resources??

Remind me again what the "D" in DNC stands for ...

Spare me the fainting couch.

I presume you're not addressing me here.

Nope ...

... just riffing off what you wrote.

Saul Alinsky wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:It's my understanding that poll number always bounce right after a candidate's convention.   Would hope that will hold true for Hillary as well, but the Wikileaks thing is a distraction.

Just wish someone would hack into the RNC because there would almost surely be very similar emailed machinations revealed in their attempts to quash Trump.  

None of it should be a shocker to anyone.  

The DNC showed a slight bias in favor of the loyal, long-time establishment candidate over an insurgent who publicly stated that he was only running as a Democrat to make use of their resources??

Remind me again what the "D" in DNC stands for ...

Spare me the fainting couch.

RealLindaL wrote:

Saul Alinsky wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:

Saul Alinsky wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:It's my understanding that poll number always bounce right after a candidate's convention.   Would hope that will hold true for Hillary as well, but the Wikileaks thing is a distraction.

Just wish someone would hack into the RNC because there would almost surely be very similar emailed machinations revealed in their attempts to quash Trump.  

None of it should be a shocker to anyone.  

The DNC showed a slight bias in favor of the loyal, long-time establishment candidate over an insurgent who publicly stated that he was only running as a Democrat to make use of their resources??

Remind me again what the "D" in DNC stands for ...

Spare me the fainting couch.

I presume you're not addressing me here.

Nope ...

... just riffing off what you wrote.

Hokay, kiddo.  Riff off me any time you want.  

2seaoat wrote:If anybody chooses not to vote, or vote for a third candidate, they are voting for Donald Trump.  It really is that simple.

2seaoat wrote:The point being that rationalizing that an action of protest is anything of the sort.......it is taking a stand, and in this case it is a vote for Donald Trump if you choose not to vote, or vote for a protest candidate.   Nothing more or less.....just a simple truth, you are helping fascism.

Saul Alinsky wrote:You vote for the Trumpster Fire or you vote for Hillary.

That's the choice.

And, make no mistake about it, if you choose not to vote for either or vote for Trump, you are responsible should Trump win.

It will not be the fault of Hillary nor her supporters - she has the experience and she’s made her case.

It's decision time, and as the old song goes, “if you choose not to decide you still have made a choice.”

This is not about your feeeeeeelings.

Determine which candidate is more likely to do things of which you approve, and which one is more likely to open the seventh seal, and depending on your level of psychosis, make a fucking choice.

Grow the fuck up and do your duty as a citizen.

SheWrites wrote:

2seaoat wrote:If anybody chooses not to vote, or vote for a third candidate, they are voting for Donald Trump.  It really is that simple.

I was told, by a friend, that if I choose not to vote, or vote for a third candidate, my vote would be a vote for Hillary Clinton.

Simple?  Just depends on who is spinning the crap around my choice as a voter to vote for who I please.  

Bullies.  Never did like them.

SheWrites wrote:

Saul Alinsky wrote:You vote for the Trumpster Fire or you vote for Hillary.

That's the choice.

And, make no mistake about it, if you choose not to vote for either or vote for Trump, you are responsible should Trump win.

It will not be the fault of Hillary nor her supporters - she has the experience and she’s made her case.

It's decision time, and as the old song goes, “if you choose not to decide you still have made a choice.”

This is not about your feeeeeeelings.

Determine which candidate is more likely to do things of which you approve, and which one is more likely to open the seventh seal, and depending on your level of psychosis, make a fucking choice.

Grow the fuck up and do your duty as a citizen.

Prime example of the bully tactic.

I am a grown up who will vote.    I'm tired of people assuming and telling me what my vote is worth, who it will apply to, and whether or not I'm a dutiful citizen.

Emotions?  Feelings?  I think they show themselves quite well through every person's post on this forum.